@article{KarimiFreundWageretal.2021, author = {Karimi, Sohail M. and Freund, Matthias and Wager, Brittney M. and Knoblauch, Michael and Fromm, J{\"o}rg and M. Mueller, Heike and Ache, Peter and Krischke, Markus and Mueller, Martin J. and M{\"u}ller, Tobias and Dittrich, Marcus and Geilfus, Christoph-Martin and Alfaran, Ahmed H. and Hedrich, Rainer and Deeken, Rosalia}, title = {Under salt stress guard cells rewire ion transport and abscisic acid signaling}, series = {New Phytologist}, volume = {231}, journal = {New Phytologist}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1111/nph.17376}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-259635}, pages = {1040-1055}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Soil salinity is an increasingly global problem which hampers plant growth and crop yield. Plant productivity depends on optimal water-use efficiency and photosynthetic capacity balanced by stomatal conductance. Whether and how stomatal behavior contributes to salt sensitivity or tolerance is currently unknown. This work identifies guard cell-specific signaling networks exerted by a salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant plant under ionic and osmotic stress conditions accompanied by increasing NaCl loads. We challenged soil-grown Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella salsuginea plants with short- and long-term salinity stress and monitored genome-wide gene expression and signals of guard cells that determine their function. Arabidopsis plants suffered from both salt regimes and showed reduced stomatal conductance while Thellungiella displayed no obvious stress symptoms. The salt-dependent gene expression changes of guard cells supported the ability of the halophyte to maintain high potassium to sodium ratios and to attenuate the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway which the glycophyte kept activated despite fading ABA concentrations. Our study shows that salinity stress and even the different tolerances are manifested on a single cell level. Halophytic guard cells are less sensitive than glycophytic guard cells, providing opportunities to manipulate stomatal behavior and improve plant productivity.}, language = {en} } @article{JonesHuangHedrichetal.2022, author = {Jones, Jeffrey J. and Huang, Shouguang and Hedrich, Rainer and Geilfus, Christoph-Martin and Roelfsema, M. Rob G.}, title = {The green light gap: a window of opportunity for optogenetic control of stomatal movement}, series = {New Phytologist}, volume = {236}, journal = {New Phytologist}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1111/nph.18451}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-293724}, pages = {1237 -- 1244}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Green plants are equipped with photoreceptors that are capable of sensing radiation in the ultraviolet-to-blue and the red-to-far-red parts of the light spectrum. However, plant cells are not particularly sensitive to green light (GL), and light which lies within this part of the spectrum does not efficiently trigger the opening of stomatal pores. Here, we discuss the current knowledge of stomatal responses to light, which are either provoked via photosynthetically active radiation or by specific blue light (BL) signaling pathways. The limited impact of GL on stomatal movements provides a unique option to use this light quality to control optogenetic tools. Recently, several of these tools have been optimized for use in plant biological research, either to control gene expression, or to provoke ion fluxes. Initial studies with the BL-activated potassium channel BLINK1 showed that this tool can speed up stomatal movements. Moreover, the GL-sensitive anion channel GtACR1 can induce stomatal closure, even at conditions that provoke stomatal opening in wild-type plants. Given that crop plants in controlled-environment agriculture and horticulture are often cultivated with artificial light sources (i.e. a combination of blue and red light from light-emitting diodes), GL signals can be used as a remote-control signal that controls stomatal transpiration and water consumption.}, language = {en} }