@article{MajounieRentonMoketal.2012, author = {Majounie, Elisa and Renton, Alan E. and Mok, Kin and Dopper, Elise G. P. and Waite, Adrian and Rollinson, Sara and Chi{\`o}, Adriano and Restagno, Gabriella and Nicolaou, Nayia and Simon-Sanchez, Javier and van Swieten, John C. and Abramzon, Yevgeniya and Johnson, Janel O. and Sendtner, Michael and Pamphlett, Roger and Orrell, Richard W. and Mead, Simon and Sidle, Katie C. and Houlden, Henry and Rohrer, Jonathan D. and Morrison, Karen E. and Pall, Hardev and Talbot, Kevin and Ansorge, Olaf and Hernandez, Dena G. and Arepalli, Sampath and Sabatelli, Mario and Mora, Gabriele and Corbo, Massimo and Giannini, Fabio and Calvo, Andrea and Englund, Elisabet and Borghero, Giuseppe and Floris, Gian Luca and Remes, Anne M. and Laaksovirta, Hannu and McCluskey, Leo and Trojanowski, John Q. and Van Deerlin, Vivianna M. and Schellenberg, Gerard D. and Nalls, Michael A. and Drory, Vivian E. and Lu, Chin-Song and Yeh, Tu-Hsueh and Ishiura, Hiroyuki and Takahashi, Yuji and Tsuji, Shoji and Le Ber, Isabelle and Brice, Alexis and Drepper, Carsten and Williams, Nigel and Kirby, Janine and Shaw, Pamela and Hardy, John and Tienari, Pentti J. and Heutink, Peter and Morris, Huw R. and Pickering-Brown, Stuart and Traynor, Bryan J.}, title = {Frequency of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: a cross-sectional study}, series = {The Lancet Neurology}, volume = {11}, journal = {The Lancet Neurology}, doi = {10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70043-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-154644}, pages = {323 -- 330}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Background We aimed to accurately estimate the frequency of a hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9orf72 that has been associated with a large proportion of cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Methods We screened 4448 patients diagnosed with ALS (El Escorial criteria) and 1425 patients with FTD (Lund-Manchester criteria) from 17 regions worldwide for the GGGGCC hexanucleotide expansion using a repeat-primed PCR assay. We assessed familial disease status on the basis of self-reported family history of similar neurodegenerative diseases at the time of sample collection. We compared haplotype data for 262 patients carrying the expansion with the known Finnish founder risk haplotype across the chromosomal locus. We calculated age-related penetrance using the Kaplan-Meier method with data for 603 individuals with the expansion. Findings In patients with sporadic ALS, we identified the repeat expansion in 236 (7·0\%) of 3377 white individuals from the USA, Europe, and Australia, two (4·1\%) of 49 black individuals from the USA, and six (8·3\%) of 72 Hispanic individuals from the USA. The mutation was present in 217 (39·3\%) of 552 white individuals with familial ALS from Europe and the USA. 59 (6·0\%) of 981 white Europeans with sporadic FTD had the mutation, as did 99 (24·8\%) of 400 white Europeans with familial FTD. Data for other ethnic groups were sparse, but we identified one Asian patient with familial ALS (from 20 assessed) and two with familial FTD (from three assessed) who carried the mutation. The mutation was not carried by the three Native Americans or 360 patients from Asia or the Pacific Islands with sporadic ALS who were tested, or by 41 Asian patients with sporadic FTD. All patients with the repeat expansion had (partly or fully) the founder haplotype, suggesting a one-off expansion occurring about 1500 years ago. The pathogenic expansion was non-penetrant in individuals younger than 35 years, 50\% penetrant by 58 years, and almost fully penetrant by 80 years. Interpretation A common Mendelian genetic lesion in C9orf72 is implicated in many cases of sporadic and familial ALS and FTD. Testing for this pathogenic expansion should be considered in the management and genetic counselling of patients with these fatal neurodegenerative diseases.}, language = {en} } @article{JansonWillekeZaibertetal.2022, author = {Janson, Patrick and Willeke, Kristina and Zaibert, Lisa and Budnick, Andrea and Bergh{\"o}fer, Anne and Kittel-Schneider, Sarah and Heuschmann, Peter U. and Zapf, Andreas and Wildner, Manfred and Stupp, Carolin and Keil, Thomas}, title = {Mortality, morbidity and health-related outcomes in informal caregivers compared to non-caregivers: a systematic review}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, volume = {19}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, number = {10}, issn = {1660-4601}, doi = {10.3390/ijerph19105864}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-275219}, year = {2022}, abstract = {A systematic overview of mental and physical disorders of informal caregivers based on population-based studies with good methodological quality is lacking. Therefore, our aim was to systematically summarize mortality, incidence, and prevalence estimates of chronic diseases in informal caregivers compared to non-caregivers. Following PRISMA recommendations, we searched major healthcare databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and Web of Science) systematically for relevant studies published in the last 10 years (without language restrictions) (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020200314). We included only observational cross-sectional and cohort studies with low risk of bias (risk scores 0-2 out of max 8) that reported the prevalence, incidence, odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), mean- or sum-scores for health-related outcomes in informal caregivers and non-caregivers. For a thorough methodological quality assessment, we used a validated checklist. The synthesis of the results was conducted by grouping outcomes. We included 22 studies, which came predominately from the USA and Europe. Informal caregivers had a significantly lower mortality than non-caregivers. Regarding chronic morbidity outcomes, the results from a large longitudinal German health-insurance evaluation showed increased and statistically significant incidences of severe stress, adjustment disorders, depression, diseases of the spine and pain conditions among informal caregivers compared to non-caregivers. In cross-sectional evaluations, informal caregiving seemed to be associated with a higher occurrence of depression and of anxiety (ranging from 4 to 51\% and 2 to 38\%, respectively), pain, hypertension, diabetes and reduced quality of life. Results from our systematic review suggest that informal caregiving may be associated with several mental and physical disorders. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution, as the cross-sectional studies cannot determine temporal relationships. The lower mortality rates compared to non-caregivers may be due to a healthy-carer bias in longitudinal observational studies; however, these and other potential benefits of informal caregiving deserve further attention by researchers.}, language = {en} }