@article{DiersAcarWagneretal.2022,
  author    = {Diers, Johannes and Acar, Laura and Wagner, Johanna C. and Baum, Philip and Hankir, Mohammed and Flemming, Sven and Kastner, Carolin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and L'hoest, Helmut and Marschall, Ursula and Lock, Johan Friso and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Cancer diagnosis is one quarter lower than the expected cancer incidence in the first year of COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A retrospective register-based cohort study},
  series = {Cancer Communications},
  volume    = {42},
  journal   = {Cancer Communications},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1002/cac2.12314},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-312862},
  pages     = {673-676},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WagnerWetzWiegeringetal.2021,
  author    = {Wagner, Johanna C. and Wetz, Anja and Wiegering, Armin and Lock, Johan F. and L{\"o}b, Stefan and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Klein, Ingo},
  title     = {Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy},
  series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  volume    = {406},
  journal   = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1435-2451},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00423-021-02221-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267541},
  pages     = {2479-2487},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds "preconditioned" with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). Results One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013-2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7\% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80\% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. Conclusion Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KoehlerHendricksKastneretal.2021,
  author    = {K{\"o}hler, Franziska and Hendricks, Anne and Kastner, Carolin and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Boerner, Kevin and Wagner, Johanna C. and Lock, Johan F. and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Laparoscopic appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis-a systematic review},
  series = {International Journal of Colorectal Disease},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {International Journal of Colorectal Disease},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {1432-1262},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00384-021-03927-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266616},
  pages     = {2283-2286},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background Over the last years, laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively replaced open appendectomy and become the current gold standard treatment for suspected, uncomplicated appendicitis. At the same time, though, it is an ongoing discussion that antibiotic therapy can be an equivalent treatment for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the safety and efficacy of antibiotic therapy and compare it to the laparoscopic appendectomy for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis. Methods The PubMed database, Embase database, and Cochrane library were scanned for studies comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection and data extraction. The primary endpoint was defined as successful treatment of appendicitis. Secondary endpoints were pain intensity, duration of hospitalization, absence from work, and incidence of complications. Results No studies were found that exclusively compared laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis. Conclusions To date, there are no studies comparing antibiotic treatment to laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, thus emphasizing the lack of evidence and need for further investigation.},
  language  = {en}
}