@article{WirtzGraviusAscherletal.2014, author = {Wirtz, Dieter C. and Gravius, Sascha and Ascherl, Rudolf and Thorweihe, Miguel and Forst, Raimund and Noeth, Ulrich and Maus, Uwe M. and Wimmer, Matthias D. and Zeiler, Guenther and Deml, Moritz C.}, title = {Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem 5-to 16-year results of 163 cases}, series = {Acta Orthopaedica}, volume = {85}, journal = {Acta Orthopaedica}, number = {6}, issn = {1745-3674}, doi = {10.3109/17453674.2014.958809}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-114555}, pages = {562 - 569}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background and purpose - Due to the relative lack of reports on the medium- to long-term clinical and radiographic results of modular femoral cementless revision, we conducted this study to evaluate the medium- to long-term results of uncemented femoral stem revisions using the modular MRP-TITAN stem with distal diaphyseal fixation in a consecutive patient series. Patients and methods - We retrospectively analyzed 163 femoral stem revisions performed between 1993 and 2001 with a mean follow-up of 10 (5-16) years. Clinical assessment included the Harris hip score (HHS) with reference to comorbidities and femoral defect sizes classified by Charnley and Paprosky. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed and the failure rate of the MRP stem for any reason was examined. Results - Mean HHS improved up to the last follow-up (37 (SD 24) vs. 79 (SD 19); p < 0.001). 99 cases (61\%) had extensive bone defects (Paprosky IIB-III). Radiographic evaluation showed stable stem anchorage in 151 cases (93\%) at the last follow-up. 10 implants (6\%) failed for various reasons. Neither a breakage of a stem nor loosening of the morse taper junction was recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a 10-year survival probability of 97\% (95\% CI: 95-100). Interpretation - This is one of the largest medium- to longterm analyses of cementless modular revision stems with distal diaphyseal anchorage. The modular MRP-TITAN was reliable, with a Kaplan-Meier survival probability of 97\% at 10 years.}, language = {en} } @article{SherifInceManiucetal.2015, author = {Sherif, Mohammad A. and Ince, H{\"u}seyin and Maniuc, Octavian and Reiter, Therese and Voelker, Wolfram and Ertl, Georg and {\"O}ner, Alper}, title = {Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annular sizing in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation}, series = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders}, volume = {15}, journal = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders}, number = {181}, doi = {10.1186/s12872-015-0181-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-136002}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background: Accurate preoperative assessment of the aortic annulus dimension is crucial for successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In this study we examined the accuracy of a novel method using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE) for measurement of the aortic annulus. Methods: We evaluated the theoretical impact of the measurement of the annulus diameter and area using the circumcircle of a triangle method on the decision to perform the procedure and choice of the prosthesis size. Results: Sixty-three consecutive patients were scheduled for TAVI. Mean age was 82 +/- 4 years, and 25 patients (55.6 \%) were female. Mean aortic annulus diameter was 20.3 +/- 2.2 mm assessed by TEE on the mid-esophageal long-axis view and 23.9 +/- 2.3 mm using CT (p < 0.001). There was a tendency for the TEE derived areas using the new method to be higher (p < 0.001). The TEE measurements were on average 42.33 mm(2) higher than the CT measurements without an evidence of a systematic over-or under-sizing (p = 1.00). Agreement between TEE and CT chosen valve sizes was good overall (kappa = 0.67 and weighted kappa = 0.71). For patients who turned out to have no AR, the two methods agreed in 84.6 \% of patients. Conclusions: CT remanis the gold standard in sizing of the aortic valve annulus. Nevertheless, sizing of the aortic valve annulus using TEE derived area may be helpful. The impact of integration of this method in the algorithm of aortic annulus sizing on the outcome of patients undergoing TAVI should be examined in future studies.}, language = {en} } @article{WimmerRandauDemletal.2013, author = {Wimmer, Matthias D. and Randau, Thomas M. and Deml, Moritz C. and Ascherl, Rudolf and Forst, Raimund and Gravius, Nadine and Wirtz, Dieter and Gravius, Sascha}, title = {Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant}, series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}, volume = {14}, journal = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}, number = {19}, issn = {1471-2474}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2474-14-19}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122061}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background: We present a descriptive and retrospective analysis of revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) using the MRP-TITAN stem (Peter Brehm, Weisendorf, GER) with distal diaphyseal fixation and metaphyseal defect augmentation. Our hypothesis was that the metaphyseal defect augmentation (Impaction Bone Grafting) improves the stem survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the aggregated and anonymized data of 243 femoral stem revisions. 68 patients with 70 implants (28.8\%) received an allograft augmentation for metaphyseal defects; 165 patients with 173 implants (71.2\%) did not, and served as controls. The mean follow-up was 4.4 +/- 1.8 years (range, 2.1-9.6 years). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the study and control group regarding age, body mass index (BMI), femoral defects (types I-III as described by Paprosky), and preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS). Postoperative clinical function was evaluated using the HHS. Postoperative radiologic examination evaluated implant stability, axial implant migration, signs of implant loosening, periprosthetic radiolucencies, as well as bone regeneration and resorption. Results: There were comparable rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications in the study and control groups (p > 0.05). Clinical function, expressed as the increase in the postoperative HHS over the preoperative score, showed significantly greater improvement in the group with Impaction Bone Grafting (35.6 +/- 14.3 vs. 30.8 +/- 15.8; p <= 0.05). The study group showed better outcome especially for larger defects (types II C and III as described by Paprosky) and stem diameters >= 17 mm. The two groups did not show significant differences in the rate of aseptic loosening (1.4\% vs. 2.9\%) and the rate of revisions (8.6\% vs. 11\%). The Kaplan-Meier survival for the MRP-TITAN stem in both groups together was 93.8\% after 8.8 years. [Study group 95.7\% after 8.54 years; control group 93.1\% after 8.7 years]. Radiologic evaluation showed no significant change in axial implant migration (4.3\% vs. 9.3\%; p = 0.19) but a significant reduction in proximal stress shielding (5.7\% vs. 17.9\%; p < 0.05) in the study group. Periprosthetic radiolucencies were detected in 5.7\% of the study group and in 9.8\% of the control group (p = 0.30). Radiolucencies in the proximal zones 1 and 7 according to Gruen occurred significantly more often in the control group without allograft augmentation (p = 0.05). Conclusion: We present the largest analysis of the impaction grafting technique in combination with cementless distal diaphyseal stem fixation published so far. Our data provides initial evidence of improved bone regeneration after graft augmentation of metaphyseal bone defects. The data suggests that proximal metaphyseal graft augmentation is beneficial for large metaphyseal bone defects (Paprosky types IIC and III) and stem diameters of 17 mm and above. Due to the limitations of a retrospective and descriptive study the level of evidence remains low and prospective trials should be conducted.}, language = {en} } @article{SherifHeroldVoelkeretal.2015, author = {Sherif, Mohammad A. and Herold, Joerg and Voelker, Wolfram and Maniuc, Octavian and Ertl, Georg and Praast, Christian and Braun-Dullaeus, Ruediger Christian}, title = {Feasibility of a new method using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annular sizing in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation; a case-control study}, series = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders}, volume = {15}, journal = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders}, number = {78}, doi = {10.1186/s12872-015-0072-7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-148328}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background: Accurate preoperative assessment of the aortic annulus dimension is crucial for successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In this study we validated a new method using two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE) for measurement of the aortic annulus prior to TAVI. Methods: We analysed 124 patients who underwent successful TAVI using a self-expandable prosthesis, divided equally into two groups; in the study group we used the cross sectional short axis 2D-TEE for measurement of the aortic annulus and in the control group we used the long axis 2D-TEE. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding the clinical parameters. On the other hand, patients in the study group had less left ventricular ejection fraction (38.9 \% versus 45.6 \%, p = 0.01). The aortic valve annulus was, although not statistically significant, smaller in the study group (21.58 versus 23.28 mm, p = 0.25). Post procedural quantification of the aortic regurgitation revealed that only one patient in both groups had severe aortic regurgitation (AR), in this patient the valve was implanted deep. The incidence of significant AR was higher in the control group (29.0 \% versus 12.9 \%, p = 0.027). Conclusions: Sizing of the aortic valve annulus using cross-sectional 2D-TEE offers a safe and plausible method for patients undergoing TAVI using the self-expandable prosthesis and is significantly superior to using long axis 2D-TEE.}, language = {en} }