@article{BaurBuentemeyerMegerleetal.2017, author = {Baur, Johannes and B{\"u}ntemeyer, Tjark-Ole and Megerle, Felix and Deutschbein, Timo and Spitzweg, Christine and Quinkler, Marcus and Nawroth, Peter and Kroiss, Matthias and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Fassnacht, Martin and Steger, Ulrich}, title = {Outcome after resection of Adrenocortical Carcinoma liver metastases: a retrospective study}, series = {BMC Cancer}, volume = {17}, journal = {BMC Cancer}, number = {522}, doi = {10.1186/s12885-017-3506-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-159409}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background: Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor 5-year-survival rate (<15\%). A surgical approach is recommended in selected patients if complete resection of distant metastasis can be achieved. To date there are only limited data on the outcome after surgical resection of hepatic metastases of ACC. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the German Adrenocortical Carcinoma Registry was conducted. Patients with liver metastases of ACC but without extrahepatic metastases or incomplete tumour resection were included. Results: Seventy-seven patients fulfilled these criteria. Forty-three patients underwent resection of liver metastases of ACC. Complete tumour resection (R0) could be achieved in 30 (69.8\%). Median overall survival after liver resection was 76.1 months in comparison to 10.1 months in the 34 remaining patients with unresected liver metastases (p < 0.001). However, disease free survival after liver resection was only 9.1 months. Neither resection status (R0/R1) nor extent of liver resection were significant predictive factors for overall survival. Patients with a time interval to the first metastasis/recurrence (TTFR) of greater than 12 months or solitary liver metastases showed significantly prolonged survival. Conclusions: Liver resection in the case of ACC liver metastases can achieve long term survival with a median overall survival of more than 5 years, but disease free survival is short despite metastasectomy. Time to recurrence and single versus multiple metastases are predictive factors for the outcome.}, language = {en} } @article{WiegeringRiegelWagneretal.2017, author = {Wiegering, Armin and Riegel, Johannes and Wagner, Johanna and Kunzmann, Volker and Baur, Johannes and Walles, Thorsten and Dietz, Ulrich and Loeb, Stefan and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Steger, Ulrich and Klein, Ingo}, title = {The impact of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected colorectal cancer liver metastases}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0173933}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158036}, pages = {e0173933}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background 40-50\% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of the disease. One third of these patients will additionally develop pulmonary metastases. Methods 137 consecutive patients with CRLM, were analyzed regarding survival data, clinical, histological data and treatment. Results were stratified according to the occurrence of pulmonary metastases and metastases resection. Results 39\% of all patients with liver resection due to CRLM developed additional lung metastases. 44\% of these patients underwent subsequent pulmonary resection. Patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy showed a significantly better five-year survival compared to patients not qualified for curative resection (5-year survival 71.2\% vs. 28.0\%; p = 0.001). Interestingly, the 5-year survival of these patients was even superior to all patients with CRLM, who did not develop pulmonary metastases (77.5\% vs. 63.5\%; p = 0.015). Patients, whose pulmonary metastases were not resected, were more likely to redevelop liver metastases (50.0\% vs 78.6\%; p = 0.034). However, the rate of distant metastases did not differ between both groups (54.5 vs.53.6; p = 0.945). Conclusion The occurrence of colorectal lung metastases after curative liver resection does not impact patient survival if pulmonary metastasectomy is feasible. Those patients clearly benefit from repeated resections of the liver and the lung metastases.}, language = {en} } @article{BaurMatheGesierichetal.2017, author = {Baur, Johannes and Mathe, Katrin and Gesierich, Anja and Weyandt, Gerhard and Wiegering, Armin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Gasser, Martin and Pelz, J{\"o}rg O. W.}, title = {Morbidity and oncologic outcome after saphenous vein-sparing inguinal lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients}, series = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology}, volume = {15}, journal = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology}, number = {99}, doi = {10.1186/s12957-017-1164-x}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-157687}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) is a surgical procedure with a high morbidity rate. Variations in surgical procedure, such as sparing of the saphenous vein, have been proposed to reduce surgical morbidity. While sparing of the saphenous vein has shown promising results in earlier studies, data for this procedure in melanoma patients are rare. In this retrospective study, we report 10-year findings on the effects of saphenous vein-sparing LND on surgical morbidity and oncologic outcomes in melanoma patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of melanoma patients receiving inguinal LND in our facility between 2003 and 2013 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: the saphenous vein resection group and the vein sparing group. Surgical morbidity, including wound infection, lymphatic fistula, severe bleeding, neurological complications, and chronic lymphedema, as well as regional recurrence-free survival were investigated. Results: A total of 106 patients were included in this study; of these, the saphenous vein was spared in 41 patients (38.7\%). The rate of lymphatic fistula was 51.6 vs. 48.8\%, wound infection occurred in 31.3 vs. 24.4\%, and patients suffered from chronic lymphedema in 30.0 vs. 26.5\% in V. saphena magna resection vs. sparing group. Differences observed, however, were not significant. No difference in regional recurrence-free survival between the two study groups was detected. Conclusions: The results of our retrospective analysis could not confirm the promising results reported in earlier studies. Thus, sparing of the saphenous vein appears to be optional.}, language = {en} }