@article{SenthilanHelfrichFoerster2016, author = {Senthilan, Pingkalai R. and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {Rhodopsin 7-The unusual Rhodopsin in Drosophila}, series = {PeerJ}, volume = {4}, journal = {PeerJ}, doi = {10.7717/peerj.2427}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177998}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Rhodopsins are the major photopigments in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila express six well-characterized Rhodopsins (Rh1-Rh6) with distinct absorption maxima and expression pattern. In 2000, when the Drosophila genome was published, a novel Rhodopsin gene was discovered: Rhodopsin 7 (Rh7). Rh7 is highly conserved among the Drosophila genus and is also found in other arthropods. Phylogenetic trees based on protein sequences suggest that the seven Drosophila Rhodopsins cluster in three different groups. While Rh1, Rh2 and Rh6 form a "vertebrate-melanopsin-type"-cluster, and Rh3, Rh4 and Rh5 form an "insect-type"-Rhodopsin cluster, Rh7 seem to form its own cluster. Although Rh7 has nearly all important features of a functional Rhodopsin, it differs from other Rhodopsins in its genomic and structural properties, suggesting it might have an overall different role than other known Rhodopsins.}, language = {en} } @article{WidmannArtingerBiesingeretal.2016, author = {Widmann, Annekathrin and Artinger, Marc and Biesinger, Lukas and Boepple, Kathrin and Peters, Christina and Schlechter, Jana and Selcho, Mareike and Thum, Andreas S.}, title = {Genetic Dissection of Aversive Associative Olfactory Learning and Memory in Drosophila Larvae}, series = {PLoS Genetics}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLoS Genetics}, number = {10}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1006378}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166672}, pages = {e1006378}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Memory formation is a highly complex and dynamic process. It consists of different phases, which depend on various neuronal and molecular mechanisms. In adult Drosophila it was shown that memory formation after aversive Pavlovian conditioning includes—besides other forms—a labile short-term component that consolidates within hours to a longer-lasting memory. Accordingly, memory formation requires the timely controlled action of different neuronal circuits, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators and molecules that were initially identified by classical forward genetic approaches. Compared to adult Drosophila, memory formation was only sporadically analyzed at its larval stage. Here we deconstruct the larval mnemonic organization after aversive olfactory conditioning. We show that after odor-high salt conditioning larvae form two parallel memory phases; a short lasting component that depends on cyclic adenosine 3'5'-monophosphate (cAMP) signaling and synapsin gene function. In addition, we show for the first time for Drosophila larvae an anesthesia resistant component, which relies on radish and bruchpilot gene function, protein kinase C activity, requires presynaptic output of mushroom body Kenyon cells and dopamine function. Given the numerical simplicity of the larval nervous system this work offers a unique prospect for studying memory formation of defined specifications, at full-brain scope with single-cell, and single-synapse resolution.}, language = {en} } @article{VazeHelfrichFoerster2016, author = {Vaze, Koustubh M. and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {Drosophila ezoana uses an hour-glass or highly damped circadian clock for measuring night length and inducing diapause}, series = {Physiological Entomology}, volume = {41}, journal = {Physiological Entomology}, number = {4}, doi = {10.1111/phen.12165}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204278}, pages = {378-389}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Insects inhabiting the temperate zones measure seasonal changes in day or night length to enter the overwintering diapause. Diapause induction occurs after the duration of the night exceeds a critical night length (CNL). Our understanding of the time measurement mechanisms is continuously evolving subsequent to B{\"u}nning's proposal that circadian systems play the clock role in photoperiodic time measurement (B{\"u}nning, 1936). Initially, the photoperiodic clocks were considered to be either based on circadian oscillators or on simple hour-glasses, depending on 'positive' or 'negative' responses in Nanda-Hamner and B{\"u}nsow experiments (Nanda \& Hammer, 1958; B{\"u}nsow, 1960). However, there are also species whose responses can be regarded as neither 'positive', nor as 'negative', such as the Northern Drosophila species Drosophila ezoana, which is investigated in the present study. In addition, modelling efforts show that the 'positive' and 'negative' Nanda-Hamner responses can also be provoked by circadian oscillators that are damped to different degrees: animals with highly sustained circadian clocks will respond 'positive' and those with heavily damped circadian clocks will respond 'negative'. In the present study, an experimental assay is proposed that characterizes the photoperiodic oscillators by determining the effects of non-24-h light/dark cycles (T-cycles) on critical night length. It is predicted that there is (i) a change in the critical night length as a function of T-cycle period in sustained-oscillator-based clocks and (ii) a fxed night-length measurement (i.e. no change in critical night length) in damped-oscillator-based clocks. Drosophila ezoana flies show a critical night length of approximately 7 h irrespective of T-cycle period, suggesting a damped-oscillator-based photoperiodic clock. The conclusion is strengthened by activity recordings revealing that the activity rhythm of D. ezoana flies also dampens in constant darkness.}, language = {en} }