@article{TretterMukherjeeMaricetal.2012, author = {Tretter, Verena and Mukherjee, Jayanta and Maric, Hans-Michael and Schindelin, Hermann and Sieghart, Werner and Moss, Stephen J.}, title = {Gephyrin, the enigmatic organizer at GABAergic synapses}, series = {Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience}, volume = {6}, journal = {Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience}, number = {23}, doi = {10.3389/fncel.2012.00023}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133356}, year = {2012}, abstract = {GABA(A) receptors are clustered at synaptic sites to achieve a high density of postsynaptic receptors opposite the input axonal terminals. This allows for an efficient propagation of GABA mediated signals, which mostly result in neuronal inhibition. A key organizer for inhibitory synaptic receptors is the 93 kDa protein gephyrin that forms oligomeric superstructures beneath the synaptic area. Gephyrin has long been known to be directly associated with glycine receptor beta subunits that mediate synaptic inhibition in the spinal cord. Recently, synaptic GABA(A) receptors have also been shown to directly interact with gephyrin and interaction sites have been identified and mapped within the intracellular loops of the GABA(A) receptor alpha 1, alpha 2, and alpha 3 subunits. Gephyrin-binding to GABA(A) receptors seems to be at least one order of magnitude weaker than to glycine receptors (GlyRs) and most probably is regulated by phosphorylation. Gephyrin not only has a structural function at synaptic sites, but also plays a crucial role in synaptic dynamics and is a platform for multiple protein-protein interactions, bringing receptors, cytoskeletal proteins and downstream signaling proteins into close spatial proximity.}, language = {en} } @article{KasaragodSchindelin2019, author = {Kasaragod, Vikram Babu and Schindelin, Hermann}, title = {Structure of Heteropentameric GABAA Receptors and Receptor-Anchoring Properties of Gephyrin}, series = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, issn = {1662-5099}, doi = {10.3389/fnmol.2019.00191}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-189308}, pages = {191}, year = {2019}, abstract = {γ-Aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs) mediate the majority of fast synaptic inhibition in the central nervous system (CNS). GABAARs belong to the Cys-loop superfamily of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGIC) and are assembled from 19 different subunits. As dysfunctional GABAergic neurotransmission manifests itself in neurodevelopmental disorders including epilepsy and anxiety, GABAARs are key drug targets. The majority of synaptic GABAARs are anchored at the inhibitory postsynaptic membrane by the principal scaffolding protein gephyrin, which acts as the central organizer in maintaining the architecture of the inhibitory postsynaptic density (iPSD). This interaction is mediated by the long intracellular loop located in between transmembrane helices 3 and 4 (M3-M4 loop) of the receptors and a universal receptor-binding pocket residing in the C-terminal domain of gephyrin. In 2014, the crystal structure of the β3-homopentameric GABAAR provided crucial information regarding the architecture of the receptor; however, an understanding of the structure and assembly of heteropentameric receptors at the atomic level was lacking. This review article will highlight recent advances in understanding the structure of heteropentameric synaptic GABAARs and how these structures have provided fundamental insights into the assembly of these multi-subunit receptors as well as their modulation by diverse ligands including the physiological agonist GABA. We will further discuss the role of gephyrin in the anchoring of synaptic GABAARs and glycine receptors (GlyRs), which are crucial for maintaining the architecture of the iPSD. Finally, we will also summarize how anti-malarial artemisinin drugs modulate gephyrin-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission.}, language = {en} } @article{KasaragodSchindelin2019, author = {Kasaragod, Vikram Babu and Schindelin, Hermann}, title = {Structure of heteropentameric GABA\(_A\) receptors and receptor-anchoring properties of gephyrin}, series = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, number = {191}, doi = {10.3389/fnmol.2019.00191}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201886}, year = {2019}, abstract = {γ-Aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA\(_A\)Rs) mediate the majority of fast synaptic inhibition in the central nervous system (CNS). GABA\(_A\)Rs belong to the Cys-loop superfamily of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels (pLGIC) and are assembled from 19 different subunits. As dysfunctional GABAergic neurotransmission manifests itself in neurodevelopmental disorders including epilepsy and anxiety, GABA\(_A\)Rs are key drug targets. The majority of synaptic GABA\(_A\)Rs are anchored at the inhibitory postsynaptic membrane by the principal scaffolding protein gephyrin, which acts as the central organizer in maintaining the architecture of the inhibitory postsynaptic density (iPSD). This interaction is mediated by the long intracellular loop located in between transmembrane helices 3 and 4 (M3-M4 loop) of the receptors and a universal receptor-binding pocket residing in the C-terminal domain of gephyrin. In 2014, the crystal structure of the β3-homopentameric GABA\(_A\)R provided crucial information regarding the architecture of the receptor; however, an understanding of the structure and assembly of heteropentameric receptors at the atomic level was lacking. This review article will highlight recent advances in understanding the structure of heteropentameric synaptic GABA\(_A\)Rs and how these structures have provided fundamental insights into the assembly of these multi-subunit receptors as well as their modulation by diverse ligands including the physiological agonist GABA. We will further discuss the role of gephyrin in the anchoring of synaptic GABA\(_A\)Rs and glycine receptors (GlyRs), which are crucial for maintaining the architecture of the iPSD. Finally, we will also summarize how anti-malarial artemisinin drugs modulate gephyrin-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission.}, language = {en} } @article{KhayenkoMaric2019, author = {Khayenko, Vladimir and Maric, Hans Michael}, title = {Targeting GABA\(_A\)R-associated proteins: new modulators, labels and concepts}, series = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, volume = {12}, journal = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, number = {162}, doi = {10.3389/fnmol.2019.00162}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201876}, year = {2019}, abstract = {γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA\(_A\)Rs) are the major mediators of synaptic inhibition in the brain. Aberrant GABA\(_A\)R activity or regulation is observed in various neurodevelopmental disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and mental illnesses, including epilepsy, Alzheimer's and schizophrenia. Benzodiazepines, anesthetics and other pharmaceutics targeting these receptors find broad clinical use, but their inherent lack of receptor subtype specificity causes unavoidable side effects, raising a need for new or adjuvant medications. In this review article, we introduce a new strategy to modulate GABAeric signaling: targeting the intracellular protein interactors of GABA\(_A\)Rs. Of special interest are scaffolding, anchoring and supporting proteins that display high GABA\(_A\)R subtype specificity. Recent efforts to target gephyrin, the major intracellular integrator of GABAergic signaling, confirm that GABA\(_A\)R-associated proteins can be successfully targeted through diverse molecules, including recombinant proteins, intrabodies, peptide-based probes and small molecules. Small-molecule artemisinins and peptides derived from endogenous interactors, that specifically target the universal receptor binding site of gephyrin, acutely affect synaptic GABA\(_A\)R numbers and clustering, modifying neuronal transmission. Interference with GABA\(_A\)R trafficking provides another way to modulate inhibitory signaling. Peptides blocking the binding site of GABA\(_A\)R to AP2 increase the surface concentration of GABA\(_A\)R clusters and enhance GABAergic signaling. Engineering of gephyrin binding peptides delivered superior means to interrogate neuronal structure and function. Fluorescent peptides, designed from gephyrin binders, enable live neuronal staining and visualization of gephyrin in the post synaptic sites with submicron resolution. We anticipate that in the future, novel fluorescent probes, with improved size and binding efficiency, may find wide application in super resolution microscopy studies, enlightening the nanoscale architecture of the inhibitory synapse. Broader studies on GABA\(_A\)R accessory proteins and the identification of the exact molecular binding interfaces and affinities will advance the development of novel GABA\(_A\)R modulators and following in vivo studies will reveal their clinical potential as adjuvant or stand-alone drugs.}, language = {en} } @article{PiroEckesKasaragodetal.2021, author = {Piro, Inken and Eckes, Anna-Lena and Kasaragod, Vikram Babu and Sommer, Claudia and Harvey, Robert J. and Schaefer, Natascha and Villmann, Carmen}, title = {Novel Functional Properties of Missense Mutations in the Glycine Receptor β Subunit in Startle Disease}, series = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, volume = {14}, journal = {Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience}, issn = {1662-5099}, doi = {10.3389/fnmol.2021.745275}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-246676}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Startle disease is a rare disorder associated with mutations in GLRA1 and GLRB, encoding glycine receptor (GlyR) α1 and β subunits, which enable fast synaptic inhibitory transmission in the spinal cord and brainstem. The GlyR β subunit is important for synaptic localization via interactions with gephyrin and contributes to agonist binding and ion channel conductance. Here, we have studied three GLRB missense mutations, Y252S, S321F, and A455P, identified in startle disease patients. For Y252S in M1 a disrupted stacking interaction with surrounding aromatic residues in M3 and M4 is suggested which is accompanied by an increased EC\(_{50}\) value. By contrast, S321F in M3 might stabilize stacking interactions with aromatic residues in M1 and M4. No significant differences in glycine potency or efficacy were observed for S321F. The A455P variant was not predicted to impact on subunit folding but surprisingly displayed increased maximal currents which were not accompanied by enhanced surface expression, suggesting that A455P is a gain-of-function mutation. All three GlyR β variants are trafficked effectively with the α1 subunit through intracellular compartments and inserted into the cellular membrane. In vivo, the GlyR β subunit is transported together with α1 and the scaffolding protein gephyrin to synaptic sites. The interaction of these proteins was studied using eGFP-gephyrin, forming cytosolic aggregates in non-neuronal cells. eGFP-gephyrin and β subunit co-expression resulted in the recruitment of both wild-type and mutant GlyR β subunits to gephyrin aggregates. However, a significantly lower number of GlyR β aggregates was observed for Y252S, while for mutants S321F and A455P, the area and the perimeter of GlyR β subunit aggregates was increased in comparison to wild-type β. Transfection of hippocampal neurons confirmed differences in GlyR-gephyrin clustering with Y252S and A455P, leading to a significant reduction in GlyR β-positive synapses. Although none of the mutations studied is directly located within the gephyrin-binding motif in the GlyR β M3-M4 loop, we suggest that structural changes within the GlyR β subunit result in differences in GlyR β-gephyrin interactions. Hence, we conclude that loss- or gain-of-function, or alterations in synaptic GlyR clustering may underlie disease pathology in startle disease patients carrying GLRB mutations.}, language = {en} } @article{ImamChoudhuryHeinzeetal.2022, author = {Imam, Nasir and Choudhury, Susobhan and Heinze, Katrin G. and Schindelin, Hermann}, title = {Differential modulation of collybistin conformational dynamics by the closely related GTPases Cdc42 and TC10}, series = {Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience}, volume = {14}, journal = {Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience}, issn = {1663-3563}, doi = {10.3389/fnsyn.2022.959875}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-282816}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Interneuronal synaptic transmission relies on the proper spatial organization of presynaptic neurotransmitter release and its reception on the postsynaptic side by cognate neurotransmitter receptors. Neurotransmitter receptors are incorporated into and arranged within the plasma membrane with the assistance of scaffolding and adaptor proteins. At inhibitory GABAergic postsynapses, collybistin, a neuronal adaptor protein, recruits the scaffolding protein gephyrin and interacts with various neuronal factors including cell adhesion proteins of the neuroligin family, the GABAA receptor α2-subunit and the closely related small GTPases Cdc42 and TC10 (RhoQ). Most collybistin splice variants harbor an N-terminal SH3 domain and exist in an autoinhibited/closed state. Cdc42 and TC10, despite sharing 67.4\% amino acid sequence identity, interact differently with collybistin. Here, we delineate the molecular basis of the collybistin conformational activation induced by TC10 with the aid of recently developed collybistin FRET sensors. Time-resolved fluorescence-based FRET measurements reveal that TC10 binds to closed/inactive collybistin leading to relief of its autoinhibition, contrary to Cdc42, which only interacts with collybistin when forced into an open state by the introduction of mutations destabilizing the closed state of collybistin. Taken together, our data describe a TC10-driven signaling mechanism in which collybistin switches from its autoinhibited closed state to an open/active state.}, language = {en} }