@phdthesis{Duechs2011,
  author    = {D{\"u}chs, Matthias},
  title     = {Effects of Toll-like receptor agonists on the pathogenesis of atopic asthma in mice},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-66369},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {In the last decades, both the incidence and the severity of asthma have steadily increased. Furthermore, available therapies only treat the symptoms but do not cure the disease. Immune modulation induced by TLR agonists may be a promising novel approach to effectively treat asthma as it targets the underlying immunopathology directly rather than one mediator alone. The aim of this thesis was to investigate if the immunostimulatory properties of Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists can be utilized to develop novel therapeutic intervention strategies for the treatment of asthma using murine models of allergic inflammation. For this purpose five different TLR agonists were tested in preclinical mouse models of acute and chronic asthma, both in preventive and therapeutic settings. Firstly, TLR-2, 3, 4, 7/8 and 9 agonists were delivered intratracheally at different doses before pulmonary allergen exposure in the asthma model of acute inflammation. TLR9 agonist CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG) > TLR7 agonist Resiquimod (R848) > TLR3 agonists poly(I:C) strongly reduced allergen induced airway eosinophilia and IL-4 levels in a dose-dependent manner. All TLR agonists increased neutrophil numbers, TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS) > TLR2 agonist lipoteichonic acid (LTA) > poly(I:C) > CpG > R848 and, with the exception of R848, the amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the airways. Suppressive effects were not dependent upon IFN-γ and IL-10 or associated with increased numbers of regulatory T cells in the airways. All TLR agonists, except LTA, similarly reduced airway eosinophilia and IL-4 levels when applied therapeutically after allergen challenge. These results show that the TLR agonists have different suppressive effects on TH2 responses in the airways which further depend on the dose and the experimental setup in which they were tested. Interestingly, all agonists induced airway neutrophilia, albeit to different degrees, raising the question if TLR ligands are safe for human use when applied directly into the lung. Different TLR agonists are also being developed for human use as adjuvants combined with allergen in specific immunotherapy. Recent clinical data suggest that this may be achieved by induction of allergen-specific TH1 responses. For this reason, the ability of different TLR agonists to induce allergen-specific TH1 and suppress allergen-specific TH2 responses in a preclinical setting was investigated in this thesis. Different doses of the TLR agonists were applied together with allergen, then mice were exposed to allergen aerosol. CpG > LPS >LTA dose-dependently strongly suppressed the development of airway eosinophilia with poly(I:C) and R848 having no effect. The decrease in eosinophilic numbers was associated withincreased neutrophils present in the airways. IL-4 and IL-5 levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were also decreased when poly(I:C), LPS, and CpG were used. All TLR agonists increased allergen-specific IgG2a, and with the exception of poly(I:C), reduced allergen-specific IgE levels in the serum. Cutaneous anaphylaxis to allergen was completely prevented when LPS or CpG were given as adjuvant. The strongest TH1 responses were induced by CpG and poly(I:C), characterized by the presence of IFN-γ in the bronchoalveolar lavage and the highest allergen-specific IgG2a levels in the serum. This data supports approaches to use TLR9 or TLR4 agonists for human therapy as adjuvant in combination with allergen in novel specific immunotherapy formulations. In the last part of the thesis, it was investigated if TLR activation can also affect the pathology of severe chronic asthma. Therapeutic administration of R848 or CpG reduced features of inflammation and remodeling. Both agonists showed superior effects to dexamethasone, with CpG being more efficient than R848. This result again supports a TLR9-based therapy as a viable option for the treatment of severe chronic asthma which may present a potential alternative for anti-inflammatory therapy with steroids. Taken together, the results of this thesis support the use of TLR agonists to treat asthma. The most favorable efficacy/safety ratio is to be expected from TLR-based therapies combining TLR4 or TLR9 agonists with allergen in specific immunotherapy. In regard to TLR agonist monotherapy, R848 and CpG showed the most promising profiles, CpG particularly in a model of severe chronic asthma. However, since all TLR agonists used in this study also showed pro-inflammatory potential, the safety aspect of such an approach needs to be taken into account.},
  subject      = {Toll-like Rezeptor},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Gogishvili2006,
  author    = {Gogishvili, Tea},
  title     = {Immunotherapy of allergic disorders in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-19304},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Allergische Erkrankungen sind St{\"o}rungen, bei denen es zu Immunfehlregulationen kommt und die bei empf{\"a}nglichen Individuen zur Entstehung von Allergen spezifischen T-Helfer 2 (TH2) Immunantworten f{\"u}hren. Neuere Untersuchungen deuten darauf hin, dass die f{\"u}r Soforttypallergien charakteristischen TH2 Immunantworten sowohl durch nat{\"u}rlich vorkommende CD4+CD25+ regulatorische T Zellen (Treg) als auch durch Antigen induzierte IL-10-secreting CD4+ regulatorische T Zellen kontrolliert werden k{\"o}nnen. Weiterhin gibt es Hinweise, dass eine erfolgreiche Allergen spezifische Immuntherapie {\"u}ber die Induktion von IL-10 sezernierenden T reg Zellen vermittelt wird. In ersten Teil der Arbeit wird die Effizienz einer Allergen spezifischen Immuntherapie (SIT) in einem Mausmodel f{\"u}r allergische Atemwegsentz{\"u}ndung demonstriert. Als Allergieparameter wurden Allergen spezifisches IgE im Serum, verschiedene TH1 und TH2 Cytokine in der brochoalveol{\"a}ren Lavage Fl{\"u}ssigkeit und nach in vitro Restimulation in Milzzellen untersucht. Weiterhin wurden Histologien von Lungengewebe angefertigt, um das eosinophile Entz{\"u}ndungsinfiltrat und die Asthma typische Becherzellmetaplasie darzustellen. Weiterhin wurden durch FACS Untersuchungen regulatorische T Zellen nachgewiesen. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass im Mausmodell die intranasale Applikationsform der SIT die allergischen Symptome effizienter bek{\"a}mpfen konnte, als die beim Menschen etablierte subcutane Applikationsform. Um Mechanismen zu definieren die eine SIT effizienter machen k{\"o}nnten wurde ein IL-4/IL13 Inhibitor (QY) als Adjuvans f{\"u}r die SIT benutzt. F{\"u}r den Zytokininhibitor konnte gezeigt werden, dass bei einer Applikation w{\"a}hrend der allergischen Sensibilisierung die Entstehung einer TH2 Immunantwort und die Ausbildung allergischer Symptome verhindert wird. Die Applikation des Inhibitors zusammen mit einer SIT zeigte jedoch keine zus{\"a}tzlichen signifikanten antiallergischen Effekte im Vergleich zur Durchf{\"u}hrung der SIT als Monotherapie. Diese Ergebnisse deuten m{\"o}glicherweise daraufhin , dass der bekannte Wechsel einer TH2 Immunantwort zu einer TH1 Antwort w{\"a}hrend der SIT nicht der Schl{\"u}sselmechanismus zu einer erfolgreichen Behandlung ist. Insbesondere weil unter der SIT auch in unserem Mausmodell die Induktion von IL-10 sezernierenden CD4+ T regulatorischen Zellen mit der Suppression der allergischen Atemwegsentz{\"u}dnung vergesellschaftet waren, so dass m{\"o}glicherwiese diese Zellen f{\"u}r den Therapieerfolg relevant sind . Um die Rolle regulatorischer T Zellen im Allergiemodell n{\"a}her zu beleuchten wurde im 2. Teil der Arbeit ein monoklonaler superagonistischer anti-CD28 Antik{\"o}rper benutzt, von dem bekannt ist dass T regulatorische Zellen in vivo induziert werden. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Applikation des Antik{\"o}rpers w{\"a}hrend der allergischen Sensibilisierung die Etablierung einer TH2 Immunantwort verst{\"a}rkte. Im Gegensatz dazu wurden durch die therapeutische Applikation des anti CD28 Antik{\"o}rpers in einer etablierten Allergie, IL-10 sezernierende CD4+CD25+ T Zellen induziert, welches mit einer Abschw{\"a}chung der gemessenen Allergieparameter einherging.},
  language  = {en}
}