@phdthesis{Kortmann2022,
  author    = {Kortmann, Mareike},
  title     = {Biodiversity and recreation - Optimizing tourism and forest management in forests affected by bark beetles},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-24031},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-240317},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Forests are multi-functional system, which have to fulfil different objectives at the same time. The main functions include the production of wood, storage of carbon, the promotion of biological diversity and the provision of recreational space. Yet, global forests are affected by large and intense natural disturbances, like bark beetle infestations. While natural disturbances threaten wood production and are perceived as 'catastrophe' diminishing recreational value, biodiversity can benefit from the disturbance-induced changes in forest structures. This trade-off poses a dilemma to managers of bark beetle affected stands, particularly in protected areas designated to both nature conservation and recreation. Forest landscapes need a sustainable management concept aligning these different objectives. In order to support this goal with scientific knowledge, the aim of this work is to analyse ecological and social effects along a gradient of different disturbance severities. In this context, I studied the effects of a disturbance severity gradient on the diversity of different taxonomic groups including vascular plants, mosses, lichens, fungi, arthropods and birds in five national parks in Central Europe. To analyse the recreational value of the landscape I conducted visitor surveys in the same study areas in which the biodiversity surveys were performed. To analyse possible psychological or demographic effects on preferences for certain disturbance intensities, an additional online survey was carried out.},
  subject      = {Borkenk{\"a}fer},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KortmannRothBuseetal.2022,
  author    = {Kortmann, Mareike and Roth, Nicolas and Buse, J{\"o}rn and Hilszczański, Jacek and Jaworski, Tomasz and Morini{\`e}re, J{\´e}r{\^o}me and Seidl, Rupert and Thorn, Simon and M{\"u}ller, J{\"o}rg C.},
  title     = {Arthropod dark taxa provide new insights into diversity responses to bark beetle infestations},
  series = {Ecological Applications},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Ecological Applications},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1002/eap.2516},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276392},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Natural disturbances are increasing around the globe, also impacting protected areas. Although previous studies have indicated that natural disturbances result in mainly positive effects on biodiversity, these analyses mostly focused on a few well established taxonomic groups, and thus uncertainty remains regarding the comprehensive impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity. Using Malaise traps and meta-barcoding, we studied a broad range of arthropod taxa, including dark and cryptic taxa, along a gradient of bark beetle disturbance severities in five European national parks. We identified order-level community thresholds of disturbance severity and classified barcode index numbers (BINs; a cluster system for DNA sequences, where each cluster corresponds to a species) as negative or positive disturbance indicators. Negative indicator BINs decreased above thresholds of low to medium disturbance severity (20\%-30\% of trees killed), whereas positive indicator BINs benefited from high disturbance severity (76\%-98\%). BINs allocated to a species name contained nearly as many positive as negative disturbance indicators, but dark and cryptic taxa, particularly Diptera and Hymenoptera in our data, contained higher numbers of negative disturbance indicator BINs. Analyses of changes in the richness of BINs showed variable responses of arthropods to disturbance severity at lower taxonomic levels, whereas no significant signal was detected at the order level due to the compensatory responses of the underlying taxa. We conclude that the analyses of dark taxa can offer new insights into biodiversity responses to disturbances. Our results suggest considerable potential for forest management to foster arthropod diversity, for example by maintaining both closed-canopy forests (>70\% cover) and open forests (<30\% cover) on the landscape.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ViljurAbellaAdameketal.2022,
  author    = {Viljur, Mari-Liis and Abella, Scott R. and Ad{\´a}mek, Martin and Alencar, Janderson Batista Rodrigues and Barber, Nicholas A. and Beudert, Burkhard and Burkle, Laura A. and Cagnolo, Luciano and Campos, Brent R. and Chao, Anne and Chergui, Brahim and Choi, Chang-Yong and Cleary, Daniel F. R. and Davis, Thomas Seth and Dechnik-V{\´a}zquez, Yanus A. and Downing, William M. and Fuentes-Ramirez, Andr{\´e}s and Gandhi, Kamal J. K. and Gehring, Catherine and Georgiev, Kostadin B. and Gimbutas, Mark and Gongalsky, Konstantin B. and Gorbunova, Anastasiya Y. and Greenberg, Cathryn H. and Hylander, Kristoffer and Jules, Erik S. and Korobushkin, Daniil I. and K{\"o}ster, Kajar and Kurth, Valerie and Lanham, Joseph Drew and Lazarina, Maria and Leverkus, Alexandro B. and Lindenmayer, David and Marra, Daniel Magnabosco and Mart{\´i}n-Pinto, Pablo and Meave, Jorge A. and Moretti, Marco and Nam, Hyun-Young and Obrist, Martin K. and Petanidou, Theodora and Pons, Pere and Potts, Simon G. and Rapoport, Irina B. and Rhoades, Paul R. and Richter, Clark and Saifutdinov, Ruslan A. and Sanders, Nathan J. and Santos, Xavier and Steel, Zachary and Tavella, Julia and Wendenburg, Clara and Wermelinger, Beat and Zaitsev, Andrey S. and Thorn, Simon},
  title     = {The effect of natural disturbances on forest biodiversity: an ecological synthesis},
  series = {Biological Reviews},
  volume    = {97},
  journal   = {Biological Reviews},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1111/brv.12876},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-287168},
  pages     = {1930 -- 1947},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Disturbances alter biodiversity via their specific characteristics, including severity and extent in the landscape, which act at different temporal and spatial scales. Biodiversity response to disturbance also depends on the community characteristics and habitat requirements of species. Untangling the mechanistic interplay of these factors has guided disturbance ecology for decades, generating mixed scientific evidence of biodiversity responses to disturbance. Understanding the impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity is increasingly important due to human-induced changes in natural disturbance regimes. In many areas, major natural forest disturbances, such as wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks, are becoming more frequent, intense, severe, and widespread due to climate change and land-use change. Conversely, the suppression of natural disturbances threatens disturbance-dependent biota. Using a meta-analytic approach, we analysed a global data set (with most sampling concentrated in temperate and boreal secondary forests) of species assemblages of 26 taxonomic groups, including plants, animals, and fungi collected from forests affected by wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks. The overall effect of natural disturbances on α-diversity did not differ significantly from zero, but some taxonomic groups responded positively to disturbance, while others tended to respond negatively. Disturbance was beneficial for taxonomic groups preferring conditions associated with open canopies (e.g. hymenopterans and hoverflies), whereas ground-dwelling groups and/or groups typically associated with shady conditions (e.g. epigeic lichens and mycorrhizal fungi) were more likely to be negatively impacted by disturbance. Across all taxonomic groups, the highest α-diversity in disturbed forest patches occurred under moderate disturbance severity, i.e. with approximately 55\% of trees killed by disturbance. We further extended our meta-analysis by applying a unified diversity concept based on Hill numbers to estimate α-diversity changes in different taxonomic groups across a gradient of disturbance severity measured at the stand scale and incorporating other disturbance features. We found that disturbance severity negatively affected diversity for Hill number q = 0 but not for q = 1 and q = 2, indicating that diversity-disturbance relationships are shaped by species relative abundances. Our synthesis of α-diversity was extended by a synthesis of disturbance-induced change in species assemblages, and revealed that disturbance changes the β-diversity of multiple taxonomic groups, including some groups that were not affected at the α-diversity level (birds and woody plants). Finally, we used mixed rarefaction/extrapolation to estimate biodiversity change as a function of the proportion of forests that were disturbed, i.e. the disturbance extent measured at the landscape scale. The comparison of intact and naturally disturbed forests revealed that both types of forests provide habitat for unique species assemblages, whereas species diversity in the mixture of disturbed and undisturbed forests peaked at intermediate values of disturbance extent in the simulated landscape. Hence, the relationship between α-diversity and disturbance severity in disturbed forest stands was strikingly similar to the relationship between species richness and disturbance extent in a landscape consisting of both disturbed and undisturbed forest habitats. This result suggests that both moderate disturbance severity and moderate disturbance extent support the highest levels of biodiversity in contemporary forest landscapes.},
  language  = {en}
}