@article{ThomasMyers‐SmithBjorkmanetal.2019, author = {Thomas, H. J. D. and Myers-Smith, I. H. and Bjorkman, A. D. and Elmendorf, S. C. and Blok, D. and Cornelissen, J. H. C. and Forbes, B. C. and Hollister, R. D. and Normand, S. and Prev{\´e}y, J. S. and Rixen, C. and Schaepman-Strub, G. and Wilmking, M. and Wipf, S. and Cornwell, W. K. and Kattge, J. and Goetz, S. J. and Guay, K. C. and Alatalo, J. M. and Anadon-Rosell, A. and Angers-Blondin, S. and Berner, L. T. and Bj{\"o}rk, R. G. and Buchwal, A. and Buras, A. and Carbognani, M. and Christie, K. and Siegwart Collier, L. and Cooper, E. J. and Eskelinen, A. and Frei, E. R. and Grau, O. and Grogan, P. and Hallinger, M. and Heijmans, M. M. P. D. and Hermanutz, L. and Hudson, J. M. G. and H{\"u}lber, K. and Iturrate-Garcia, M. and Iversen, C. M. and Jaroszynska, F. and Johnstone, J. F. and Kaarlej{\"a}rvi, E. and Kulonen, A. and Lamarque, L. J. and L{\´e}vesque, E. and Little, C. J. and Michelsen, A. and Milbau, A. and Nabe-Nielsen, J. and Nielsen, S. S. and Ninot, J. M. and Oberbauer, S. F. and Olofsson, J. and Onipchenko, V. G. and Petraglia, A. and Rumpf, S. B. and Semenchuk, P. R. and Soudzilovskaia, N. A. and Spasojevic, M. J. and Speed, J. D. M. and Tape, K. D. and te Beest, M. and Tomaselli, M. and Trant, A. and Treier, U. A. and Venn, S. and Vowles, T. and Weijers, S. and Zamin, T. and Atkin, O. K. and Bahn, M. and Blonder, B. and Campetella, G. and Cerabolini, B. E. L. and Chapin III, F. S. and Dainese, M. and de Vries, F. T. and D{\´i}az, S. and Green, W. and Jackson, R. B. and Manning, P. and Niinemets, {\"U}. and Ozinga, W. A. and Pe{\~n}uelas, J. and Reich, P. B. and Schamp, B. and Sheremetev, S. and van Bodegom, P. M.}, title = {Traditional plant functional groups explain variation in economic but not size-related traits across the tundra biome}, series = {Global Ecology and Biogeography}, volume = {28}, journal = {Global Ecology and Biogeography}, doi = {10.1111/geb.12783}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-241310}, pages = {78-95}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Aim Plant functional groups are widely used in community ecology and earth system modelling to describe trait variation within and across plant communities. However, this approach rests on the assumption that functional groups explain a large proportion of trait variation among species. We test whether four commonly used plant functional groups represent variation in six ecologically important plant traits. Location Tundra biome. Time period Data collected between 1964 and 2016. Major taxa studied 295 tundra vascular plant species. Methods We compiled a database of six plant traits (plant height, leaf area, specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, leaf nitrogen, seed mass) for tundra species. We examined the variation in species-level trait expression explained by four traditional functional groups (evergreen shrubs, deciduous shrubs, graminoids, forbs), and whether variation explained was dependent upon the traits included in analysis. We further compared the explanatory power and species composition of functional groups to alternative classifications generated using post hoc clustering of species-level traits. Results Traditional functional groups explained significant differences in trait expression, particularly amongst traits associated with resource economics, which were consistent across sites and at the biome scale. However, functional groups explained 19\% of overall trait variation and poorly represented differences in traits associated with plant size. Post hoc classification of species did not correspond well with traditional functional groups, and explained twice as much variation in species-level trait expression. Main conclusions Traditional functional groups only coarsely represent variation in well-measured traits within tundra plant communities, and better explain resource economic traits than size-related traits. We recommend caution when using functional group approaches to predict tundra vegetation change, or ecosystem functions relating to plant size, such as albedo or carbon storage. We argue that alternative classifications or direct use of specific plant traits could provide new insights for ecological prediction and modelling.}, language = {en} } @article{DornelasAntaoMoyesetal.2018, author = {Dornelas, Maria and Ant{\~a}o, Laura H. and Moyes, Faye and Bates, Amanda E. and Magurran, Anne E. and Adam, Dušan and Akhmetzhanova, Asem A. and Appeltans, Ward and Arcos, Jos{\´e} Manuel and Arnold, Haley and Ayyappan, Narayanan and Badihi, Gal and Baird, Andrew H. and Barbosa, Miguel and Barreto, Tiago Egydio and B{\"a}ssler, Claus and Bellgrove, Alecia and Belmaker, Jonathan and Benedetti-Cecchi, Lisandro and Bett, Brian J. and Bjorkman, Anne D. and Błażewicz, Magdalena and Blowes, Shane A. and Bloch, Christopher P. Bloch and Bonebrake, Timothy C. and Boyd, Susan and Bradford, Matt and Brooks, Andrew J. and Brown, James H. and Bruelheide, Helge and Budy, Phaedra and Carvalho, Fernando and Casta{\~n}eda-Moya, Edward and Chen, Chaolun Allen and Chamblee, John F. and Chase, Tory J. and Siegwart Collier, Laura and Collinge, Sharon K. and Condit, Richard and Cooper, Elisabeth J. and Cornelissen, J. Hans C. and Cotano, Unai and Crow, Shannan Kyle and Damasceno, Gabriella and Davies, Claire H. and Davis, Robert A. and Day, Frank P. and Degraer, Steven and Doherty, Tim S. and Dunn, Timothy E. and Durigan, Giselda and Duffy, J. Emmett and Edelist, Dor and Edgar, Graham J. and Elahi, Robin and Elmendorf, Sarah C. and Enemar, Anders and Ernest, S. K. Morgan and Escribano, Rub{\´e}n and Estiarte, Marc and Evans, Brian S. and Fan, Tung-Yung and Turini Farah, Fabiano and Loureiro Fernandes, Luiz and Farneda, F{\´a}bio Z. and Fidelis, Alessandra and Fitt, Robert and Fosaa, Anna Maria and Franco, Geraldo Antonio Daher Correa and Frank, Grace E. and Fraser, William R. and Garc{\´i}a, Hernando and Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto and Givan, Or and Gorgone-Barbosa, Elizabeth and Gould, William A. and Gries, Corinna and Grossman, Gary D. and Gutierr{\´e}z, Julio R. and Hale, Stephen and Harmon, Mark E. and Harte, John and Haskins, Gary and Henshaw, Donald L. and Hermanutz, Luise and Hidalgo, Pamela and Higuchi, Pedro and Hoey, Andrew and Van Hoey, Gert and Hofgaard, Annika and Holeck, Kristen and Hollister, Robert D. and Holmes, Richard and Hoogenboom, Mia and Hsieh, Chih-hao and Hubbell, Stephen P. and Huettmann, Falk and Huffard, Christine L. and Hurlbert, Allen H. and Ivanauskas, Nat{\´a}lia Macedo and Jan{\´i}k, David and Jandt, Ute and Jażdżewska, Anna and Johannessen, Tore and Johnstone, Jill and Jones, Julia and Jones, Faith A. M. and Kang, Jungwon and Kartawijaya, Tasrif and Keeley, Erin C. and Kelt, Douglas A. and Kinnear, Rebecca and Klanderud, Kari and Knutsen, Halvor and Koenig, Christopher C. and Kortz, Alessandra R. and Kr{\´a}l, Kamil and Kuhnz, Linda A. and Kuo, Chao-Yang and Kushner, David J. and Laguionie-Marchais, Claire and Lancaster, Lesley T. and Lee, Cheol Min and Lefcheck, Jonathan S. and L{\´e}vesque, Esther and Lightfoot, David and Lloret, Francisco and Lloyd, John D. and L{\´o}pez-Baucells, Adri{\`a} and Louzao, Maite and Madin, Joshua S. and Magn{\´u}sson, Borgþ{\´o}r and Malamud, Shahar and Matthews, Iain and McFarland, Kent P. and McGill, Brian and McKnight, Diane and McLarney, William O. and Meador, Jason and Meserve, Peter L. and Metcalfe, Daniel J. and Meyer, Christoph F. J. and Michelsen, Anders and Milchakova, Nataliya and Moens, Tom and Moland, Even and Moore, Jon and Moreira, Carolina Mathias and M{\"u}ller, J{\"o}rg and Murphy, Grace and Myers-Smith, Isla H. and Myster, Randall W. and Naumov, Andrew and Neat, Francis and Nelson, James A. and Nelson, Michael Paul and Newton, Stephen F. and Norden, Natalia and Oliver, Jeffrey C. and Olsen, Esben M. and Onipchenko, Vladimir G. and Pabis, Krzysztof and Pabst, Robert J. and Paquette, Alain and Pardede, Sinta and Paterson, David M. and P{\´e}lissier, Rapha{\"e}l and Pe{\~n}uelas, Josep and P{\´e}rez-Matus, Alejandro and Pizarro, Oscar and Pomati, Francesco and Post, Eric and Prins, Herbert H. T. and Priscu, John C. and Provoost, Pieter and Prudic, Kathleen L. and Pulliainen, Erkki and Ramesh, B. R. and Ramos, Olivia Mendivil and Rassweiler, Andrew and Rebelo, Jose Eduardo and Reed, Daniel C. and Reich, Peter B. and Remillard, Suzanne M. and Richardson, Anthony J. and Richardson, J. Paul and van Rijn, Itai and Rocha, Ricardo and Rivera-Monroy, Victor H. and Rixen, Christian and Robinson, Kevin P. and Rodrigues, Ricardo Ribeiro and de Cerqueira Rossa-Feres, Denise and Rudstam, Lars and Ruhl, Henry and Ruz, Catalina S. and Sampaio, Erica M. and Rybicki, Nancy and Rypel, Andrew and Sal, Sofia and Salgado, Beatriz and Santos, Flavio A. M. and Savassi-Coutinho, Ana Paula and Scanga, Sara and Schmidt, Jochen and Schooley, Robert and Setiawan, Fakhrizal and Shao, Kwang-Tsao and Shaver, Gaius R. and Sherman, Sally and Sherry, Thomas W. and Siciński, Jacek and Sievers, Caya and da Silva, Ana Carolina and da Silva, Fernando Rodrigues and Silveira, Fabio L. and Slingsby, Jasper and Smart, Tracey and Snell, Sara J. and Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. and Souza, Gabriel B. G. and Souza, Flaviana Maluf and Souza, Vin{\´i}cius Castro and Stallings, Christopher D. and Stanforth, Rowan and Stanley, Emily H. and Sterza, Jos{\´e} Mauro and Stevens, Maarten and Stuart-Smith, Rick and Suarez, Yzel Rondon and Supp, Sarah and Tamashiro, Jorge Yoshio and Tarigan, Sukmaraharja and Thiede, Gary P. and Thorn, Simon and Tolvanen, Anne and Toniato, Maria Teresa Zugliani and Totland, {\O}rjan and Twilley, Robert R. and Vaitkus, Gediminas and Valdivia, Nelson and Vallejo, Martha Isabel and Valone, Thomas J. and Van Colen, Carl and Vanaverbeke, Jan and Venturoli, Fabio and Verheye, Hans M. and Vianna, Marcelo and Vieira, Rui P. and Vrška, Tom{\´a}š and Vu, Con Quang and Vu, Lien Van and Waide, Robert B. and Waldock, Conor and Watts, Dave and Webb, Sara and Wesołowski, Tomasz and White, Ethan P. and Widdicombe, Claire E. and Wilgers, Dustin and Williams, Richard and Williams, Stefan B. and Williamson, Mark and Willig, Michael R. and Willis, Trevor J. and Wipf, Sonja and Woods, Kerry D. and Woehler, Eric J. and Zawada, Kyle and Zettler, Michael L.}, title = {BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene}, series = {Global Ecology and Biogeography}, volume = {27}, journal = {Global Ecology and Biogeography}, doi = {10.1111/geb.12729}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222846}, pages = {760-786}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Motivation The BioTIME database contains raw data on species identities and abundances in ecological assemblages through time. These data enable users to calculate temporal trends in biodiversity within and amongst assemblages using a broad range of metrics. BioTIME is being developed as a community-led open-source database of biodiversity time series. Our goal is to accelerate and facilitate quantitative analysis of temporal patterns of biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Main types of variables included The database contains 8,777,413 species abundance records, from assemblages consistently sampled for a minimum of 2 years, which need not necessarily be consecutive. In addition, the database contains metadata relating to sampling methodology and contextual information about each record. Spatial location and grain BioTIME is a global database of 547,161 unique sampling locations spanning the marine, freshwater and terrestrial realms. Grain size varies across datasets from 0.0000000158 km2 (158 cm2) to 100 km2 (1,000,000,000,000 cm2). Time period and grain BioTIME records span from 1874 to 2016. The minimal temporal grain across all datasets in BioTIME is a year. Major taxa and level of measurement BioTIME includes data from 44,440 species across the plant and animal kingdoms, ranging from plants, plankton and terrestrial invertebrates to small and large vertebrates. Software format .csv and .SQL.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellerNossThornetal.2019, author = {M{\"u}ller, J{\"o}rg and Noss, Reed F. and Thorn, Simon and B{\"a}ssler, Claus and Leverkus, Alexandro B. and Lindenmayer, David}, title = {Increasing disturbance demands new policies to conserve intact forest}, series = {Conservation Letters}, volume = {12}, journal = {Conservation Letters}, doi = {10.1111/conl.12449}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-224256}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Ongoing controversy over logging the ancient Białowieża Forest in Poland symbolizes a global problem for policies and management of the increasing proportion of the earth's intact forest that is subject to postdisturbance logging. We review the extent of, and motivations for, postdisturbance logging in protected and unprotected forests globally. An unprecedented level of logging in protected areas and other places where green-tree harvest would not normally occur is driven by economic interests and a desire for pest control. To avoid failure of global initiatives dedicated to reducing the loss of species, five key policy reforms are necessary: (1) salvage logging must be banned from protected areas; (2) forest planning should address altered disturbance regimes for all intact forests to ensure that significant areas remain undisturbed by logging; (3) new kinds of integrated analyses are needed to assess the potential economic benefits of salvage logging against its ecological, economic, and social costs; (4) global and regional maps of natural disturbance regimes should be created to guide better spatiotemporal planning of protected areas and undisturbed forests outside reserves; and (5) improved education and communication programs are needed to correct widely held misconceptions about natural disturbances.}, language = {en} } @article{BahramAnslanHildebrandetal.2019, author = {Bahram, Mohammad and Anslan, Sten and Hildebrand, Falk and Bork, Peer and Tedersoo, Leho}, title = {Newly designed 16S rRNA metabarcoding primers amplify diverse and novel archaeal taxa from the environment}, series = {Environmental Microbiology Reports}, volume = {11}, journal = {Environmental Microbiology Reports}, doi = {10.1111/1758-2229.12684}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-221380}, pages = {487-494}, year = {2019}, abstract = {High-throughput studies of microbial communities suggest that Archaea are a widespread component of microbial diversity in various ecosystems. However, proper quantification of archaeal diversity and community ecology remains limited, as sequence coverage of Archaea is usually low owing to the inability of available prokaryotic primers to efficiently amplify archaeal compared to bacterial rRNA genes. To improve identification and quantification of Archaea, we designed and validated the utility of several primer pairs to efficiently amplify archaeal 16S rRNA genes based on up-to-date reference genes. We demonstrate that several of these primer pairs amplify phylogenetically diverse Archaea with high sequencing coverage, outperforming commonly used primers. Based on comparing the resulting long 16S rRNA gene fragments with public databases from all habitats, we found several novel family- to phylum-level archaeal taxa from topsoil and surface water. Our results suggest that archaeal diversity has been largely overlooked due to the limitations of available primers, and that improved primer pairs enable to estimate archaeal diversity more accurately.}, language = {en} } @article{MollKellnerLeonhardtetal.2018, author = {Moll, Julia and Kellner, Harald and Leonhardt, Sabrina and Stengel, Elisa and Dahl, Andreas and B{\"a}ssler, Claus and Buscot, Fran{\c{c}}ois and Hofrichter, Martin and Hoppe, Bj{\"o}rn}, title = {Bacteria inhabiting deadwood of 13 tree species are heterogeneously distributed between sapwood and heartwood}, series = {Environmental Microbiology}, volume = {20}, journal = {Environmental Microbiology}, doi = {10.1111/1462-2920.14376}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-224168}, pages = {3744-3756}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Deadwood represents an important structural component of forest ecosystems, where it provides diverse niches for saproxylic biota. Although wood-inhabiting prokaryotes are involved in its degradation, knowledge about their diversity and the drivers of community structure is scarce. To explore the effect of deadwood substrate on microbial distribution, the present study focuses on the microbial communities of deadwood logs from 13 different tree species investigated using an amplicon based deep-sequencing analysis. Sapwood and heartwood communities were analysed separately and linked to various relevant wood physico-chemical parameters. Overall, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria represented the most dominant phyla. Microbial OTU richness and community structure differed significantly between tree species and between sapwood and heartwood. These differences were more pronounced for heartwood than for sapwood. The pH value and water content were the most important drivers in both wood compartments. Overall, investigating numerous tree species and two compartments provided a remarkably comprehensive view of microbial diversity in deadwood.}, language = {en} } @article{HilmersFriessBaessleretal.2018, author = {Hilmers, Torben and Friess, Nicolas and B{\"a}ssler, Claus and Heurich, Marco and Brandl, Roland and Pretzsch, Hans and Seidl, Rupert and M{\"u}ller, J{\"o}rg}, title = {Biodiversity along temperate forest succession}, series = {Journal of Applied Ecology}, volume = {55}, journal = {Journal of Applied Ecology}, doi = {10.1111/1365-2664.13238}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-320632}, pages = {2756-2766}, year = {2018}, abstract = {1. The successional dynamics of forests—from canopy openings to regeneration, maturation, and decay—influence the amount and heterogeneity of resources available for forest-dwelling organisms. Conservation has largely focused only on selected stages of forest succession (e.g., late-seral stages). However, to develop comprehensive conservation strategies and to understand the impact of forest management on biodiversity, a quantitative understanding of how different trophic groups vary over the course of succession is needed. 2. We classified mixed mountain forests in Central Europe into nine successional stages using airborne LiDAR. We analysed α- and β-diversity of six trophic groups encompassing approximately 3,000 species from three kingdoms. We quantified the effect of successional stage on the number of species with and without controlling for species abundances and tested whether the data fit the more-individuals hypothesis or the habitat heterogeneity hypothesis. Furthermore, we analysed the similarity of assemblages along successional development. 3. The abundance of producers, first-order consumers, and saprotrophic species showed a U-shaped response to forest succession. The number of species of producer and consumer groups generally followed this U-shaped pattern. In contrast to our expectation, the number of saprotrophic species did not change along succession. When we controlled for the effect of abundance, the number of producer and saproxylic beetle species increased linearly with forest succession, whereas the U-shaped response of the number of consumer species persisted. The analysis of assemblages indicated a large contribution of succession-mediated β-diversity to regional γ-diversity. 4. Synthesis and applications. Depending on the species group, our data supported both the more-individuals hypothesis and the habitat heterogeneity hypothesis. Our results highlight the strong influence of forest succession on biodiversity and underline the importance of controlling for successional dynamics when assessing biodiversity change in response to external drivers such as climate change. The successional stages with highest diversity (early and late successional stages) are currently strongly underrepresented in the forests of Central Europe. We thus recommend that conservation strategies aim at a more balanced representation of all successional stages.}, language = {en} } @article{KoenigZundelKrimmeretal.2019, author = {K{\"o}nig, Kerstin and Zundel, Petra and Krimmer, Elena and K{\"o}nig, Christian and Pollmann, Marie and Gottlieb, Yuval and Steidle, Johannes L. M.}, title = {Reproductive isolation due to prezygotic isolation and postzygotic cytoplasmic incompatibility in parasitoid wasps}, series = {Ecology and Evolution}, volume = {9}, journal = {Ecology and Evolution}, doi = {10.1002/ece3.5588}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-222796}, pages = {10694-10706}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The reproductive barriers that prevent gene flow between closely related species are a major topic in evolutionary research. Insect clades with parasitoid lifestyle are among the most species-rich insects and new species are constantly described, indicating that speciation occurs frequently in this group. However, there are only very few studies on speciation in parasitoids. We studied reproductive barriers in two lineages of Lariophagus distinguendus (Chalcidoidea: Hymenoptera), a parasitoid wasp of pest beetle larvae that occur in human environments. One of the two lineages occurs in households preferably attacking larvae of the drugstore beetle Stegobium paniceum ("DB-lineage"), the other in grain stores with larvae of the granary weevil Sitophilus granarius as main host ("GW-lineage"). Between two populations of the DB-lineage, we identified slight sexual isolation as intraspecific barrier. Between populations from both lineages, we found almost complete sexual isolation caused by female mate choice, and postzygotic isolation, which is partially caused by cytoplasmic incompatibility induced by so far undescribed endosymbionts which are not Wolbachia or Cardinium. Because separation between the two lineages is almost complete, they should be considered as separate species according to the biological species concept. This demonstrates that cryptic species within parasitoid Hymenoptera also occur in Central Europe in close contact to humans.}, language = {en} } @article{HartkeSprengerSahmetal.2019, author = {Hartke, Juliane and Sprenger, Philipp P. and Sahm, Jacqueline and Winterberg, Helena and Orivel, J{\´e}r{\^o}me and Baur, Hannes and Beuerle, Till and Schmitt, Thomas and Feldmeyer, Barbara and Menzel, Florian}, title = {Cuticular hydrocarbons as potential mediators of cryptic species divergence in a mutualistic ant association}, series = {Ecology and Evolution}, volume = {9}, journal = {Ecology and Evolution}, doi = {10.1002/ece3.5464}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227857}, pages = {9160-9176}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Upon advances in sequencing techniques, more and more morphologically identical organisms are identified as cryptic species. Often, mutualistic interactions are proposed as drivers of diversification. Species of the neotropical parabiotic ant association between Crematogaster levior and Camponotus femoratus are known for highly diverse cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles, which in insects serve as desiccation barrier but also as communication cues. In the present study, we investigated the association of the ants' CHC profiles with genotypes and morphological traits, and discovered cryptic species pairs in both genera. To assess putative niche differentiation between the cryptic species, we conducted an environmental association study that included various climate variables, canopy cover, and mutualistic plant species. Although mostly sympatric, the two Camponotus species seem to prefer different climate niches. However in the two Crematogaster species, we could not detect any differences in niche preference. The strong differentiation in the CHC profiles may thus suggest a possible role during speciation itself either by inducing assortative mating or by reinforcing sexual selection after the speciation event. We did not detect any further niche differences in the environmental parameters tested. Thus, it remains open how the cryptic species avoid competitive exclusion, with scope for further investigations.}, language = {en} } @article{KendallRaderGagicetal.2019, author = {Kendall, Liam K. and Rader, Romina and Gagic, Vesna and Cariveau, Daniel P. and Albrecht, Matthias and Baldock, Katherine C. R. and Freitas, Breno M. and Hall, Mark and Holzschuh, Andrea and Molina, Francisco P. and Morten, Joanne M. and Pereira, Janaely S. and Portman, Zachary M. and Roberts, Stuart P. M. and Rodriguez, Juanita and Russo, Laura and Sutter, Louis and Vereecken, Nicolas J. and Bartomeus, Ignasi}, title = {Pollinator size and its consequences: Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects}, series = {Ecology and Evolution}, volume = {9}, journal = {Ecology and Evolution}, doi = {10.1002/ece3.4835}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-325705}, pages = {1702-1714}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Body size is an integral functional trait that underlies pollination-related ecological processes, yet it is often impractical to measure directly. Allometric scaling laws have been used to overcome this problem. However, most existing models rely upon small sample sizes, geographically restricted sampling and have limited applicability for non-bee taxa. Allometric models that consider biogeography, phylogenetic relatedness, and intraspecific variation are urgently required to ensure greater accuracy. We measured body size as dry weight and intertegular distance (ITD) of 391 bee species (4,035 specimens) and 103 hoverfly species (399 specimens) across four biogeographic regions: Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We updated existing models within a Bayesian mixed-model framework to test the power of ITD to predict interspecific variation in pollinator dry weight in interaction with different co-variates: phylogeny or taxonomy, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic region. In addition, we used ordinary least squares regression to assess intraspecific dry weight ~ ITD relationships for ten bees and five hoverfly species. Including co-variates led to more robust interspecific body size predictions for both bees and hoverflies relative to models with the ITD alone. In contrast, at the intraspecific level, our results demonstrate that the ITD is an inconsistent predictor of body size for bees and hoverflies. The use of allometric scaling laws to estimate body size is more suitable for interspecific comparative analyses than assessing intraspecific variation. Collectively, these models form the basis of the dynamic R package, "pollimetry," which provides a comprehensive resource for allometric pollination research worldwide.}, language = {en} } @article{HillaertHovestadtVandegehuchteetal.2018, author = {Hillaert, Jasmijn and Hovestadt, Thomas and Vandegehuchte, Martijn L. and Bonte, Dries}, title = {Size-dependent movement explains why bigger is better in fragmented landscapes}, series = {Ecology and Evolution}, volume = {8}, journal = {Ecology and Evolution}, doi = {10.1002/ece3.4524}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-320322}, pages = {10754-10767}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Body size is a fundamental trait known to allometrically scale with metabolic rate and therefore a key determinant of individual development, life history, and consequently fitness. In spatially structured environments, movement is an equally important driver of fitness. Because movement is tightly coupled with body size, we expect habitat fragmentation to induce a strong selection pressure on size variation across and within species. Changes in body size distributions are then, in turn, expected to alter food web dynamics. However, no consensus has been reached on how spatial isolation and resource growth affect consumer body size distributions. Our aim was to investigate how these two factors shape the body size distribution of consumers under scenarios of size-dependent and size-independent consumer movement by applying a mechanistic, individual-based resource-consumer model. We also assessed the consequences of altered body size distributions for important ecosystem traits such as resource abundance and consumer stability. Finally, we determined those factors that explain most variation in size distributions. We demonstrate that decreasing connectivity and resource growth select for communities (or populations) consisting of larger species (or individuals) due to strong selection for the ability to move over longer distances if the movement is size-dependent. When including size-dependent movement, intermediate levels of connectivity result in increases in local size diversity. Due to this elevated functional diversity, resource uptake is maximized at the metapopulation or metacommunity level. At these intermediate levels of connectivity, size-dependent movement explains most of the observed variation in size distributions. Interestingly, local and spatial stability of consumer biomass is lowest when isolation and resource growth are high. Finally, we highlight that size-dependent movement is of vital importance for the survival of populations or communities within highly fragmented landscapes. Our results demonstrate that considering size-dependent movement is essential to understand how habitat fragmentation and resource growth shape body size distributions—and the resulting metapopulation or metacommunity dynamics—of consumers.}, language = {en} }