@article{SantoroLabopinGiannottietal.2018,
  author    = {Santoro, Nicole and Labopin, Myriam and Giannotti, Federica and Ehninger, Gerard and Niederwieser, Dietger and Brecht, Arne and Stelljes, Matthias and Kr{\"o}ger, Nicolaus and Einsele, Herman and Eder, Matthias and Hallek, Michael and Glass, Bertram and Finke, J{\"u}rgen and Ciceri, Fabio and Mohty, Mohamad and Ruggeri, Annalisa and Nagler, Arnon},
  title     = {Unmanipulated haploidentical in comparison with matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in patients 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT},
  series = {Journal of Hematology \& Oncology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal of Hematology \& Oncology},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13045-018-0598-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227315},
  pages     = {55, 1-10},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is both more common and with more biologically aggressive phenotype in the elderly. Allogenic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the best treatment option in fit patients. Either HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) or haploidentical (Haplo) donor are possible alternative for patients in need. Methods: We retrospectively compared non-T-cell-depleted Haplo (n = 250) to 10/10 MUD (n = 2589) in AML patients >= 60 years. Results: Median follow-up was 23 months. Disease status at transplant differs significantly between the two groups (p < 10(-4)). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was administrated to 73 and 77\% of Haplo and MUD, respectively (p = 0.23). Stem cell source was the bone marrow (BM) in 52\% of the Haplo and 6\% of MUD (p < 10(-4)). Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was most frequently used in MUD (p < 10(-4)) while post-Tx cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was given in 62\% of Haplo. Engraftment was achieved in 90\% of the Haplo vs 97\% of MUD (p < 10(-4)). In multivariate analysis, no significant difference was found between Haplo and MUD for acute (a) graft versus host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV, relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia free survival (LFS), graft-versus-host-free-relapse free survival (GRFS), and overall survival (OS). Extensive chronic (c) GVHD was significantly higher for MUD as compared to Haplo (HR 2, p = 0.01, 95\% CI 1.17-3.47). A propensity score analysis confirmed the higher risk of extensive cGVHD for MUD without differences for other outcomes. Conclusions: Allo-SCT from both Haplo and MUD are valid option for AML patients >= 60 years of age with similar results. Transplantation from MUD was associated with higher extensive cGVHD. Our findings suggest that Haplo is a suitable and attractive graft source for patients >= 60 with AML in need of allo-SCT.},
  language  = {en}
}