@article{KoehlerHendricksKastneretal.2021,
  author    = {K{\"o}hler, Franziska and Hendricks, Anne and Kastner, Carolin and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Boerner, Kevin and Wagner, Johanna C. and Lock, Johan F. and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Laparoscopic appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis-a systematic review},
  series = {International Journal of Colorectal Disease},
  volume    = {36},
  journal   = {International Journal of Colorectal Disease},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {1432-1262},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00384-021-03927-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266616},
  pages     = {2283-2286},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background Over the last years, laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively replaced open appendectomy and become the current gold standard treatment for suspected, uncomplicated appendicitis. At the same time, though, it is an ongoing discussion that antibiotic therapy can be an equivalent treatment for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the safety and efficacy of antibiotic therapy and compare it to the laparoscopic appendectomy for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis. Methods The PubMed database, Embase database, and Cochrane library were scanned for studies comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection and data extraction. The primary endpoint was defined as successful treatment of appendicitis. Secondary endpoints were pain intensity, duration of hospitalization, absence from work, and incidence of complications. Results No studies were found that exclusively compared laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis. Conclusions To date, there are no studies comparing antibiotic treatment to laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, thus emphasizing the lack of evidence and need for further investigation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Reimer2017,
  author    = {Reimer, Anastasija},
  title     = {Search for novel antimicrobials against \(Neisseria\) \(gonorrhoeae\) and \(Chlamydia\) \(trachomatis\)},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143168},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The obligate human pathogen Neisseria gonorrhoeae is responsible for the widespread sexually transmitted disease gonorrhoea, which in rare cases also leads to the development of disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI). DGI is mediated by PorBIA-expressing bacteria that invade host cells under low phosphate condition by interaction with the scavenger receptor-1 (SREC-I) expressed on the surface of endothelial cells. The interaction of PorBIA and SREC-I was analysed using different in vitro approaches, including surface plasmon resonance experiments that revealed a direct phosphate-independent high affinity interaction of SREC-I to PorBIA. However, the same binding affinity was also found for the other allele PorBIB, which indicates unspecific binding and suggests that the applied methods were unsuitable for this interaction analysis. Since N. gonorrhoeae was recently classified as a "super-bug" due to a rising number of antibiotic-resistant strains, this study aimed to discover inhibitors against the PorBIA-mediated invasion of N. gonorrhoeae. Additionally, inhibitors were searched against the human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis, which causes sexually transmitted infections as well as infections of the upper inner eyelid. 68 compounds, including plant-derived small molecules, extracts or pure compounds of marine sponges or sponge-associated bacteria and pipecolic acid derivatives, were screened using an automated microscopy based approach. No active substances against N. gonorrhoeae could be identified, while seven highly antichlamydial compounds were detected. The pipecolic acid derivatives were synthesized as potential inhibitors of the virulence-associated "macrophage infectivity potentiator" (MIP), which exhibits a peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPIase) enzyme activity. This study investigated the role of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae MIP during infection. The two inhibitors PipN3 and PipN4 decreased the PPIase activity of recombinant chlamydial and neisserial MIP in a dose-dependent manner. Both compounds affected the chlamydial growth and development in epithelial cells. Furthermore, this work demonstrated the contribution of MIP to a prolonged survival of N. gonorrhoeae in the presence of neutrophils, which was significantly reduced in the presence of PipN3 and PipN4. SF2446A2 was one of the compounds that had a severe effect on the growth and development of C. trachomatis. The analysis of the mode of action of SF2446A2 revealed an inhibitory effect of the compound on the mitochondrial respiration and mitochondrial ATP production of the host cell. However, the chlamydial development was independent of proper functional mitochondria, which excluded the connection of the antichlamydial properties of SF2446A2 with its inhibition of the respiratory chain. Only the depletion of cellular ATP by blocking glycolysis and mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibited the chlamydial growth. A direct effect of SF2446A2 on C. trachomatis was assumed, since the growth of the bacteria N. gonorrhoeae and Staphylococcus aureus was also affected by the compound. In summary, this study identified the severe antichlamydial activity of plant-derived naphthoquinones and the compounds derived from marine sponges or sponge-associated bacteria SF2446A2, ageloline A and gelliusterol E. Furthermore, the work points out the importance of the MIP proteins during infection and presents pipecolic acid derivatives as novel antimicrobials against N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis.},
  subject      = {Neisseria gonorrhoeae},
  language  = {en}
}