@phdthesis{Mambretti2015,
  author    = {Mambretti, Egle Maria},
  title     = {Opioid receptors as therapeutic targets for nociceptor specific regional analgesia},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128866},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Opioids have been, since centuries, the gold standard for pain treatment and relief. They exert their effects after binding to opioid receptors (OP) that are expressed and functional in the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). As their systemic application has many side effects, including sedation and respiratory depression, a peripheral application of opioids and selective targeting of µ-OP (MOP) in nociceptive axons would be extremely beneficial. MOP presence and function has been conclusively demonstrated at nerve terminals; however it is still controversial whether functional MOPs are available on the membrane of peripheral nociceptive axons to mediate opioid-induced antinociception. While under pathologic conditions (i.e. nerve injury) exogenous as well as endogenous MOP agonists applied at the damaged nerve can elicit potent antinociception or anti-allodynia, under physiological conditions no antinociception was seen in rats. This could be caused by either a lack of functional opioid receptors in the axonal membranes or by the inability of injected opioids to cross the intact perineurial barrier and to reach nociceptors. Previous behavioral test results showed an antinociceptive effect (up to 5h) following perisciatic application of the hydrophilic DAMGO (MOP agonist) if coinjected with hypertonic saline solution (HTS; 10\% NaCl), a treatment suited to open the perineural barrier. The effect was inhibited by naloxone, a MOP antagonist, documenting its specific action via MOP. Fentanyl, a lipophilic opioid, elicited an effect, which was enhanced by HTS treatment, indicating that HTS may act not only on the barrier but also directly on axonal MOP presence and/or functionality. To provide a basis for testing this hypothesis, the present work was designed to study the axonal localization of MOP in experimental animals under different conditions using molecular and morphological methods. Initially four different commercial antibodies were tested for MOP detection. Immunoreactions with these antibodies specifically detected MOP in the hippocampus and in amygdala, while in the peripheral nervous system the reactions showed varying labeling patterns pointing towards less specificity with low signal-to-noise ratio. Double labelling with calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), a neuropeptide expressed in sensory fibers, with the non-compacted myelin marker S100 or with the neuronal marker PGP9.5 documented significant immunoreaction signals outside sensory nerve fibers. Therefore, none of these antibodies appeared suitable. Taking advantage of a new commercial monoclonal rabbit antibody (RabMAb) and of genetically modified mice in which the fluorescent protein mcherry was inserted in the C-tail of MOP (MOP-mcherry knock-in mice), MOP fusion protein expression in rat and mouse CGRP+ sciatic nerve fibers and fiber bundles was confirmed by immunofluorescence labeling. Immunoelectron microscopic analysis indicated MOP/MOP-mcherry-localization in the cytoplasm and the membranes of unmyelinated axons organized in Remak bundles. Both antibodies detected bands of appropriate size in Western Blot in the CNS and additional larger bands in the PNS. Quantitative analyses 60 min after HTS-treatment revealed no change in MOP mRNA in the sciatic nerve and DRG as well as no change in MOP immunoreactivity in the sciatic nerve. Thus, the opioid-induced long lasting antinociception enhanced by perisciatic injection of HTS were not due to a sustained increased MOP expression or content in sensory, putative nociceptive axons. In summary, the current study succeeded to unequivocally document the presence of MOP protein in intact sensory axons of rat and mouse sciatic nerve. Thus, axonal MOPs may indeed mediate antinociceptive opioid effects observed in behavioral studies in naive animals possibly via activation of potassium or calcium channels. As HTS treatment does not lead to a sustained increase in axonal MOP protein or MOP mRNA expression, other mechanisms might enhance MOP function, including inhibition of MOP recycling or changes in functional coupling. Future studies should further explore the axonal mechanisms of antinociception by opioids and enhancing treatments.},
  subject      = {Opioide},
  language  = {en}
}