@article{RueeggKriemlerZuercheretal.2017, author = {Rueegg, Corina S. and Kriemler, Susi and Zuercher, Simeon J. and Schindera, Christina and Renner, Andrea and Hebestreit, Helge and Meier, Christian and Eser, Prisca and von der Weid, Nicolas X.}, title = {A partially supervised physical activity program for adult and adolescent survivors of childhood cancer (SURfit): study design of a randomized controlled trial [NCT02730767]}, series = {BMC Cancer}, volume = {17}, journal = {BMC Cancer}, doi = {10.1186/s12885-017-3801-8}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-172497}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background: Beyond survival of nowadays >80\%, modern childhood cancer treatment strives to preserve long-term health and quality of life. However, the majority of today's survivors suffer from short- and long-term adverse effects such as cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, obesity, osteoporosis, fatigue, depression, and reduced physical fitness and quality of life. Regular exercise can play a major role to mitigate or prevent such late-effects. Despite this, there are no data on the effects of regular exercise in childhood cancer survivors from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). \(Primary\) \(outcome\) of the current RCT is therefore the effect of a 12-months exercise program on a composite cardiovascular disease risk score in childhood cancer survivors. \(Secondary\) \(outcomes\) are single cardiovascular disease risk factors, glycaemic control, bone health, body composition, physical fitness, physical activity, quality of life, mental health, fatigue and adverse events (safety). Methods: A total of 150 childhood cancer survivors aged ≥16 years and diagnosed ≥5 years prior to the study are recruited from Swiss paediatric oncology clinics. Following the baseline assessments patients are randomized 1:1 into an intervention and control group. Thereafter, they are seen at month 3, 6 and 12 for follow-up assessments. The intervention group is asked to add ≥2.5 h of intense physical activity/week, including 30 min of strength building and 2 h of aerobic exercises. In addition, they are told to reduce screen time by 25\%. Regular consulting by physiotherapists, individual web-based activity diaries, and pedometer devices are used as motivational tools for the intervention group. The control group is asked to keep their physical activity levels constant. Discussion: The results of this study will show whether a partially supervised exercise intervention can improve cardiovascular disease risk factors, bone health, body composition, physical activity and fitness, fatigue, mental health and quality of life in childhood cancer survivors. If the program will be effective, all relevant information of the SURfit physical activity intervention will be made available to interested clinics that treat and follow-up childhood cancer patients to promote exercise in their patients.}, language = {en} } @article{FitchettZinmanWanneretal.2016, author = {Fitchett, David and Zinman, Bernard and Wanner, Christoph and Lachin, John M. and Hantel, Stefan and Salsali, Afshin and Johansen, Odd Erik and Woerle, Hans J. and Broedl, Uli C. and Inzucchi, Silvio E.}, title = {Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME (R) trial}, series = {European Heart Journal}, volume = {37}, journal = {European Heart Journal}, number = {19}, doi = {10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188900}, pages = {1526-1534}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Aims We previously reported that in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) trial, empagliflozin added to standard of care reduced the risk of 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all-cause death, and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. We have now further investigated heart failure outcomes in all patients and in subgroups, including patients with or without baseline heart failure. Methods and results Patients were randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, or placebo. Seven thousand and twenty patients were treated; 706 (10.1\%) had heart failure at baseline. Heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death occurred in a significantly lower percentage of patients treated with empagliflozin 265/4687 patients (5.7\%)] than with placebo 198/2333 patients (8.5\%)] hazard ratio, HR: 0.66 (95\% confidence interval: 0.55-0.79); P < 0.001], corresponding to a number needed to treat to prevent one heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death of 35 over 3 years. Consistent effects of empagliflozin were observed across subgroups defined by baseline characteristics, including patients with vs. without heart failure, and across categories of medications to treat diabetes and/or heart failure. Empagliflozin improved other heart failure outcomes, including hospitalization for or death from heart failure 2.8 vs. 4.5\%; HR: 0.61 (0.47-0.79); P < 0.001] and was associated with a reduction in all-cause hospitalization 36.8 vs. 39.6\%; HR: 0.89 (0.82-0.96); P = 0.003]. Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported by a higher proportion of patients with vs. without heart failure at baseline in both treatment groups, but were no more common with empagliflozin than with placebo. Conclusion In patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk, empagliflozin reduced heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death, with a consistent benefit in patients with and without baseline heart failure.}, language = {en} }