@article{FrickeAvilaKelleretal.2020,
  author    = {Fricke, Julia and {\´A}vila, Gabriela and Keller, Theresa and Weller, Karsten and Lau, Susanne and Maurer, Marcus and Zuberbier, Torsten and Keil, Thomas},
  title     = {Prevalence of chronic urticaria in children and adults across the globe: Systematic review with meta-analysis},
  series = {Allergy},
  volume    = {75},
  journal   = {Allergy},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1111/all.14037},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213700},
  pages     = {423 -- 432},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background and objectives: Urticaria is a frequent skin condition, but reliable prevalence estimates from population studies particularly of the chronic form are scarce. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate and summarize the prevalence of chronic urticaria by evaluating population-based studies worldwide. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PUBMED and EMBASE for population-based studies of cross-sectional or cohort design and studies based on health insurance/system databases. Risk of bias was assessed using a specific tool for prevalence studies. For meta-analysis, we used a random effects model. Results: Eighteen studies were included in the systematic evaluation and 11 in the meta-analysis including data from over 86 000 000 participants. Risk of bias was mainly moderate, whereas the statistical heterogeneity (I\(^{2}\)) between the studies was high. Asian studies combined showed a higher point prevalence of chronic urticaria (1.4\%, 95\%-CI 0.5-2.9) than those from Europe (0.5\%, 0.2-1.0) and Northern American (0.1\%, 0.1-0.1). Women were slightly more affected than men, whereas in children < 15 years we did not find a sex-specific difference in the prevalence. The four studies that examined time trends indicated an increasing prevalence of chronic urticaria over time. Conclusions: On a global level, the prevalence of chronic urticaria showed considerable regional differences. There is a need to obtain more sex-specific population-based and standardized international data particularly for children and adolescents, different chronic urticaria subtypes and potential risk and protective factors.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HessMengSchulteetal.2020,
  author    = {Heß, Verena and Meng, Karin and Schulte, Thomas and Neuderth, Silke and Bengel, J{\"u}rgen and Faller, Hermann and Schuler, Michael},
  title     = {Prevalence and predictors of cancer patients' unexpressed needs in the admission interview of inpatient rehabilitation},
  series = {Psycho-Oncology},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Psycho-Oncology},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1002/pon.5450},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228369},
  pages     = {1549 -- 1556},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Objective The admission interview in oncological inpatient rehabilitation might be a good opportunity to identify cancer patients' needs present after acute treatment. However, a relevant number of patients may not express their needs. In this study, we examined (a) the proportion of cancer patients with unexpressed needs, (b) topics of unexpressed needs and reasons for not expressing needs, (c) correlations of not expressing needs with several patient characteristics, and (d) predictors of not expressing needs. Methods We enrolled 449 patients with breast, prostate, and colon cancer at beginning and end of inpatient rehabilitation. We obtained self-reports about unexpressed needs and health-related variables (quality of life, depression, anxiety, adjustment disorder, and health literacy). We estimated frequencies and conducted correlation and ordinal logistic regression analyses. Results A quarter of patients stated they had "rather not" or "not at all" expressed all relevant needs. Patients mostly omitted fear of cancer recurrence. Most frequent reasons for not expressing needs were being focused on physical consequences of cancer, concerns emerging only later, and not knowing about the possibility of talking about distress. Not expressing needs was associated with several health-related outcomes, for example, emotional functioning, adjustment disorder, fear of progression, and health literacy. Depression measured at the beginning of rehabilitation showed only small correlations and is therefore not sufficient to identify patients with unexpressed needs. Conclusions A relevant proportion of cancer patients reported unexpressed needs in the admission interview. This was associated with decreased mental health. Therefore, it seems necessary to support patients in expressing needs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GrabenhenrichTrendelenburgBellachetal.2020,
  author    = {Grabenhenrich, Linus and Trendelenburg, Val{\´e}rie and Bellach, Johanna and Y{\"u}rek, Song{\"u}l and Reich, Andreas and Fiandor, Ana and Rivero, Daniela and Sigurdardottir, Sigurveig and Clausen, Michael and Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G. and Xepapadaki, Paraskevi and Sprikkelman, Aline B. and Dontje, Bianca and Roberts, Graham and Grimshaw, Kate and Kowalski, Marek L. and Kurowski, Marcin and Dubakiene, Ruta and Rudzeviciene, Odilija and Fern{\´a}ndez-Rivas, Montserrat and Couch, Philip and Versteeg, Serge A. and van Ree, Ronald and Mills, Clare and Keil, Thomas and Beyer, Kirsten},
  title     = {Frequency of food allergy in school-aged children in eight European countries—The EuroPrevall-iFAAM birth cohort},
  series = {Allergy},
  volume    = {75},
  journal   = {Allergy},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1111/all.14290},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214746},
  pages     = {2294 -- 2308},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background The prevalence of food allergy (FA) among European school children is poorly defined. Estimates have commonly been based on parent-reported symptoms. We aimed to estimate the frequency of FA and sensitization against food allergens in primary school children in eight European countries. Methods A follow-up assessment at age 6-10 years of a multicentre European birth cohort based was undertaken using an online parental questionnaire, clinical visits including structured interviews and skin prick tests (SPT). Children with suspected FA were scheduled for double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges (DBPCFC). Results A total of 6105 children participated in this school-age follow-up (57.8\% of 10 563 recruited at birth). For 982 of 6069 children (16.2\%), parents reported adverse reactions after food consumption in the online questionnaire. Of 2288 children with parental face-to-face interviews and/or skin prick testing, 238 (10.4\%) were eligible for a DBPCFC. Sixty-three foods were challenge-tested in 46 children. Twenty food challenges were positive in 17 children, including seven to hazelnut and three to peanut. Another seventy-one children were estimated to suffer FA among those who were eligible but refused DBPCFC. This yielded prevalence estimates for FA in school age between 1.4\% (88 related to all 6105 participants of this follow-up) and 3.8\% (88 related to 2289 with completed eligibility assessment). Interpretation In primary school children in eight European countries, the prevalence of FA was lower than expected even though parents of this cohort have become especially aware of allergic reactions to food. There was moderate variation between centres hampering valid regional comparisons.},
  language  = {en}
}