@article{MunozCentifantiStickleThomasetal.2021,
  author    = {Mu{\~n}oz Centifanti, Luna C. and Stickle, Timothy R. and Thomas, Jamila and Falc{\´o}n, Amanda and Thomson, Nicholas D. and Gamer, Matthias},
  title     = {Reflexive Gaze Shifts and Fear Recognition Deficits in Children with Callous-Unemotional Traits and Impulsivity/Conduct Problems},
  series = {Brain Sciences},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Brain Sciences},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {2076-3425},
  doi       = {10.3390/brainsci11101342},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-248536},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The ability to efficiently recognize the emotions on others' faces is something that most of us take for granted. Children with callous-unemotional (CU) traits and impulsivity/conduct problems (ICP), such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, have been previously described as being "fear blind". This is also associated with looking less at the eye regions of fearful faces, which are highly diagnostic. Previous attempts to intervene into emotion recognition strategies have not had lasting effects on participants' fear recognition abilities. Here we present both (a) additional evidence that there is a two-part causal chain, from personality traits to face recognition strategies using the eyes, then from strategies to rates of recognizing fear in others; and (b) a pilot intervention that had persistent effects for weeks after the end of instruction. Further, the intervention led to more change in those with the highest CU traits. This both clarifies the specific mechanisms linking personality to emotion recognition and shows that the process is fundamentally malleable. It is possible that such training could promote empathy and reduce the rates of antisocial behavior in specific populations in the future.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KrishnaRiedMeixner2021,
  author    = {Krishna, Anand and Ried, Sophia and Meixner, Marie},
  title     = {State-trait interactions in regulatory focus determine impulse buying behavior},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0253634},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-261206},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Little research has focused on motivational state-trait interactions to explain impulse buying. Although the trait chronic regulatory focus has been linked to impulse buying, no evidence yet exists for an effect of situational regulatory focus and no research has examined whether the fit of chronic and situational regulatory focus can influence impulse buying with actual consumptive consequences rather than purchase intentions. Two laboratory experiments (total N = 250) manipulated situational regulatory focus before providing opportunities for impulse buying. In addition, cognitive constraint was manipulated as a potential boundary condition for regulatory focus effects. Situational promotion focus increased impulse buying relative to situational prevention focus in participants with strong chronic promotion, consistent with regulatory fit theory and independently of cognitive constraint. Surprisingly, situational promotion focus also increased impulse buying in participants with strong chronic prevention, but only under low cognitive constraint. These results may be explained by diverging mediating cognitive processes for promotion vs. prevention focus' effect on impulse buying. Future research must focus more on combining relevant states and traits in predicting consumer behavior. Marketing implications are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}