@article{GuckenbergerSweeneyFlickingeretal.2011, author = {Guckenberger, Matthias and Sweeney, Reinhart A. and Flickinger, John C. and Gerszten, Peter C. and Kersh, Ronald and Sheehan, Jason and Sahgal, Arjun}, title = {Clinical practice of image-guided spine radiosurgery - results from an international research consortium}, series = {Radiation Oncology}, volume = {6}, journal = {Radiation Oncology}, number = {172}, doi = {10.1186/1748-717X-6-172}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-138006}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Background Spinal radiosurgery is a quickly evolving technique in the radiotherapy and neurosurgical communities. However, the methods of spine radiosurgery have not been standardized. This article describes the results of a survey about the methods of spine radiosurgery at five international institutions. Methods All institutions are members of the Elekta Spine Radiosurgery Research Consortium and have a dedicated research and clinical focus on image-guided radiosurgery. The questionnaire consisted of 75 items covering all major steps of spine radiosurgery. Results Strong agreement in the methods of spine radiosurgery was observed. In particular, similarities were observed with safety and quality assurance playing an important role in the methods of all institutions, cooperation between neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists in case selection, dedicated imaging for target- and organ-at-risk delineation, application of proper safety margins for the target volume and organs-at-risk, conformal planning and precise image-guided treatment delivery, and close clinical and radiological follow-up. In contrast, three major areas of uncertainty and disagreement were identified: 1) Indications and contra-indications for spine radiosurgery; 2) treatment dose and fractionation and 3) tolerance dose of the spinal cord. Conclusions Results of this study reflect the current practice of spine radiosurgery in large academic centers. Despite close agreement was observed in many steps of spine radiosurgery, further research in form of retrospective and especially prospective studies is required to refine the details of spinal radiosurgery in terms of safety and efficacy.}, language = {en} } @article{BoetzlKonleKrauss2019, author = {Boetzl, Fabian A. and Konle, Antonia and Krauss, Jochen}, title = {Aphid cards - useful model for assessing predation rates or bias prone nonsense?}, series = {Journal of Applied Entomology}, volume = {144}, journal = {Journal of Applied Entomology}, number = {1-2}, doi = {10.1111/jen.12692}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204798}, pages = {74-80}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Predation on pest organisms is an essential ecosystem function supporting yields in modern agriculture. However, assessing predation rates is intricate, and they can rarely be linked directly to predator densities or functions. We tested whether sentinel prey aphid cards are useful tools to assess predation rates in the field. Therefore, we looked at aphid cards of different sizes on the ground level as well as within the vegetation. Additionally, by trapping ground-dwelling predators, we examined whether obtained predation rates could be linked to predator densities and traits. Predation rates recorded with aphid cards were independent of aphid card size. However, predation rates on the ground level were three times higher than within the vegetation. We found both predatory carabid activity densities as well as community weighted mean body size to be good predictors for predation rates. Predation rates obtained from aphid cards are stable over card type and related to predator assemblages. Aphid cards, therefore, are a useful, efficient method for rapidly assessing the ecosystem function predation. Their use might especially be recommended for assessments on the ground level and when time and resource limitations rule out more elaborate sentinel prey methods using exclosures with living prey animals.}, language = {en} }