@article{DiersWagnerBaumetal.2019,
  author    = {Diers, J. and Wagner, J. and Baum, P. and Lichthardt, S. and Kastner, C. and Matthes, N. and L{\"o}b, S. and Matthes, H. and Germer, C.-T. and Wiegering, A.},
  title     = {Nationwide in-hospital mortality following colonic cancer resection according to hospital volume in Germany},
  series = {BJS Open},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {BJS Open},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1002/bjs5.50173},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204385},
  pages     = {672-677},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background: Colonic cancer is the most common cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine mortality rates following colonic cancer resection and the effect of hospital caseload on in-hospital mortality in Germany. Methods: Patients admitted with a diagnosis of colonic cancer undergoing colonic resection from 2012 to 2015 were identifed from a nationwide registry using procedure codes. The outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Hospitals were ranked according to their caseload for colonic cancer resection, and patients were categorized into five subgroups on the basis of hospital volume. Results: Some 129 196 colonic cancer resections were reviewed. The overall in-house mortality rate was 5⋅8 per cent, ranging from 6⋅9 per cent (1775 of 25 657 patients) in very low-volume hospitals to 4⋅8 per cent (1239 of 25 825) in very high-volume centres (P < 0⋅001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis the risk-adjusted odds ratio for in-house mortality was 0⋅75 (95 per cent c.i. 0⋅66 to 0⋅84) in very high-volume hospitals performing a mean of 85⋅0 interventions per year, compared with that in very low-volume hospitals performing a mean of only 12⋅7 interventions annually, after adjustment for sex, age, co-morbidity, emergency procedures, prolonged mechanical ventilation and transfusion. Conclusion: In Germany, patients undergoing colonic cancer resections in high-volume hospitals had with improved outcomes compared with patients treated in low-volume hospitals},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FlemmingHankirErnestusetal.2020,
  author    = {Flemming, S. and Hankir, M. and Ernestus, R.-I. and Seyfried, F. and Germer, C.-T. and Meybohm, P. and Wurmb, T. and Vogel, U. and Wiegering, A.},
  title     = {Surgery in times of COVID-19 — recommendations for hospital and patient management},
  series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  volume    = {405},
  journal   = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  issn      = {1435-2443},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00423-020-01888-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231766},
  pages     = {359-364},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2), has escalated rapidly to a global pandemic stretching healthcare systems worldwide to their limits. Surgeonshave had to immediately react to this unprecedented clinical challenge by systematically repurposing surgical wards. Purpose To provide a detailed set of guidelines developed in a surgical ward at University Hospital Wuerzburg to safelyaccommodate the exponentially rising cases of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients without compromising the care of emergencysurgery and oncological patients or jeopardizing the well-being of hospital staff. Conclusions The dynamic prioritization of SARS-CoV-2 infected and surgical patient groups is key to preserving life whilemaintaining high surgical standards. Strictly segregating patient groups in emergency rooms, non-intensive care wards andoperating areas prevents viral spread while adequately training and carefully selecting hospital staff allow them to confidentlyand successfully undertake their respective clinical duties.},
  language  = {en}
}