@phdthesis{Wandtner2018, author = {Wandtner, Bernhard}, title = {Non-driving related tasks in highly automated driving - Effects of task characteristics and drivers' self-regulation on take-over performance}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-173956}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The rise of automated driving will fundamentally change our mobility in the near future. This thesis specifically considers the stage of so called highly automated driving (Level 3, SAE International, 2014). At this level, a system carries out vehicle guidance in specific application areas, e.g. on highway roads. The driver can temporarily suspend from monitoring the driving task and might use the time by engaging in so called non-driving related tasks (NDR-tasks). However, the driver is still in charge to resume vehicle control when prompted by the system. This new role of the driver has to be critically examined from a human factors perspective. The main aim of this thesis was to systematically investigate the impact of different NDR-tasks on driver behavior and take-over performance. Wickens' (2008) architecture of multiple resource theory was chosen as theoretical framework, with the building blocks of multiplicity (task interference due to resource overlap), mental workload (task demands), and aspects of executive control or self-regulation. Specific adaptations and extensions of the theory were discussed to account for the context of NDR-task interactions in highly automated driving. Overall four driving simulator studies were carried out to investigate the role of these theoretical components. Study 1 showed that drivers focused NDR-task engagement on sections of highly automated compared to manual driving. In addition, drivers avoided task engagement prior to predictable take-over situations. These results indicate that self-regulatory behavior, as reported for manual driving, also takes place in the context of highly automated driving. Study 2 specifically addressed the impact of NDR-tasks' stimulus and response modalities on take-over performance. Results showed that particularly visual-manual tasks with high motoric load (including the need to get rid of a handheld object) had detrimental effects. However, drivers seemed to be aware of task specific distraction in take-over situations and strictly canceled visual-manual tasks compared to a low impairing auditory-vocal task. Study 3 revealed that also the mental demand of NDR-tasks should be considered for drivers' take-over performance. Finally, different human-machine-interfaces were developed and evaluated in Simulator Study 4. Concepts including an explicit pre-alert ("notification") clearly supported drivers' self-regulation and achieved high usability and acceptance ratings. Overall, this thesis indicates that the architecture of multiple resource theory provides a useful framework for research in this field. Practical implications arise regarding the potential legal regulation of NDR-tasks as well as the design of elaborated human-machine-interfaces.}, subject = {Autonomes Fahrzeug}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{vonderMuehlen2018, author = {von der M{\"u}hlen, Sarah}, title = {Fostering Students' Epistemic Competences when Dealing with Scientific Literature}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-167343}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The abilities to comprehend and critically evaluate scientific texts and the various arguments stated in these texts are an important aspect of scientific literacy, but these competences are usually not formally taught to students. Previous research indicates that, although undergraduate students evaluate the claims and evidence they find in scientific documents to some extent, these evaluations usually fail to meet normative standards. In addition, students' use of source information for evaluation is often insufficient. The rise of the internet and the increased accessibility of information have yielded some additional challenges that highlight the importance of adequate training and instruction.The aim of the present work was to further examine introductory students' competences to systematically and heuristically evaluate scientific information, to identify relevant strategies that are involved in a successful evaluation, and to use this knowledge to design appropriate interventions for fostering epistemic competences in university students.To this end, a number of computer-based studies, including both quantitative and qualitative data as well as experimental designs, were developed. The first two studies were designed to specify educational needs and to reveal helpful processing strategies that are required in different tasks and situations. Two expert-novice comparisons were developed, whereby the performance of German students of psychology (novices) was compared to the performance of scientists from the domain of psychology (experts) in a number of different tasks, such as systematic plausibility evaluations of informal arguments (Study 1) or heuristic evaluations of the credibility of multiple scientific documents (Study 2). A think-aloud procedure was used to identify specific strategies that were applied in both groups during task completion, and that possibly mediated performance differences between students and scientists. In addition, relationships between different strategies and between strategy use and relevant conceptual knowledge was examined. Based on the results of the expert-novice comparisons, an intervention study, consisting of two training experiments, was constructed to foster some competences that proved to be particularly deficient in the comparisons (Study 3). Study 1 examined introductory students' abilities to accurately judge the plausibility of informal arguments according to normative standards, to recognise common argumentation fallacies, and to identify different structural components of arguments. The results from Study 1 indicate that many students, compared to scientists, lack relevant knowledge about the structure of arguments, and that normatively accurate evaluations of their plausibility seem to be challenging in this group. Often, common argumentation fallacies were not identified correctly. Importantly, these deficits were partly mediated by differences in strategy use: It was especially difficult for students to pay sufficient attention to the relationship between argument components when forming their judgements. Moreover, they frequently relied on their intuition or opinion as a criterion for evaluation, whereas scientists predominantly determined quality of arguments based on their internal consistency. In addition to students' evaluation of the plausibility of informal arguments, Study 2 examined introductory students' competences to evaluate the credibility of multiple scientific texts, and to use source characteristics for evaluation. The results show that students struggled not only to judge the plausibility of arguments correctly, but also to heuristically judge the credibility of science texts, and these deficits were fully mediated by their insufficient use of source information. In contrast, scientists were able to apply different strategies in a flexible manner. When the conditions for evaluation did not allow systematic processing (i.e. time limit), they primarily used source characteristics for their evaluations. However, when systematic evaluations were possible (i.e. no time limit), they used more sophisticated normative criteria for their evaluations, such as paying attention to the internal consistency of arguments (cf. Study 1). Results also showed that students, in contrast to experts, lacked relevant knowledge about different publication types, and this was related to their ability to correctly determine document credibility. The results from the expert-novice comparisons also suggest that the competences assessed in both tasks might develop as a result of a more fundamental form of scientific literacy and discipline expertise. Performances in all tasks were positively related. On the basis of these results, two training experiments were developed that aimed at fostering university students' competences to understand and evaluate informal arguments (Study 3). Experiment 1 describes an intervention approach in which students were familiarised with the formal structure of arguments based on Toulmin's (1958) argumentation model. The performance of the experimental group to identify the structural components of this model was compared to the performance of a control group in which speed reading skills were practiced, using a pre-post-follow-up design. Results show that the training was successful for improving the comprehension of more complex arguments and relational aspects between key components in the posttest, compared to the control group. Moreover, an interaction effect was found with study performance. High achieving students with above average grades profited the most from the training intervention. Experiment 2 showed that training in plausibility, normative criteria of argument evaluation, and argumentation fallacies improved students' abilities to evaluate the plausibility of arguments and, in addition, their competences to recognise structural components of arguments, compared to a speed-reading control group. These results have important implications for education and practice, which will be discussed in detail in this dissertation.}, subject = {Textverstehen}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Krishna2018, author = {Krishna, Anand}, title = {Regulatory Focus Theory and Information Processing - A Series of Exploratory Studies}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-163365}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Regulatory focus (RF) theory (Higgins, 1997) states that individuals follow different strategic concerns when focusing on gains (promotion) rather than losses (prevention). Applying the Reflective-Impulsive Model (RIM, Strack \& Deutsch, 2004), this dissertation investigates RF's influence on basic information processing, specifically semantic processing (Study 1), semantic (Study 2) and affective (Study 3) associative priming, and basic reflective operations (Studies 4-7). Study 1 showed no effect of RF on pre-activation of RF-related semantic concepts in a lexical decision task (LDT). Study 2 indicated that primes fitting a promotion focus improve performance in a LDT for chronically promotion-focused individuals, but not chronically prevention-focused individuals. However, the latter performed better when targets fit their focus. Stronger affect and arousal after processing valent words fitting an RF may explain this pattern. Study 3 showed some evidence for stronger priming effects for negative primes in a bona-fide pipeline task (Fazio et al., 1995) for chronically prevention-focused participants, while also providing evidence that situational prevention focus insulates individuals from misattributing the valence of simple primes. Studies 4-7 showed that a strong chronic prevention focus leads to greater negation effects for valent primes in an Affect Misattribution Procedure (Payne et al., 2005), especially when it fits the situation. Furthermore, Study 6 showed that these effects result from stronger weighting of negated valence rather than greater ease in negation. Study 7 showed that the increased negation effect is independent of time pressure. Broad implications are discussed, including how RF effects on basic processing may explain higher-order RF effects.}, subject = {Motivation}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Jaeger2018, author = {J{\"a}ger, Dana}, title = {Zur p{\"a}dagogischen Legitimation des W{\"u}rzburger Trainingsprogrammes H{\"o}ren, lauschen, lernen: Trainingseffekte und Trainereffekte}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-174051}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Programmans{\"a}tze und deren Einsatz in vorschulisch, schulisch und außerschulisch bildenden Kontexten erfreuen sich der zunehmenden Beliebtheit. Ein breites und nicht nachlassendes Interesse in Forschung und Praxis kommt insbesondere vorschulischen Trainingskonzepten zuteil, denen das Potenzial zugesprochen wird, sp{\"a}ter auftretenden Schwierigkeiten beim Erwerb der Schriftsprache wirksam vorzubeugen. Das W{\"u}rzburger Trainingsprogramm »H{\"o}ren, lauschen, lernen« stellt einen konzeptionell auf schriftspracherwerbstheoretischen Annahmen fundierten und mit mehreren evaluierenden Studien erprobten Trainingsansatz dar. Dieser bezweckt, Kindern den Erwerb des Lesens und Schreibens zu erleichtern. Dem Anspruch, sp{\"a}teren Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten effektiv vorzubeugen, unterliegt die vorschulische F{\"o}rderung bereichsspezifischer Kompetenzen des Schriftspracherwerbs, insbesondere der Kompetenz phonologische Bewusstheit. Die F{\"o}rderung wird optimal ausgesch{\"o}pft, sofern Empfehlungen einer qualitativen Implementierung umgesetzt werden, die als Manualtreue, Durchf{\"u}hrungsintensit{\"a}t, Programmdifferenzierung, Programmkomplexit{\"a}t, Implementierungsstrategien, Vermittlungsqualit{\"a}t und Teilnehmerreaktion spezifiziert sind. Zunehmend diskutiert sind in der Trainingsforschung, neben der theoretischen Fundierung und dem zu erbringenden Nachweis an empirischer Evidenz von Programmans{\"a}tzen, Kriterien der Praxistauglichkeit. Daher befasst sich die vorliegende Arbeit mit der Frage der Programmrobustheit gegen{\"u}ber Trainereffekten. Es nahmen 300 Kinder an dem W{\"u}rzburger Trainingsprogramm teil und wurden 64 Kindern gegen{\"u}bergestellt, die dem regul{\"a}ren Kindergartenprogramm folgten. Angeleitet durch das erzieherische Personal fand das 5-monatig andauernde Training innerhalb des Vorschuljahres statt. Die kindliche Entwicklung in den bereichsspezifischen Kompetenzen der phonologischen Bewusstheit und der Graphem-Phonem-Korrespondenz wurde vor und nach der Trainingsmaßnahme sowie zum Schul{\"u}bertritt und in den Kompetenzen des Rechtschreibens und Lesens zum Ende des ersten Schuljahres untersucht. Es ließen sich unmittelbar und langfristig Trainingseffekte des eingesetzten Programmes nachweisen; indessen blieb ein Transfererfolg aus. Der Exploration von Trainereffekten unterlag eine Eruierung der Praxistauglichkeit des Trainingsprogrammes anhand der erfolgten Implementierung durch das anleitende erzieherische Personal. Aus der urspr{\"u}nglich mit 300 Kindern aus 44 involvierten Kinderg{\"a}rten bestehenden Datenbasis wurden drei Subgruppen mit insgesamt 174 Kindern aus 17 Kinderg{\"a}rten identifiziert, bei denen deutliche Diskrepanzen zu unmittelbaren, langfristigen und transferierenden Effekten des Trainingsprogrammes auftraten. Exploriert wurden Unterschiede in der Durchf{\"u}hrung, um R{\"u}ckschl{\"u}sse auf qualitative Aspekte der Programmimplementierung zu ziehen. Die Befunde des Extremgruppenvergleichs deuteten an, dass weniger Aspekte der Manualtreue und Durchf{\"u}hrungsintensit{\"a}t ausschlaggebend f{\"u}r die Programmwirksamkeit waren; vielmehr schien f{\"u}r die Wirksamkeit des Trainingsprogrammes die Implementierung in der Art und Weise, wie die Trainingsinhalte den Kindern durch das erzieherische Personal vermittelt waren, entscheidend zu sein. Befunde zur eruierten Teilnehmerreaktion, die auf differenzielle F{\"o}rdereffekte verweisen, stellten die Trainingswirksamkeit insbesondere f{\"u}r Kinder heraus, bei denen prognostisch ein Risiko unterstellt war, sp{\"a}ter auftretende Schwierigkeiten mit der Schriftsprache zu entwickeln. Ferner zeichnete sich ab, dass neben der Qualit{\"a}t der Programmimplementierung scheinbar auch Unterschiede in der schulischen Instruktionsmethode des Lesens und Schreibens einen nivellierenden Einfluss auf den Transfererfolg des Programmes aus{\"u}bten. Theoretische und praktische Implikationen f{\"u}r den Einsatz des Trainingsprogrammes wurden diskutiert.}, subject = {Phonologische Bewusstheit}, language = {de} } @article{RuboGamer2018, author = {Rubo, Marius and Gamer, Matthias}, title = {Social content and emotional valence modulate gaze fixations in dynamic scenes}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {8}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-018-22127-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227106}, pages = {3804, 1-11}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Previous research has shown that low-level visual features (i.e., low-level visual saliency) as well as socially relevant information predict gaze allocation in free viewing conditions. However, these studies mainly used static and highly controlled stimulus material, thus revealing little about the robustness of attentional processes across diverging situations. Secondly, the influence of affective stimulus characteristics on visual exploration patterns remains poorly understood. Participants in the present study freely viewed a set of naturalistic, contextually rich video clips from a variety of settings that were capable of eliciting different moods. Using recordings of eye movements, we quantified to what degree social information, emotional valence and low-level visual features influenced gaze allocation using generalized linear mixed models. We found substantial and similarly large regression weights for low-level saliency and social information, affirming the importance of both predictor classes under ecologically more valid dynamic stimulation conditions. Differences in predictor strength between individuals were large and highly stable across videos. Additionally, low-level saliency was less important for fixation selection in videos containing persons than in videos not containing persons, and less important for videos perceived as negative. We discuss the generalizability of these findings and the feasibility of applying this research paradigm to patient groups.}, language = {en} } @article{SchieleZieglerKollertetal.2018, author = {Schiele, Miriam A. and Ziegler, Christiane and Kollert, Leonie and Katzorke, Andrea and Schartner, Christoph and Busch, Yasmin and Gromer, Daniel and Reif, Andreas and Pauli, Paul and Deckert, J{\"u}rgen and Herrmann, Martin J. and Domschke, Katharina}, title = {Plasticity of Functional MAOA Gene Methylation in Acrophobia}, series = {International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology}, volume = {21}, journal = {International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1093/ijnp/pyy050}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228571}, pages = {822-827}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Epigenetic mechanisms have been proposed to mediate fear extinction in animal models. Here, MAOA methylation was analyzed via direct sequencing of sodium bisulfite-treated DNA extracted from blood cells before and after a 2-week exposure therapy in a sample of n = 28 female patients with acrophobia as well as in n = 28 matched healthy female controls. Clinical response was measured using the Acrophobia Questionnaire and the Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire. The functional relevance of altered MAOA methylation was investigated by luciferase-based reporter gene assays. MAOA methylation was found to be significantly decreased in patients with acrophobia compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, MAOA methylation levels were shown to significantly increase after treatment and correlate with treatment response as reflected by decreasing Acrophobia Questionnaire/Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire scores. Functional analyses revealed decreased reporter gene activity in presence of methylated compared with unmethylated pCpGfree_MAOA reporter gene vector constructs. The present proof-of-concept psychotherapy-epigenetic study for the first time suggests functional MAOA methylation changes as a potential epigenetic correlate of treatment response in acrophobia and fosters further investigation into the notion of epigenetic mechanisms underlying fear extinction.}, language = {en} } @article{TrafimowAmrheinAreshenkoffetal.2018, author = {Trafimow, David and Amrhein, Valentin and Areshenkoff, Corson N. and Barrera-Causil, Carlos J. and Beh, Eric J. and Bilgi{\c{c}}, Yusuf K. and Bono, Roser and Bradley, Michael T. and Briggs, William M. and Cepeda-Freyre, H{\´e}ctor A. and Chaigneau, Sergio E. and Ciocca, Daniel R. and Correa, Juan C. and Cousineau, Denis and de Boer, Michiel R. and Dhar, Subhra S. and Dolgov, Igor and G{\´o}mez-Benito, Juana and Grendar, Marian and Grice, James W. and Guerrero-Gimenez, Martin E. and Guti{\´e}rrez, Andr{\´e}s and Huedo-Medina, Tania B. and Jaffe, Klaus and Janyan, Armina and Karimnezhad, Ali and Korner-Nievergelt, Fr{\"a}nzi and Kosugi, Koji and Lachmair, Martin and Ledesma, Rub{\´e}n D. and Limongi, Roberto and Liuzza, Marco T. and Lombardo, Rosaria and Marks, Michael J. and Meinlschmidt, Gunther and Nalborczyk, Ladislas and Nguyen, Hung T. and Ospina, Raydonal and Perezgonzalez, Jose D. and Pfister, Roland and Rahona, Juan J. and Rodr{\´i}guez-Medina, David A. and Rom{\~a}o, Xavier and Ruiz-Fern{\´a}ndez, Susana and Suarez, Isabel and Tegethoff, Marion and Tejo, Mauricio and van de Schoot, Rens and Vankov, Ivan I. and Velasco-Forero, Santiago and Wang, Tonghui and Yamada, Yuki and Zoppino, Felipe C. M. and Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando}, title = {Manipulating the Alpha Level Cannot Cure Significance Testing}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, number = {699}, issn = {1664-1078}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00699}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-189973}, year = {2018}, abstract = {We argue that making accept/reject decisions on scientific hypotheses, including a recent call for changing the canonical alpha level from p = 0.05 to p = 0.005, is deleterious for the finding of new discoveries and the progress of science. Given that blanket and variable alpha levels both are problematic, it is sensible to dispense with significance testing altogether. There are alternatives that address study design and sample size much more directly than significance testing does; but none of the statistical tools should be taken as the new magic method giving clear-cut mechanical answers. Inference should not be based on single studies at all, but on cumulative evidence from multiple independent studies. When evaluating the strength of the evidence, we should consider, for example, auxiliary assumptions, the strength of the experimental design, and implications for applications. To boil all this down to a binary decision based on a p-value threshold of 0.05, 0.01, 0.005, or anything else, is not acceptable.}, language = {en} } @article{GromerMadeiraGastetal.2018, author = {Gromer, Daniel and Madeira, Oct{\´a}via and Gast, Philipp and Nehfischer, Markus and Jost, Michael and M{\"u}ller, Mathias and M{\"u}hlberger, Andreas and Pauli, Paul}, title = {Height Simulation in a Virtual Reality CAVE System: Validity of Fear Responses and Effects of an Immersion Manipulation}, series = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, number = {372}, issn = {1662-5161}, doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2018.00372}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-196113}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Acrophobia is characterized by intense fear in height situations. Virtual reality (VR) can be used to trigger such phobic fear, and VR exposure therapy (VRET) has proven effective for treatment of phobias, although it remains important to further elucidate factors that modulate and mediate the fear responses triggered in VR. The present study assessed verbal and behavioral fear responses triggered by a height simulation in a 5-sided cave automatic virtual environment (CAVE) with visual and acoustic simulation and further investigated how fear responses are modulated by immersion, i.e., an additional wind simulation, and presence, i.e., the feeling to be present in the VE. Results revealed a high validity for the CAVE and VE in provoking height related self-reported fear and avoidance behavior in accordance with a trait measure of acrophobic fear. Increasing immersion significantly increased fear responses in high height anxious (HHA) participants, but did not affect presence. Nevertheless, presence was found to be an important predictor of fear responses. We conclude that a CAVE system can be used to elicit valid fear responses, which might be further enhanced by immersion manipulations independent from presence. These results may help to improve VRET efficacy and its transfer to real situations.}, language = {en} } @article{RodriguesNagowskiMusseletal.2018, author = {Rodrigues, Johannes and Nagowski, Natalie and Mussel, Patrick and Hewig, Johannes}, title = {Altruistic punishment is connected to trait anger, not trait altruism, if compensation is available}, series = {Heliyon}, volume = {4}, journal = {Heliyon}, number = {11}, doi = {10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00962}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177669}, pages = {e00962}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Altruistic punishment and altruistic compensation are important concepts that are used to investigate altruism. However, altruistic punishment has been found to be correlated with anger. We were interested whether altruistic punishment and altruistic compensation are both driven by trait altruism and trait anger or whether the influence of those two traits is more specific to one of the behavioral options. We found that if the participants were able to apply altruistic compensation and altruistic punishment together in one paradigm, trait anger only predicts altruistic punishment and trait altruism only predicts altruistic compensation. Interestingly, these relations are disguised in classical altruistic punishment and altruistic compensation paradigms where participants can either only punish or compensate. Hence altruistic punishment and altruistic compensation paradigms should be merged together if one is interested in trait altruism without the confounding influence of trait anger.}, language = {en} } @article{RothSteffensVignoles2018, author = {Roth, Jenny and Steffens, Melanie C. and Vignoles, Vivian L.}, title = {Group membership, group change, and intergroup attitudes: a recategorization model based on cognitive consistency principles}, series = {Frontiers in Psychology}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, number = {479}, doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-175569}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The present article introduces a model based on cognitive consistency principles to predict how new identities become integrated into the self-concept, with consequences for intergroup attitudes. The model specifies four concepts (self-concept, stereotypes, identification, and group compatibility) as associative connections. The model builds on two cognitive principles, balance-congruity and imbalance-dissonance, to predict identification with social groups that people currently belong to, belonged to in the past, or newly belong to. More precisely, the model suggests that the relative strength of self-group associations (i.e., identification) depends in part on the (in)compatibility of the different social groups. Combining insights into cognitive representation of knowledge, intergroup bias, and explicit/implicit attitude change, we further derive predictions for intergroup attitudes. We suggest that intergroup attitudes alter depending on the relative associative strength between the social groups and the self, which in turn is determined by the (in)compatibility between social groups. This model unifies existing models on the integration of social identities into the self-concept by suggesting that basic cognitive mechanisms play an important role in facilitating or hindering identity integration and thus contribute to reducing or increasing intergroup bias.}, language = {en} }