@article{ZamoGerhardHartmannOttetal.2022,
  author    = {Zam{\`o}, Alberto and Gerhard-Hartmann, Elena and Ott, German and Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis and Scott, David W. and Rosenwald, Andreas and Rauert-Wunderlich, Hilka},
  title     = {Routine application of the Lymph2Cx assay for the subclassification of aggressive B-cell lymphoma: report of a prospective real-world series},
  series = {Virchows Archiv},
  volume    = {481},
  journal   = {Virchows Archiv},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00428-022-03420-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324686},
  pages     = {935-943},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The subclassification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) into germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtypes has become mandatory in the 2017 update of the WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and will continue to be used in the WHO 5\(^{th}\) edition. The RNA-based Lymph2Cx assay has been validated as a reliable surrogate of high-throughput gene expression profiling assays for distinguishing between GCB and ABC DLBCL and provides reliable results from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material. This test has been previously used in clinical trials, but experience from real-world routine application is rare. We routinely applied the Lymph2Cx assay to day-to-day diagnostics on a series of 147 aggressive B-cell lymphoma cases and correlated our results with the immunohistochemical subclassification using the Hans algorithm and fluorescence in situ hybridization findings using break-apart probes for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6. The routine use of the Lymph2Cx assay had a high technical success rate (94.6\%) with a low rate of failure due to poor material and/or RNA quality. The Lymph2Cx assay was discordant with the Hans algorithm in 18\% (23 of 128 cases). Discordant cases were mainly classified as GCB by the Hans algorithm and as ABC by Lymph2Cx (n = 11, 8.6\%). Only 5 cases (3.9\%) were classified as non-GCB by the Hans algorithm and as GCB by Lymph2Cx. Additionally, 5.5\% of cases (n = 7) were left unclassified by Lymph2Cx, whereas they were defined as GCB (n = 4) or non-GCB (n = 3) by the Hans algorithm. Our data support the routine applicability of the Lymph2Cx assay.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZhouWuchterEgereretal.2019,
  author    = {Zhou, Xiang and Wuchter, Patrick and Egerer, Gerlinde and Kriegsmann, Mark and Mataityte, Aiste and Koelsche, Christian and Witzens-Harig, Mathias and Kriegsmann, Katharina},
  title     = {Role of virological serum markers in patients with both hepatitis B virus infection and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma},
  series = {European Journal of Haematology},
  volume    = {103},
  journal   = {European Journal of Haematology},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1111/ejh.13300},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258442},
  pages     = {410-416},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background Causality between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was reported in various studies. However, the implication of different virological serum markers of HBV infection in patients with both HBV infection and DLBCL is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of HBV markers on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with both HBV infection and DLBCL. Methods In this study, patients (n = 40) diagnosed with both HBV infection and DLBCL were identified between 2000 and 2017. Six patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection were excluded from this study. We retrospectively analyzed patients' demographic characteristics, treatment, and the prognostic impact of different HBV markers at first diagnosis of DLBCL (HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, anti-HBe, and HBV-DNA) on OS and PFS. Results The majority of patients (n = 21, 62\%) had advanced disease stage (III/IV) at diagnosis. In the first-line therapy, 24 patients (70\%) were treated with R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone). HBeAg positive patients had a trend toward inferior OS and PFS compared with HBeAg negative patients. Anti-HBe positive patients had a statistically significant better OS and PFS compared with anti-HBe negative group (both P < .0001). Viremia with HBV-DNA ≥ 2 × 107 IU/L had a significant negative impact on OS and PFS (both P < .0001). Conclusion High activity of viral replication is associated with a poor survival outcome of patients with both HBV infection and DLBCL.},
  language  = {en}
}