@article{BassetCizekCuenoudetal.2015, author = {Basset, Yves and Cizek, Lukas and Cu{\´e}noud, Philippe and Didham, Raphael K. and Novotny, Vojtech and {\O}degaard, Frode and Roslin, Tomas and Tishechkin, Alexey K. and Schmidl, J{\"u}rgen and Winchester, Neville N. and Roubik, David W. and Aberlenc, Henri-Pierre and Bail, Johannes and Barrios, Hector and Bridle, Jonathan R. and Casta{\~n}o-Meneses, Gabriela and Corbara, Bruno and Curletti, Gianfranco and da Rocha, Wesley Duarte and De Bakker, Domir and Delabie, Jacques H. C. and Dejean, Alain and Fagan, Laura L. and Floren, Andreas and Kitching, Roger L. and Medianero, Enrique and de Oliveira, Evandro Gama and Orivel, Jerome and Pollet, Marc and Rapp, Mathieu and Ribeiro, Servio P. and Roisin, Yves and Schmidt, Jesper B. and S{\o}rensen, Line and Lewinsohn, Thomas M. and Leponce, Maurice}, title = {Arthropod Distribution in a Tropical Rainforest: Tackling a Four Dimensional Puzzle}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {10}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {12}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0144110}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-136393}, pages = {e0144110}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Quantifying the spatio-temporal distribution of arthropods in tropical rainforests represents a first step towards scrutinizing the global distribution of biodiversity on Earth. To date most studies have focused on narrow taxonomic groups or lack a design that allows partitioning of the components of diversity. Here, we consider an exceptionally large dataset (113,952 individuals representing 5,858 species), obtained from the San Lorenzo forest in Panama, where the phylogenetic breadth of arthropod taxa was surveyed using 14 protocols targeting the soil, litter, understory, lower and upper canopy habitats, replicated across seasons in 2003 and 2004. This dataset is used to explore the relative influence of horizontal, vertical and seasonal drivers of arthropod distribution in this forest. We considered arthropod abundance, observed and estimated species richness, additive decomposition of species richness, multiplicative partitioning of species diversity, variation in species composition, species turnover and guild structure as components of diversity. At the scale of our study (2km of distance, 40m in height and 400 days), the effects related to the vertical and seasonal dimensions were most important. Most adult arthropods were collected from the soil/litter or the upper canopy and species richness was highest in the canopy. We compared the distribution of arthropods and trees within our study system. Effects related to the seasonal dimension were stronger for arthropods than for trees. We conclude that: (1) models of beta diversity developed for tropical trees are unlikely to be applicable to tropical arthropods; (2) it is imperative that estimates of global biodiversity derived from mass collecting of arthropods in tropical rainforests embrace the strong vertical and seasonal partitioning observed here; and (3) given the high species turnover observed between seasons, global climate change may have severe consequences for rainforest arthropods.}, language = {en} } @article{MartinReinekingSeoetal.2015, author = {Martin, Emily A. and Reineking, Bj{\"o}rn and Seo, Bumsuk and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf}, title = {Pest control of aphids depends on landscape complexity and natural enemy interactions}, series = {PeerJ}, volume = {3}, journal = {PeerJ}, number = {e1095}, doi = {10.7717/peerj.1095}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-148393}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Aphids are a major concern in agricultural crops worldwide, and control by natural enemies is an essential component of the ecological intensification of agriculture. Although the complexity of agricultural landscapes is known to influence natural enemies of pests, few studies have measured the degree of pest control by different enemy guilds across gradients in landscape complexity. Here, we use multiple natural-enemy exclosures replicated in 18 fields across a gradient in landscape complexity to investigate (1) the strength of natural pest control across landscapes, measured as the difference between pest pressure in the presence and in the absence of natural enemies; (2) the differential contributions of natural enemy guilds to pest control, and the nature of their interactions across landscapes. We show that natural pest control of aphids increased up to six-fold from simple to complex landscapes. In the absence of pest control, aphid population growth was higher in complex than simple landscapes, but was reduced by natural enemies to similar growth rates across all landscapes. The effects of enemy guilds were landscape-dependent. Particularly in complex landscapes, total pest control was supplied by the combined contribution of flying insects and ground-dwellers. Birds had little overall impact on aphid control. Despite evidence for intraguild predation of flying insects by ground-dwellers and birds, the overall effect of enemy guilds on aphid control was complementary. Understanding pest control services at large spatial scales is critical to increase the success of ecological intensification schemes. Our results suggest that, where aphids are the main pest of concern, interactions between natural enemies are largely complementary and lead to a strongly positive effect of landscape complexity on pest control. Increasing the availability of seminatural habitats in agricultural landscapes may thus benefit not only natural enemies, but also the effectiveness of aphid natural pest control.}, language = {en} } @article{BartomeusPottsSteffanDewenteretal.2014, author = {Bartomeus, Ignasi and Potts, Simon G. and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Vaissiere, Bernard E. and Woyciechowski, Michal and Krewenka, Kristin M. and Tscheulin, Thomas and Roberts, Stuart P. M. and Szentgyoergyi, Hajnalka and Westphal, Catrin and Bommarco, Riccardo}, title = {Contribution of insect pollinators to crop yield and quality varies with agricultural intensification}, series = {PEERJ}, volume = {2}, journal = {PEERJ}, number = {e328}, issn = {2167-9843}, doi = {10.7717/peerj.328}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116928}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background. Up to 75\% of crop species benefit at least to some degree from animal pollination for fruit or seed set and yield. However, basic information on the level of pollinator dependence and pollinator contribution to yield is lacking for many crops. Even less is known about how insect pollination affects crop quality. Given that habitat loss and agricultural intensification are known to decrease pollinator richness and abundance, there is a need to assess the consequences for different components of crop production. Methods. We used pollination exclusion on flowers or inflorescences on a whole plant basis to assess the contribution of insect pollination to crop yield and quality in four flowering crops (spring oilseed rape, field bean, strawberry, and buckwheat) located in four regions of Europe. For each crop, we recorded abundance and species richness of flower visiting insects in ten fields located along a gradient from simple to heterogeneous landscapes. Results. Insect pollination enhanced average crop yield between 18 and 71\% depending on the crop. Yield quality was also enhanced in most crops. For instance, oilseed rape had higher oil and lower chlorophyll contents when adequately pollinated, the proportion of empty seeds decreased in buckwheat, and strawberries' commercial grade improved; however, we did not find higher nitrogen content in open pollinated field beans. Complex landscapes had a higher overall species richness of wild pollinators across crops, but visitation rates were only higher in complex landscapes for some crops. On the contrary, the overall yield was consistently enhanced by higher visitation rates, but not by higher pollinator richness. Discussion. For the four crops in this study, there is clear benefit delivered by pollinators on yield quantity and/or quality, but it is not maximized under current agricultural intensification. Honeybees, the most abundant pollinator, might partially compensate the loss of wild pollinators in some areas, but our results suggest the need of landscape-scale actions to enhance wild pollinator populations.}, language = {en} } @article{BreezeVaissiereBommarcoetal.2014, author = {Breeze, Tom D. and Vaissiere, Bernhard E. and Bommarco, Riccardo and Petanidou, Theodora and Seraphides, Nicos and Kozak, Lajos and Scheper, Jeroen and Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. and Kleijn, David and Gyldenk{\ae}rne, Steen and Moretti, Marco and Holzschuh, Andrea and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Stout, Jane C. and P{\"a}rtel, Meelis and Zobel, Martin and Potts, Simon G.}, title = {Agricultural Policies Exacerbate Honeybee Pollination Service Supply-Demand Mismatches Across Europe}, series = {PLOS ONE}, volume = {9}, journal = {PLOS ONE}, number = {1}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0082996}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117692}, pages = {e82996}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Declines in insect pollinators across Europe have raised concerns about the supply of pollination services to agriculture. Simultaneously, EU agricultural and biofuel policies have encouraged substantial growth in the cultivated area of insect pollinated crops across the continent. Using data from 41 European countries, this study demonstrates that the recommended number of honeybees required to provide crop pollination across Europe has risen 4.9 times as fast as honeybee stocks between 2005 and 2010. Consequently, honeybee stocks were insufficient to supply >90\% of demands in 22 countries studied. These findings raise concerns about the capacity of many countries to cope with major losses of wild pollinators and highlight numerous critical gaps in current understanding of pollination service supplies and demands, pointing to a pressing need for further research into this issue.}, language = {en} } @article{HopfenmuellerSteffanDewenterHolzschuh2014, author = {Hopfenmueller, Sebastian and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Holzschuh, Andrea}, title = {Trait-Specific Responses of Wild Bee Communities to Landscape Composition, Configuration and Local Factors}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0104439}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-112872}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Land-use intensification and loss of semi-natural habitats have induced a severe decline of bee diversity in agricultural landscapes. Semi-natural habitats like calcareous grasslands are among the most important bee habitats in central Europe, but they are threatened by decreasing habitat area and quality, and by homogenization of the surrounding landscape affecting both landscape composition and configuration. In this study we tested the importance of habitat area, quality and connectivity as well as landscape composition and configuration on wild bees in calcareous grasslands. We made detailed trait-specific analyses as bees with different traits might differ in their response to the tested factors. Species richness and abundance of wild bees were surveyed on 23 calcareous grassland patches in Southern Germany with independent gradients in local and landscape factors. Total wild bee richness was positively affected by complex landscape configuration, large habitat area and high habitat quality (i.e. steep slopes). Cuckoo bee richness was positively affected by complex landscape configuration and large habitat area whereas habitat specialists were only affected by the local factors habitat area and habitat quality. Small social generalists were positively influenced by habitat area whereas large social generalists (bumblebees) were positively affected by landscape composition (high percentage of semi-natural habitats). Our results emphasize a strong dependence of habitat specialists on local habitat characteristics, whereas cuckoo bees and bumblebees are more likely affected by the surrounding landscape. We conclude that a combination of large high-quality patches and heterogeneous landscapes maintains high bee species richness and communities with diverse trait composition. Such diverse communities might stabilize pollination services provided to crops and wild plants on local and landscape scales.}, language = {en} } @article{RinawatiSteinLindner2013, author = {Rinawati, Fitria and Stein, Katharina and Lindner, Andr{\´e}}, title = {Climate change impacts on biodiversity-the setting of a lingering global crisis}, series = {Diversity}, volume = {5}, journal = {Diversity}, number = {1}, doi = {10.3390/d50100114}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131866}, pages = {114-123}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Climate change has created potential major threats to global biodiversity. The multiple components of climate change are projected to affect all pillars of biodiversity, from genes over species to biome level. Of particular concerns are "tipping points" where the exceedance of ecosystem thresholds will possibly lead to irreversible shifts of ecosystems and their functioning. As biodiversity underlies all goods and services provided by ecosystems that are crucial for human survival and wellbeing, this paper presents potential effects of climate change on biodiversity, its plausible impacts on human society as well as the setting in addressing a global crisis. Species affected by climate change may respond in three ways: change, move or die. Local species extinctions or a rapidly affected ecosystem as a whole respectively might move toward its particular "tipping point", thereby probably depriving its services to human society and ending up in a global crisis. Urgent and appropriate actions within various scenarios of climate change impacts on biodiversity, especially in tropical regions, are needed to be considered. Foremost a multisectoral approach on biodiversity issues with broader policies, stringent strategies and programs at international, national and local levels is essential to meet the challenges of climate change impacts on biodiversity.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Hsieh2011, author = {Hsieh, Samuel Yu-Lung}, title = {The diversity and ecology of the spider communities of European beech canopy}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-66966}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Ein wesentliches Ziel {\"o}kologischer Forschung ist es, die Frage zu beantworten, wie Arten koexistieren k{\"o}nnen und die biologische Vielfalt erhalten bleibt. Um zu verstehen, wie dabei Gemeinschaften in unterschiedlichen r{\"a}umlich-zeitlichen Dimensionen interagieren, um die biologische Vielfalt zu erhalten, ist ein umfassendes prozessorientiertes Wissen erforderlich. Demzufolge konzentrierte sich meine Studie im Wesentlichen auf die Biodiversit{\"a}t und die sie beeinflussenden raum-zeitlichen {\"o}kologischen Prozesse. Vergleicht man die {\"A}hnlich- bzw. Un{\"a}hnlichkeit der in verschieden alten Best{\"a}nden lebenden Spinnengemeinschaften der Buchen (Fagus sylvatica L.), dann zeigt sich, dass die {\"a}lteste Baumkohorte offensichtlich einzigartige Ressourcen besitzt, welche die Zusammensetzung der Spinnengemeinschaften deutlich pr{\"a}gen. {\"U}ber das Jahr hin zeigten die Spinnengemeinschaften trotz der jahreszeitlich unterschiedlich {\"o}kologischen Randbedingungen eine sich wiederholende, vorhersehbare Dynamik. Der Vergleich {\"u}ber die Jahre ergab, dass das "Neutrale Modell" und das "Nischen-Modell" gleichzeitig funktionieren k{\"o}nnen. Beide sind notwendig, um die Dynamik der in den Buchenkronen der verschiedenen Altersklassen lebenden Spinnengemeinschaften vollst{\"a}ndig erkl{\"a}ren zu k{\"o}nnen.}, subject = {Spinnen}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Goetzke2006, author = {G{\"o}tzke, Armin}, title = {Entwicklung einer Naturschutzkonzeption in Weinbaugebieten auf der Grundlage einer vergleichenden Untersuchung faunistischer und betriebswirtschaftlicher Parameter praxis{\"u}blich und {\"o}kologisch erzeugender Weinbaubetriebe}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-21989}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2006}, abstract = {1) Wenn der Erhalt der biologischen Vielfalt gesellschaftliche Zielvorgabe ist und daf{\"u}r landwirtschaftlich genutzte Fl{\"a}chen einbezogen werden sollen, sind Maßnahmen zu pr{\"a}ferieren, deren Opportunit{\"a}tskosten gering sind. Diese Arbeit stellt den Versuch dar, solche Maßnahmen am Beispielsystem „Weinbau" zu entwickeln. 2) Die Anbauform „Weinbau" ist f{\"u}r diese Studie aus folgenden Gr{\"u}nden besonders geeignet: Rebfl{\"a}chen sind an Standorte mit besonderen klimatischen Bedingungen gebunden, die ebenfalls f{\"u}r Lebensgemeinschaften von Bedeutung sind, die in Deutschland als besonders gef{\"a}hrdet gelten (thermophile und xerothermophile Gemeinschaften). Auch die speziellen, fr{\"u}her artenreichen „Weinbergsgesellschaften" (Flora und Fauna) verdienen besondere Beachtung; zudem ist in Unterfranken eine starke r{\"a}umliche Beziehung zwischen Naturschutzgebieten, die thermophile und xerothermophile Artengemeinschaften sch{\"u}tzen sollen, und umgebenden Rebfl{\"a}chen gegeben. Weiterhin erscheinen Rebfl{\"a}chen durch die Trennung der Anbaufl{\"a}che in die Bereiche „Zeile" (die den linienf{\"o}rmig angepflanzten Reben entspricht) und „Gasse" (ein etwa zwei Meter breiter Streifen zwischen den Zeilen) hervorragend geeignet, landwirtschaftliche Produktion und biodiversit{\"a}ts-orientierte Maßnahmen zu verbinden. 3) In der Region „Mainfranken" (Deutschland, Bayern) wurden drei Vergleichsfl{\"a}chenpaare in Ertragsrebfl{\"a}chen ausgew{\"a}hlt, die einerseits praxis{\"u}blich, andererseits nach den Vorschriften des „{\"o}kologischen Landbaus" i.S. des BML wirtschaften. 4) In der naturschutzfachlichen Analyse wurden folgende Gesellschaften der Vergleichsfl{\"a}chen faunistisch untersucht: bodenaktive (epig{\"a}ische) Spinnen (Araneae), Laufk{\"a}fer (Carabidae), Zikaden (Auchenorrhyncha) und Heuschrecken (Saltatoria). Im betriebswirtschaftlichen Teil wurde nach Literaturdaten und Arbeitstageb{\"u}chern die Außenwirtschaft der Weinbaubetriebe analysiert. Beide Datengruppen wurden zusammengef{\"u}hrt, um die Auswirkungen betrieblicher Maßnahmen der Außenwirtschaft sowohl im Hinblick auf ihre naturschutzfachliche als auch betriebswirtschaftliche Wirksamkeit zu ermitteln und hieraus Umstellungsstrategien im Weinbau abzuleiten. Zudem wurden die monet{\"a}ren Differenzen quantifiziert, um die H{\"o}he etwaiger Ausgleichszahlungen bestimmen zu k{\"o}nnen. 5) Die naturschutzfachliche Analyse zeigte, dass mit Ausnahme der Heuschrecken alle Gruppen eine starke F{\"o}rderung durch den {\"o}kologischen Anbau erfuhren; die F{\"o}rderung betraf sowohl die allgemeine Diversit{\"a}t wie naturschutzfachlich bedeutsame Arten. Diese Effekte konnten vor allem auf den Faktor „Einf{\"u}hrung einer struktur- und artenreichen Dauerbegr{\"u}nung" sowie auf die Etablierung ungest{\"o}rter R{\"u}ckzugsbereiche zur{\"u}ckgef{\"u}hrt werden. Die Ver{\"a}nderungen des Pflanzenschutzes wurden als nicht wirksam eingestuft, die Kupferbehandlungen im {\"o}kologischen Weinbau werden sogar als problematisch angesehen. Weiterhin wurde die Maßnahme „Mulchen" des {\"o}kologischen Weinbaus als problematische Maßnahme der Begr{\"u}nungspflege identifiziert. 6) Die betriebswirtschaftliche Analyse zeigte, dass f{\"u}r die Ertragssituation der Betriebe vor allem der Pflanzenschutz bedeutsam ist. Von der Einf{\"u}hrung einer Dauerbegr{\"u}nung gehen moderate Effekte aus, die zudem oftmals auf eine „Umstellungsphase" befristet sind. 7) In der Zusammenf{\"u}hrung beider Analysen wird ein Anbauschema vorgeschlagen, dass ein modifiziertes Begr{\"u}nungsmodell nach {\"o}kologischer Wirtschaftsweise mit einem modifizierten Pflanzenschutzsystem nach praxis{\"u}blicher Wirtschaftsweise kombiniert. Die Kalkulation eines solchen Systems zeigt, dass auf Ausgleichszahlungen verzichtet werden k{\"o}nnte, bzw. geleistete Zahlungen nicht als Kompensation i.e.S., sondern als Anreizzahlungen zu verstehen w{\"a}ren. 8) Die Notwendigkeit einer {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung des entwickelten Schemas in einem Konversionsexperiment wird dargelegt.}, language = {de} }