@article{AertsEberleinHolmetal.2021,
  author    = {Aerts, An and Eberlein, Uta and Holm, S{\"o}ren and Hustinx, Roland and Konijnenberg, Mark and Strigari, Lidia and van Leeuwen, Fijs W. B. and Glatting, Gerhard and Lassmann, Michael},
  title     = {EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine},
  series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00259-021-05345-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265595},
  pages     = {3365-3377},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LapaSchrederSchirbeletal.2017,
  author    = {Lapa, Constantin and Schreder, Martin and Schirbel, Andreas and Samnick, Samuel and Kort{\"u}m, Klaus Martin and Herrmann, Ken and Kropf, Saskia and Einsele, Herrmann and Buck, Andreas K. and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Knop, Stefan and L{\"u}ckerath, Katharina},
  title     = {[\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in multiple myeloma - comparison to [\(^{18}\)F]FDG and laboratory values},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.16576},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-172106},
  pages     = {205-212},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) is a key factor for tumor growth and metastasis in several types of human cancer including multiple myeloma (MM). Proof-of-concept of CXCR4-directed radionuclide therapy in MM has recently been reported. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of the CXCR4-directed radiotracer [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor in MM and a potential role for stratifying patients to CXCR4-directed therapies. Thirty-five patients with MM underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for evaluation of eligibility for endoradiotherapy. In 19/35 cases, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG-PET/CT for correlation was available. Scans were compared on a patient and on a lesion basis. Tracer uptake was correlated with standard clinical parameters of disease activity. [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET detected CXCR4-positive disease in 23/35 subjects (66\%). CXCR4-positivity at PET was independent from myeloma subtypes, cytogenetics or any serological parameters and turned out as a negative prognostic factor. In the 19 patients in whom a comparison to [\(^{18}\)F]FDG was available, [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET detected more lesions in 4/19 (21\%) subjects, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG proved superior in 7/19 (37\%). In the remaining 8/19 (42\%) patients, both tracers detected an equal number of lesions. [\(^{18}\)F]FDG-PET positivity correlated with [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET positivity (p=0.018). [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET provides further evidence that CXCR4 expression frequently occurs in advanced multiple myeloma, representing a negative prognostic factor and a potential target for myeloma specific treatment. However, selecting patients for CXCR4 directed therapies and prognostic stratification seem to be more relevant clinical applications for this novel imaging modality, rather than diagnostic imaging of myeloma.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LapaKircherHaenscheidetal.2018,
  author    = {Lapa, Constantin and Kircher, Malte and H{\"a}nscheid, Heribert and Schirbel, Andreas and Grigoleit, G{\"o}tz Ulrich and Klinker, Erdwine and B{\"o}ck, Markus and Samnick, Samuel and Pelzer, Theo and Buck, Andreas K},
  title     = {Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a new tool in treatment-refractory sarcoidosis - initial experience in two patients},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.22161},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158983},
  pages     = {644-649},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology that can involve virtually all organ systems. Whereas most patients present without symptoms, progressive and disabling organ failure can occur in up to 10\% of subjects. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has recently received market authorization for treatment of SSTR-positive neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: We describe the first case series comprising two patients with refractory multi-organ involvement of sarcoidosis who received 4 cycles of PRRT. Results: PRRT was well-tolerated without any acute adverse effects. No relevant toxicities could be recorded during follow-up. Therapy resulted in partial response accompanied by a pronounced reduction in pain (patient \#1) and stable disease regarding morphology as well as disease activity (patient \#2), respectively. Conclusion: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in sarcoidosis is feasible and might be a new valuable tool in patients with otherwise treatment-refractory disease. Given the long experience with and good tolerability of PRRT, further evaluation of this new treatment option for otherwise treatment-refractory sarcoidosis in larger patient cohorts is warranted.},
  language  = {en}
}