@article{WeidemannSanchezNinoPoliteietal.2013, author = {Weidemann, Frank and Sanchez-Nino, Maria D. and Politei, Juan and Oliveira, Jo{\~a}o-Paulo and Wanner, Christoph and Warnock, David G. and Oritz, Alberto}, title = {Fibrosis: a key feature of Fabry disease with potential therapeutic implications}, series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, volume = {8}, journal = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, number = {116}, issn = {1750-1172}, doi = {10.1186/1750-1172-8-116}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-124773}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Fabry disease is a rare X-linked hereditary disease caused by mutations in the AGAL gene encoding the lysosomal enzyme alpha-galactosidase A. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is the current cornerstone of Fabry disease management. Involvement of kidney, heart and the central nervous system shortens life span, and fibrosis of these organs is a hallmark of the disease. Fibrosis was initially thought to result from tissue ischemia secondary to endothelial accumulation of glycosphingolipids in the microvasculature. However, despite ready clearance of endothelial deposits, ERT is less effective in patients who have already developed fibrosis. Several potential explanations of this clinical observation may impact on the future management of Fabry disease. Alternative molecular pathways linking glycosphingolipids and fibrosis may be operative; tissue injury may recruit secondary molecular mediators of fibrosis that are unresponsive to ERT, or fibrosis may represent irreversible tissue injury that limits the therapeutic response to ERT. We provide an overview of Fabry disease, with a focus on the assessment of fibrosis, the clinical consequences of fibrosis, and recent advances in understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis that may suggest novel therapeutic approaches to Fabry disease.}, language = {en} } @article{KunathKrauseWullichetal.2013, author = {Kunath, Frank and Krause, Steffen F. and Wullich, Bernd and Goebell, Peter J. and Engehausen, Dirk G. and Burger, Maximilian and Meerpohl, Joerg J. and Keck, Bastian}, title = {Bladder cancer - the neglected tumor: a descriptive analysis of publications referenced in MEDLINE and data from the register clinicaltrials.gov}, series = {BMC Urology}, volume = {13}, journal = {BMC Urology}, number = {56}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2490-13-56}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122133}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background: Uro-oncological neoplasms have both a high incidence and mortality rate and are therefore a major public health problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate research activity in uro-oncology over the last decade. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov systematically for studies on prostatic, urinary bladder, kidney, and testicular neoplasms. The increase in newly published reports per year was analyzed using linear regression. The results are presented with 95\% confidence intervals, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The number of new publications per year increased significantly for prostatic, kidney and urinary bladder neoplasms (all <0.0001). We identified 1,885 randomized controlled trials (RCTs); also for RCTs, the number of newly published reports increased significantly for prostatic (p = 0.001) and kidney cancer (p = 0.005), but not for bladder (p = 0.09) or testicular (p = 0.44) neoplasms. We identified 3,114 registered uro-oncological studies in ClinicalTrials.gov. However, 85\% of these studies are focusing on prostatic (45\%) and kidney neoplasms (40\%), whereas only 11\% were registered for bladder cancers. Conclusions: While the number of publications on uro-oncologic research rises yearly for prostatic and kidney neoplasms, urothelial carcinomas of the bladder seem to be neglected despite their important clinical role. Clinical research on neoplasms of the urothelial bladder must be explicitly addressed and supported.}, language = {en} }