@article{Menke2019,
  author    = {Menke, Andreas},
  title     = {Is the HPA axis as target for depression outdated, or is there a new hope?},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  number    = {101},
  issn      = {1664-0640},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00101},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195780},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a very common stress-related mental disorder that carries a huge burden for affected patients and the society. It is associated with a high mortality that derives from suicidality and the development of serious medical conditions such as heart diseases, diabetes, and stroke. Although a range of effective antidepressants are available, more than 50\% of the patients do not respond to the first treatment they are prescribed and around 30\% fail to respond even after several treatment attempts. The heterogeneous condition of MDD, the lack of biomarkers matching patients with the right treatments and the situation that almost all available drugs are only targeting the serotonin, norepinephrine, or dopamine signaling, without regulating other potentially dysregulated systems may explain the insufficient treatment status. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is one of these other systems, there is numerous and robust evidence that it is implicated in MDD and other stress-related conditions, but up to date there is no specific drug targeting HPA axis components that is approved and no test that is routinely used in the clinical setting identifying patients for such a specific treatment. Is there still hope after these many years for a breakthrough of agents targeting the HPA axis? This review will cover tests detecting altered HPA axis function and the specific treatment options such as glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists, corticotropin-releasing hormone 1 (CRH1) receptor antagonists, tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) inhibitors and FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) receptor antagonists.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LuleKueblerLudolph2019,
  author    = {Lul{\´e}, Doroth{\´e}e and K{\"u}bler, Andrea and Ludolph, Albert C.},
  title     = {Ethical principles in patient-centered medical care to support quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis},
  series = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  issn      = {1664-2295},
  doi       = {10.3389/fneur.2019.00259},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-196239},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {It is one of the primary goals of medical care to secure good quality of life (QoL) while prolonging survival. This is a major challenge in severe medical conditions with a prognosis such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Further, the definition of QoL and the question whether survival in this severe condition is compatible with a good QoL is a matter of subjective and culture-specific debate. Some people without neurodegenerative conditions believe that physical decline is incompatible with satisfactory QoL. Current data provide extensive evidence that psychosocial adaptation in ALS is possible, indicated by a satisfactory QoL. Thus, there is no fatalistic link of loss of QoL when physical health declines. There are intrinsic and extrinsic factors that have been shown to successfully facilitate and secure QoL in ALS which will be reviewed in the following article following the four ethical principles (1) Beneficence, (2) Non-maleficence, (3) Autonomy and (4) Justice, which are regarded as key elements of patient centered medical care according to Beauchamp and Childress. This is a JPND-funded work to summarize findings of the project NEEDSinALS (www.NEEDSinALS.com) which highlights subjective perspectives and preferences in medical decision making in ALS.},
  language  = {en}
}