@article{WoloshynPressleySchneider1992,
  author    = {Woloshyn, Vera E. and Pressley, Michael and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Elaborative interrogation as a function of prior knowledge},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62187},
  year      = {1992},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BjorklundSchneiderHarnishfegeretal.1992,
  author    = {Bjorklund, David F. and Schneider, Wolfgang and Harnishfeger, Katherine Kipp and Cassel, William S. and Bjorklund, Barbara R. and Bernholtz, Jean E.},
  title     = {The role of IQ, expertise, and motivation in the recall of familiar Information},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62204},
  year      = {1992},
  abstract  = {High- and low-IQ children in the first, third, and fifth grades performed two free-recall tasks: a sort-recall task with sets of categorically related pictures, and a class-recall task, with children recalling the current members of their school class. All children were deemed to be experts concerning the composition of their school class, but, unlike experts in other domains, had no special motivation associated with their expertise. Recall and clustering on both tasks were high. The high-IQ children performed better than low-IQ children only on the sort-recall task. IQ was significantly correlated with measures of performance on the sort-recall task but not on the class-recall task. The results reflect the fact that the memory benefits associated with being an expert (here, elimination of IQ effects) are related to the greater knowledge the expert possesses and not to factors of motivation.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{KoerkelSchneider1992,
  author    = {K{\"o}rkel, Joachim and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Domain-specific versus metacognitive knowledge effects on text recall and comprehension},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-86647},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {1992},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  subject      = {Unterricht},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CarrSchneider1991,
  author    = {Carr, Martha and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Long-term maintenance of organizational strategies in kindergarten children},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62157},
  year      = {1991},
  abstract  = {The goal of the present study was to determine whether 4- and 5-year-old kindergarten children could be trained to maintain an organizational strategy over 2- and 8 week periods through an elaborate training program. A second goal was to assess the effects of the training program on strategy awareness. Twenty-eight kindergarten children were pretested on two sort-recall tasks and their awareness of the use of the clustering strategy was assessed through a protocol type procedure. Half the children received seven half-hour sessions of individual training in the clustering strategy and half the children participated in a control group. Both groups were post-tested on two sort-recall tasks 2 weeks following training and again 8 weeks following training. Strategy awareness, as measured by verbal protocol, was assessed at both post-test points. The elaborate strategy training program was successful in inducing short- and long-term strategy maintenance of the clustering strategy. Trained children's clustering during sorting and clustering during recall was consistently related to the amount of items correctly recalled. No differences in strategy awareness were found. These findings demonstrate that the elaborate training procedure used in this study can be a very effective memory technique for young kindergarten children.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeinertSchneiderAsendorpfetal.1991,
  author    = {Weinert, Franz E. and Schneider, Wolfgang and Asendorpf, Jens B. and Bullock, M. and Helmke, Andreas and Knopf, Monika and Nunner-Winkler, G. and Stern, E. and Strube, G. and Weber, Andreas},
  title     = {Intra- und interindividuelle Unterschiede in der psychischen Entwicklung von Kindern},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-86627},
  year      = {1991},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  subject      = {Kind},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KurtzSchneiderCarretal.1990,
  author    = {Kurtz, Beth E. and Schneider, Wolfgang and Carr, Martha and Borkowski, John G. and Rellinger, Elizabeth},
  title     = {Strategy instruction and attributional beliefs in West Germany and the United States: Do teachers foster metacognitive development?},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62145},
  year      = {1990},
  abstract  = {Previous research has shown German children to be more strategic on sort-recall memory tasks than their American age-mates, and to show fewer effort-related attributions. We conducted this study to determine if those differences are due to systematic differences in the strategy instruction and attributional beliefs of German and U.S. teachers, and to explore metacognitive instructional practices in the two countries. Teachers responded to a questionnaire that inquired about their use of strategy instructions, fostering of reflective thinking in pupils, sources of children's learning problems, and modeling of metacognitive skills such as monitoring. The second part of the questionnaire asked about the reasons underlying children's academic successes and failures. German teachers reported more instruction of task-specific strategies, while American teachers showed more effort-related attributions. The types of strategies instructed and types of learning problems most frequently described varied across the two countries, and also according to how many years the teachers had taught. Results were discussed regarding their implications for metacognitive developmental theory, particularly regarding culture and other environmental influences on the development of controlled processing.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PressleyBorkowskiSchneider1990,
  author    = {Pressley, Michael and Borkowski, John G. and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62127},
  year      = {1990},
  abstract  = {The nature of good information processing is outlined as determined by intact neurology, information stored in long-term memory, and general cognitive tendencies, attitudes, and styles. Educators can promote the development of good information processing by promoting what is in long-term memory. This can be accomplished by teaching important literary, scientific, and cultural knowledge; teaching strategies; motivating the acquisition and use of important conceptual knowledge and strategies; and encouraging the general tendencies supporting good information processing. Good information processing can be produced by years of appropriate educational input. Good information processors cannot be produced by short-term interventions.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SodianSchneider1990,
  author    = {Sodian, Beate and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Children's understanding of cognitive cueing: How to manipulate cues to fool a competitor},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62132},
  year      = {1990},
  abstract  = {4-6-year-old children's understanding of cognitive cuing was studied in 2 experiments using a strategic interaction paradigm. Ghildren could fool a competitor by hiding targets in locations that were labeled with semantically weakly associated cues and help a cooperative partner by hiding them in semantically highly associated locations. Very few 4-year-olds, half the 5-year-olds, and almost all 6-year-olds appropriately chose semantically highly vs. weakly associated hiding places to make the targets easy vs. difficult to find. The second experiment showed that 4-year-olds did not strategically manipulate cues as sources of information, although they themselves proficiently used them as such in a search task. These findings are discussed with regard to research on children's developing understanding of origins of knowledge and belief and with regard to recent claims that young preschoolers possess a metacognitive understanding of cognitive cuing.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchneiderUhl1990,
  author    = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Uhl, Christhild},
  title     = {Metaged{\"a}chtnis, Strategienutzung und Ged{\"a}chtnisleistung: Vergleichende Analysen bei Kindern, j{\"u}ngeren Erwachsenen und alten Menschen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-69418},
  year      = {1990},
  abstract  = {Am Beispiel einer semantischen Kategorisierungsaufgabe (sort-recall task) wurde der Frage nachgegangen, in welchen Bestimmungsgr{\"o}ßen sich die Ged{\"a}chtnisleistungen von Schulkindern, j{\"u}ngeren sowie {\"a}lteren Erwachsenen voneinander unterscheiden. Es wurde angenommen, daß f{\"u}r diese drei Altersgruppen Ged{\"a}chtnisleistungen bei dieser Aufgabe in unterschiedlicher Weise durch Strategie- und Wissensaspekte bestimmt sind. Die im Vergleich zu Schulkindern und {\"a}lteren Erwachsenen {\"u}blicherweise besseren Leistungen j{\"u}ngerer Erwachsener sollten demnach im wesentlichen auf die konsequentere Nutzung von Ged{\"a}chtnisstrategien r{\"u}ckf{\"u}hrbar sein. Erwartet wurde weiterhin, daß die bei Schulkindern und {\"a}lteren Erwachsenen oft vorfindbaren "Produktionsdefizite" in der Strategienutzung unterschiedliche Ursachen haben : fehlt es bei den Sch{\"u}lern am notwendigen Ged{\"a}chtniswissen (Metaged{\"a}chtnis), so sind die Defizite der {\"a}lteren Menschen vorwiegend auf die mangelnde Erfahrung mit der Aufgabe zur{\"u}ckzuf{\"u}hren. Diese Annahmen wurden in einer Studie mit je 24 Probanden aus den drei genannten Altersgruppen {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft. W{\"a}hrend sich das erwartete Produktionsdefizit bei den Kindern auf unzureichendes Metaged{\"a}chtnis zur{\"u}ckf{\"u}hren ließ, gab es wenig Anhaltspunkte daf{\"u}r, daß das Strategiedefizit {\"a}lterer Menschen in wesentlichen auf mangelnde Aufgabenerfahrung r{\"u}ckf{\"u}hrbar ist. Leistungsunterschiede zwischen j{\"u}ngeren und {\"a}lteren Erwachsenen beruhen nicht auf unterschiedlichem Ged{\"a}chtniswissen, sondern d{\"u}rften auf dem kombinierten Einfluß von Strategie- und Kapazit{\"a}tsdefiziten basieren.},
  subject      = {Metaged{\"a}chtnis},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{CarrKurtzSchneideretal.1989,
  author    = {Carr, Martha and Kurtz, Beth E. and Schneider, Wolfgang and Turner, Lisa A. and Borkowski, John G.},
  title     = {Strategy acquisition and transfer among American and German children: Environmental influences on metacognitive development},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62082},
  year      = {1989},
  abstract  = {This study explored the differential effects of strategy training on German and American elementaryschool children and assessed the role of parents in the development of their children's strategic behavior and metacognition. 184 German and 161 American children were pretested on memory and metamemory tasks. Children were then assigned to either an organizational strategy training condition or a control condition. All children were tested on the maintenance and far-transfer of the strategy and task-related metamemory 1 week following training. Parents completed questionnaires about strategy instruction in the home. Strategy maintenance and metacognition were reassessed 6 months following training. German children were more strategic than American children. Instructed children performed better than control children. German parents reported more instruction of strategies in the home. These data suggest that formal education is responsible for aspects of cognitive development that have sometimes been viewed as a function of age.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}