@article{SperlichHahnEdeletal.2018, author = {Sperlich, Billy and Hahn, Lea-Sofie and Edel, Antonia and Behr, Tino and Helmprobst, Julian and Leppich, Robert and Wallmann-Sperlich, Birgit and Holmberg, Hans-Christer}, title = {A 4-week intervention involving mobile-based daily 6-minute micro-sessions of functional high-intensity circuit training improves strength and quality of life, but not cardio-respiratory fitness of young untrained adults}, series = {Frontiers in Physiology}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Physiology}, number = {423}, doi = {10.3389/fphys.2018.00423}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176565}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The present study was designed to assess the psycho-physiological responses of physically untrained individuals to mobile-based multi-stimulating, circuit-like, multiple-joint conditioning (Circuit\(_{HIIT}\)) performed either once (1xCircuitHIIT) or twice (2xCircuit\(_{HIIT}\)) daily for 4 weeks. In this single-center, two-arm randomized, controlled study, 24 men and women (age: 25 ± 5 years) first received no training instructions for 4 weeks and then performed 4 weeks of either 1xCircuitHIIT or 2xCircuit\(_{HIIT}\) (5 men and 7 women in each group) daily. The 1xCircuitHIIT and 2xCircuit\(_{HIIT}\) participants carried out 90.7 and 85.7\% of all planned training sessions, respectively, with average heart rates during the 6-min sessions of 74.3 and 70.8\% of maximal heart rate. Body, fat and fat-free mass, and metabolic rate at rest did not differ between the groups or between time-points of measurement. Heart rate while running at 6 km⋅h\(^{-1}\) declined after the intervention in both groups. Submaximal and peak oxygen uptake, the respiratory exchange ratio and heart rate recovery were not altered by either intervention. The maximal numbers of push-ups, leg-levers, burpees, 45°-one-legged squats and 30-s skipping, as well as perception of general health improved in both groups. Our 1xCircuit\(_{HIIT}\) or 2xCircuit\(_{HIIT}\) interventions improved certain parameters of functional strength and certain dimensions of quality of life in young untrained individuals. However, they were not sufficient to enhance cardio-respiratory fitness, in particular peak oxygen uptake.}, language = {en} } @article{SperlichWallmannSperlichZinneretal.2017, author = {Sperlich, Billy and Wallmann-Sperlich, Birgit and Zinner, Christoph and Von Stauffenberg, Valerie and Losert, Helena and Holmberg, Hans-Christer}, title = {Functional High-intensity Circuit Training Improves Body Composition,Peak Oxygen Uptake, Strength, and Alters Certain Dimensions of Quality of Life in Overweight Women}, series = {Frontiers in Physiology}, volume = {8}, journal = {Frontiers in Physiology}, number = {172}, doi = {10.3389/fphys.2017.00172}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-171015}, year = {2017}, abstract = {The effects of circuit-like functional high-intensity training (Circuit\(_{HIIT}\)) alone or in combination with high-volume low-intensity exercise (Circuit\(_{combined}\)) on selected cardio-respiratory and metabolic parameters, body composition, functional strength and the quality of life of overweight women were compared. In this single-center, two-armed randomized, controlled study, overweight women performed 9-weeks (3 sessions·wk\(^{-1}\)) of either Circuit\(_{HIIT}\) (n = 11), or Circuit\(_{combined}\) (n = 8). Peak oxygen uptake and perception of physical pain were increased to a greater extent (p < 0.05) by Circuit\(_{HIIT}\), whereas Circuit\(_{combined}\) improved perception of general health more (p < 0.05). Both interventions lowered body mass, body-mass-index, waist-to-hip ratio, fat mass, and enhanced fat-free mass; decreased ratings of perceived exertion during submaximal treadmill running; improved the numbers of push-ups, burpees, one-legged squats, and 30-s skipping performed, as well as the height of counter-movement jumps; and improved physical and social functioning, role of physical limitations, vitality, role of emotional limitations, and mental health to a similar extent (all p < 0.05). Either forms of these multi-stimulating, circuit-like, multiple-joint training can be employed to improve body composition, selected variables of functional strength, and certain dimensions of quality of life in overweight women. However, Circuit\(_{HIIT}\) improves peak oxygen uptake to a greater extent, but with more perception of pain, whereas Circuit\(_{Combined}\) results in better perception of general health.}, language = {en} }