@article{Hommers1975,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried},
  title     = {Zur G{\"u}ltigkeit des objektiven Erwartungsmaximierungsmodells beim Entscheidungsverhalten von Schulkindern},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43784},
  year      = {1975},
  abstract  = {Fr{\"u}here Untersuchungen zum Entscheidungsverhalten von Kindern lassen zwei Interpretationen sogenannter lagebedingter Wahlen zu. Entscheidungen von 8- bis 14j{\"a}hrigen Sch{\"u}lern zeigten, daß sich lagebedingte Wahlen als orientiert am Erwartungsmaximum bezeichnen lassen. Die Beziehung zwischen Orientierung am Erwartungsmaximum und den Variablen Alter, Schulzugeh{\"o}rigkeit und Vorerfahrung erwies sich als positiv. Weiterhin konnte die Abh{\"a}ngigkeit der Wahlh{\"a}ufigkeit des Erwartungsmaximums von der Hervorgehobenheit des Erwartungsmaximums nachgewiesen werden. Die G{\"u}ltigkeit des objektiven Erwartungsmaximierungsmodells mußte aber wegen verschiedener Befunde eingeschr{\"a}nkt werden.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchumannSteinbornKuertenetal.,
  author    = {Schumann, Frank and Steinborn, Michael B. and K{\"u}rten, Jens and Cao, Liyu and H{\"a}ndel, Barbara Friederike and Huestegge, Lynn},
  title     = {Restoration of attention by rest in a multitasking world: theory, methodology, and empirical evidence},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867978},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267913},
  abstract  = {In this work, we evaluate the status of both theory and empirical evidence in the field of experimental rest-break research based on a framework that combines mental-chronometry and psychometric-measurement theory. To this end, we (1) provide a taxonomy of rest breaks according to which empirical studies can be classified (e.g., by differentiating between long, short, and micro-rest breaks based on context and temporal properties). Then, we (2) evaluate the theorizing in both the basic and applied fields of research and explain how popular concepts (e.g., ego depletion model, opportunity cost theory, attention restoration theory, action readiness, etc.) relate to each other in contemporary theoretical debates. Here, we highlight differences between all these models in the light of two symbolic categories, termed the resource-based and satiation-based model, including aspects related to the dynamics and the control (strategic or non-strategic) mechanisms at work. Based on a critical assessment of existing methodological and theoretical approaches, we finally (3) provide a set of guidelines for both theory building and future empirical approaches to the experimental study of rest breaks. We conclude that a psychometrically advanced and theoretically focused research of rest and recovery has the potential to finally provide a sound scientific basis to eventually mitigate the adverse effects of ever increasing task demands on performance and well-being in a multitasking world at work and leisure.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MatuzBirbaumerHautzingeretal.,
  author    = {Matuz, Tamara and Birbaumer, Niels and Hautzinger, Martin and K{\"u}bler, Andrea},
  title     = {Psychosocial adjustment to ALS: a longitudinal study},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  number    = {1197},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01197},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190208},
  abstract  = {For the current study the Lazarian stress-coping theory and the appendant model of psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disabilities (Pakenham, 1999) has shaped the foundation for identifying determinants of adjustment to ALS. We aimed to investigate the evolution of psychosocial adjustment to ALS and to determine its long-term predictors. A longitudinal study design with four measurement time points was therefore, used to assess patients' quality of life, depression, and stress-coping model related aspects, such as illness characteristics, social support, cognitive appraisals, and coping strategies during a period of 2 years. Regression analyses revealed that 55\% of the variance of severity of depressive symptoms and 47\% of the variance in quality of life at T2 was accounted for by all the T1 predictor variables taken together. On the level of individual contributions, protective buffering, and appraisal of own coping potential accounted for a significant percentage in the variance in severity of depressive symptoms, whereas problem management coping strategies explained variance in quality of life scores. Illness characteristics at T2 did not explain any variance of both adjustment outcomes. Overall, the pattern of the longitudinal results indicated stable depressive symptoms and quality of life indices reflecting a successful adjustment to the disease across four measurement time points during a period of about two years. Empirical evidence is provided for the predictive value of social support, cognitive appraisals, and coping strategies, but not illness parameters such as severity and duration for adaptation to ALS. The current study contributes to a better conceptualization of adjustment, allowing us to provide evidence-based support beyond medical and physical intervention for people with ALS.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StrackPauliWeyers,
  author    = {Strack, Fritz and Pauli, Paul and Weyers, Peter},
  title     = {Editorial: Emotion and Behavior},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  number    = {313},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00313},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190177},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EderRothermundHommel,
  author    = {Eder, Andreas B. and Rothermund, Klaus and Hommel, Bernhard},
  title     = {Commentary: Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  number    = {163},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00163},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190141},
  abstract  = {A commentary on "Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses" by Kozlik, J., Neumann, R., and Lozo, L. (2015). Front. Psychol. 6:563. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00563},
  language  = {en}
}