@article{FeldheimKesslerMonoranuetal.2019,
  author    = {Feldheim, Jonas and Kessler, Almuth F. and Monoranu, Camelia M. and Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo and L{\"o}hr, Mario and Hagemann, Carsten},
  title     = {Changes of O\(^6\)-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in glioblastoma relapse—a meta-analysis type literature review},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11121837},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-193040},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Methylation of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter has emerged as strong prognostic factor in the therapy of glioblastoma multiforme. It is associated with an improved response to chemotherapy with temozolomide and longer overall survival. MGMT promoter methylation has implications for the clinical course of patients. In recent years, there have been observations of patients changing their MGMT promoter methylation from primary tumor to relapse. Still, data on this topic are scarce. Studies often consist of only few patients and provide rather contrasting results, making it hard to draw a clear conclusion on clinical implications. Here, we summarize the previous publications on this topic, add new cases of changing MGMT status in relapse and finally combine all reports of more than ten patients in a statistical analysis based on the Wilson score interval. MGMT promoter methylation changes are seen in 115 of 476 analyzed patients (24\%; CI: 0.21-0.28). We discuss potential reasons like technical issues, intratumoral heterogeneity and selective pressure of therapy. The clinical implications are still ambiguous and do not yet support a change in clinical practice. However, retesting MGMT methylation might be useful for future treatment decisions and we encourage clinical studies to address this topic},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HartmannPluetschowMottoketal.2019,
  author    = {Hartmann, Sylvia and Pl{\"u}tschow, Annette and Mottok, Anja and Bernd, Heinz-Wolfram and Feller, Alfred C. and Ott, German and Cogliatti, Sergio and Fend, Falko and Quintanilla-Martinez, Leticia and Stein, Harald and Klapper, Wolfram and M{\"o}ller, Peter and Rosenwald, Andreas and Engert, Andreas and Hansmann, Martin-Leo and Eichenauer, Dennis A.},
  title     = {The time to relapse correlates with the histopathological growth pattern in nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma},
  series = {American Journal of Hematology},
  volume    = {94},
  journal   = {American Journal of Hematology},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1002/ajh.25607},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-212594},
  pages     = {1208 -- 1213},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) can present with different histopathological growth patterns. The impact of these histopathological growth patterns on relapse characteristics is unknown. We therefore analyzed paired biopsies obtained at initial diagnosis and relapse from 33 NLPHL patients who had received first-line treatment within German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) trial protocols, and from a second cohort of 41 relapsed NLPHL patients who had been treated outside GHSG studies. Among the 33 GHSG patients, 21 patients presented with a typical growth pattern at initial diagnosis, whereas 12 patients had a variant histology. The histopathological growth patterns at initial diagnosis and at relapse were consistent in 67\% of cases. A variant histology at initial diagnosis was associated with a shorter median time to lymphoma recurrence (2.8 vs 5.2 years; P = .0219). A similar tendency towards a shorter median time to lymphoma recurrence was observed for patients presenting with a variant histology at relapse, irrespective of the growth pattern at initial diagnosis. Results obtained from the 41 NLPHL patients who had been treated outside GHSG studies were comparable (median time to lymphoma recurrence for variant histology vs typical growth pattern at initial diagnosis: 1.5 vs 7.0 years). In conclusion, the histopathological growth pattern remains consistent at relapse in the majority of NLPHL cases, and has major impact on the time of relapse.},
  language  = {en}
}