@article{SantoroLabopinGiannottietal.2018, author = {Santoro, Nicole and Labopin, Myriam and Giannotti, Federica and Ehninger, Gerard and Niederwieser, Dietger and Brecht, Arne and Stelljes, Matthias and Kr{\"o}ger, Nicolaus and Einsele, Herman and Eder, Matthias and Hallek, Michael and Glass, Bertram and Finke, J{\"u}rgen and Ciceri, Fabio and Mohty, Mohamad and Ruggeri, Annalisa and Nagler, Arnon}, title = {Unmanipulated haploidentical in comparison with matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in patients 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT}, series = {Journal of Hematology \& Oncology}, volume = {11}, journal = {Journal of Hematology \& Oncology}, doi = {10.1186/s13045-018-0598-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227315}, pages = {55, 1-10}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is both more common and with more biologically aggressive phenotype in the elderly. Allogenic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the best treatment option in fit patients. Either HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) or haploidentical (Haplo) donor are possible alternative for patients in need. Methods: We retrospectively compared non-T-cell-depleted Haplo (n = 250) to 10/10 MUD (n = 2589) in AML patients >= 60 years. Results: Median follow-up was 23 months. Disease status at transplant differs significantly between the two groups (p < 10(-4)). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was administrated to 73 and 77\% of Haplo and MUD, respectively (p = 0.23). Stem cell source was the bone marrow (BM) in 52\% of the Haplo and 6\% of MUD (p < 10(-4)). Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was most frequently used in MUD (p < 10(-4)) while post-Tx cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was given in 62\% of Haplo. Engraftment was achieved in 90\% of the Haplo vs 97\% of MUD (p < 10(-4)). In multivariate analysis, no significant difference was found between Haplo and MUD for acute (a) graft versus host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV, relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia free survival (LFS), graft-versus-host-free-relapse free survival (GRFS), and overall survival (OS). Extensive chronic (c) GVHD was significantly higher for MUD as compared to Haplo (HR 2, p = 0.01, 95\% CI 1.17-3.47). A propensity score analysis confirmed the higher risk of extensive cGVHD for MUD without differences for other outcomes. Conclusions: Allo-SCT from both Haplo and MUD are valid option for AML patients >= 60 years of age with similar results. Transplantation from MUD was associated with higher extensive cGVHD. Our findings suggest that Haplo is a suitable and attractive graft source for patients >= 60 with AML in need of allo-SCT.}, language = {en} } @article{NeuchelFuerstNiederwieseretal.2017, author = {Neuchel, Christine and F{\"u}rst, Daniel and Niederwieser, Dietger and Bunjes, Donald and Tsamadou, Chrysanthi and Wulf, Gerald and Pfreundschuh, Michael and Wagner, Eva and Stuhler, Gernot and Einsele, Hermann and Schrezenmeier, Hubert and Mytilineos, Joannis}, title = {Impact of donor activating KIR genes on HSCT outcome in C1-ligand negative myeloid disease patients transplanted with unrelated donors - a retrospective study}, series = {PLOS One}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLOS One}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0169512}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-180995}, pages = {39}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Natural Killer cells (NK) are lymphocytes with the potential to recognize and lyse cells which escaped T-cell mediated lysis due to their aberrant HLA expression profiles. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) influence NK-cell activity by mediation of activating or inhibitory signals upon interaction with HLA-C (C1, C2) ligands. Therefore, absence of ligands for donor inhibitory KIRs following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may have an influence on its outcome. Previous studies showed that C1 negative patients have a decreased HSCT outcome. Our study, based on a cohort of 200 C1-negative patients, confirmed these findings for the endpoints: overall survival (OS: HR = 1.41, CI = 1.14-1.74, p = 0.0012), disease free survival (DFS: HR = 1.27, CI = 1.05-1.53, p = 0.015), treatment related mortality (TRM: HR = 1.41, CI = 1.01-1.96, p = 0.04), and relapse incidence (RI: HR = 1.33, CI = 1.01-1.75, p = 0.04) all being inferior when compared to C1-positive patients (n = 1246). Subsequent analysis showed that these findings applied for patients with myeloid malignancies but not for patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (OS: myeloid: HR = 1.51, CI = 1.15-1.99, p = 0.003; lymphoblastic: HR = 1.26, CI = 0.91-1.75, p = 0.16; DFS: myeloid: HR = 1.31, CI = 1.01-1.70, p = 0.04; lymphoblastic: HR = 1.21, CI = 0.90-1.61, p = 0.21; RI: myeloid: HR = 1.31, CI = 1.01-1.70, p = 0.04; lymphoblastic: HR = 1.21, CI = 0.90-1.61, p = 0.21). Interestingly, within the C1-negative patient group, transplantation with KIR2DS2 resulted in better OS (9/10 matched: HR = 0.24, CI = 0.08-0.67, p = 0.007) as well as DFS (9/10 matched: HR = 0,26, CI = 0.11-0.60, p = 0.002), and transplantation with KIR2DS1 positive donors was associated with a decreased RI (HR = 0.30, CI = 0.13-0.69, p = 0.005). TRM was increased when the donor was positive for KIR2DS1 (HR = 2.61, CI = 1.26-5.41, p = 0.001). Our findings suggest that inclusion of KIR2DS1/2/5 and KIR3DS1-genotyping in the unrelated donor search algorithm of C1-ligand negative patients with myeloid malignancies may prove to be of clinical relevance.}, language = {en} }