@article{LudwigSaemannAlexanderetal.2013, author = {Ludwig, K. U. and S{\"a}mann, P. and Alexander, M. and Becker, J. and Bruder, J. and Moll, K. and Spieler, D. and Czisch, M. and Warnke, A. and Docherty, S. J. and Davis, O. S. P. and Plomin, R. and N{\"o}then, M. M. and Landerl, K. and M{\"u}ller-Myhsok, B. and Hoffmann, P. and Schumacher, J. and Schulte-K{\"o}rne, G. and Czamara, D.}, title = {A common variant in Myosin-18B contributes to mathematical abilities in children with dyslexia and intraparietal sulcus variability in adults}, series = {Translational Psychiatry}, volume = {3}, journal = {Translational Psychiatry}, number = {e229}, doi = {10.1038/tp.2012.148}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131513}, year = {2013}, abstract = {The ability to perform mathematical tasks is required in everyday life. Although heritability estimates suggest a genetic contribution, no previous study has conclusively identified a genetic risk variant for mathematical performance. Research has shown that the prevalence of mathematical disabilities is increased in children with dyslexia. We therefore correlated genome-wide data of 200 German children with spelling disability, with available quantitative data on mathematic ability. Replication of the top findings in additional dyslexia samples revealed that rs133885 was a genome-wide significant marker for mathematical abilities\((P_{comb}=7.71 x 10^{-10}, n=699)\), with an effect size of 4.87\%. This association was also found in a sample from the general population (P=0.048, n=1080), albeit with a lower effect size. The identified variant encodes an amino-acid substitution in MYO18B, a protein with as yet unknown functions in the brain. As areas of the parietal cortex, in particular the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), are involved in numerical processing in humans, we investigated whether rs133885 was associated with IPS morphology using structural magnetic resonance imaging data from 79 neuropsychiatrically healthy adults. Carriers of the MYO18B risk-genotype displayed a significantly lower depth of the right IPS. This validates the identified association between rs133885 and mathematical disability at the level of a specific intermediate phenotype.}, language = {en} } @article{AndersenBogstedDybkaretal.2015, author = {Andersen, Jens Peter and B{\o}gsted, Martin and Dybk{\ae}r, Karen and Mellqvist, Ulf-Henrik and Morgan, Gareth J. and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Einsele, Hermann and San Miguel, Jes{\´u}s and Palumbo, Antonio and Sonneveld, Pieter and Johnsen, Hans Erik}, title = {Global myeloma research clusters, output, and citations: a bibliometric mapping and clustering analysis}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {10}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0116966}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-144214}, pages = {e0116966}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background International collaborative research is a mechanism for improving the development of disease-specific therapies and for improving health at the population level. However, limited data are available to assess the trends in research output related to orphan diseases. Methods and Findings We used bibliometric mapping and clustering methods to illustrate the level of fragmentation in myeloma research and the development of collaborative efforts. Publication data from Thomson Reuters Web of Science were retrieved for 2005-2009 and followed until 2013. We created a database of multiple myeloma publications, and we analysed impact and co-authorship density to identify scientific collaborations, developments, and international key players over time. The global annual publication volume for studies on multiple myeloma increased from 1,144 in 2005 to 1,628 in 2009, which represents a 43\% increase. This increase is high compared to the 24\% and 14\% increases observed for lymphoma and leukaemia. The major proportion (> 90\% of publications) was from the US and EU over the study period. The output and impact in terms of citations, identified several successful groups with a large number of intra-cluster collaborations in the US and EU. The US-based myeloma clusters clearly stand out as the most productive and highly cited, and the European Myeloma Network members exhibited a doubling of collaborative publications from 2005 to 2009, still increasing up to 2013. Conclusion and Perspective Multiple myeloma research output has increased substantially in the past decade. The fragmented European myeloma research activities based on national or regional groups are progressing, but they require a broad range of targeted research investments to improve multiple myeloma health care.}, language = {en} }