@article{HauserDornbergerMalzahnetal.2021,
  author    = {Hauser, T. and Dornberger, V. and Malzahn, U. and Grebe, S. J. and Liu, D. and St{\"o}rk, S. and Nauck, M. and Friedrich, N. and D{\"o}rr, M. and Wanner, C. and Krane, V. and Hammer, F.},
  title     = {The effect of spironolactone on diastolic function in haemodialysis patients},
  series = {The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {1573-0743},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10554-021-02176-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-269033},
  pages     = {1927-1936},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is highly prevalent in patients on maintenance haemodialysis (HD) and lacks effective treatment. We investigated the effect of spironolactone on cardiac structure and function with a specific focus on diastolic function parameters. The MiREnDa trial examined the effect of 50 mg spironolactone once daily versus placebo on left ventricular mass index (LVMi) among 97 HD patients during 40 weeks of treatment. In this echocardiographic substudy, diastolic function was assessed using predefined structural and functional parameters including E/e'. Changes in the frequency of HFpEF were analysed using the comprehensive 'HFA-PEFF score'. Complete echocardiographic assessment was available in 65 individuals (59.5 ± 13.0 years, 21.5\% female) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF > 50\%). At baseline, mean E/e' was 15.2 ± 7.8 and 37 (56.9\%) patients fulfilled the criteria of HFpEF according to the HFA-PEFF score. There was no significant difference in mean change of E/e' between the spironolactone group and the placebo group (+ 0.93 ± 5.39 vs. + 1.52 ± 5.94, p = 0.68) or in mean change of left atrial volume index (LAVi) (1.9 ± 12.3 ml/m\(^{2}\) vs. 1.7 ± 14.1 ml/m\(^{2}\), p = 0.89). Furthermore, spironolactone had no significant effect on mean change in LVMi (+ 0.8 ± 14.2 g/m\(^{2}\) vs. + 2.7 ± 15.9 g/m\(^{2}\); p = 0.72) or NT-proBNP (p = 0.96). Treatment with spironolactone did not alter HFA-PEFF score class compared with placebo (p = 0.63). Treatment with 50 mg of spironolactone for 40 weeks had no significant effect on diastolic function parameters in HD patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EdelmannMusialBrightGelbrichetal.2016,
  author    = {Edelmann, Frank and Musial-Bright, Lindy and Gelbrich, Goetz and Trippel, Tobias and Radenovic, Sara and Wachter, Rolf and Inkrot, Simone and Loncar, Goran and Tahirovic, Elvis and Celic, Vera and Veskovic, Jovan and Zdravkovic, Marija and Lainscak, Mitja and Apostolović, Svetlana and Neskovic, Aleksandar N. and Pieske, Burkert and D{\"u}ngen, Hans-Dirk},
  title     = {Tolerability and feasibility of beta-blocker titration in HFpEF versus HFrEF: Insights from the CIBIS-ELD trial},
  series = {JACC: Heart Failure},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {JACC: Heart Failure},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.008},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191022},
  pages     = {140-149},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the tolerability and feasibility of titration of 2 distinctly acting beta-blockers (BB) in elderly heart failure patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. BACKGROUND: Broad evidence supports the use of BB in HFrEF, whereas the evidence for beta blockade in HFpEF is uncertain. METHODS: In the CIBIS-ELD (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly) trial, patients >65 years of age with HFrEF (n = 626) or HFpEF (n = 250) were randomized to bisoprolol or carvedilol. Both BB were up-titrated to the target or maximum tolerated dose. Follow-up was performed after 12 weeks. HFrEF and HFpEF patients were compared regarding tolerability and clinical effects (heart rate, blood pressure, systolic and diastolic functions, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute-walk distance, quality of life, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: For both of the BBs, tolerability and daily dose at 12 weeks were similar. HFpEF patients demonstrated higher rates of dose escalation delays and treatment-related side effects. Similar HR reductions were observed in both groups (HFpEF: 6.6 beats/min; HFrEF: 6.9 beats/min, p = NS), whereas greater improvement in NYHA functional class was observed in HFrEF (HFpEF: 23\% vs. HFrEF: 34\%, p < 0.001). Mean E/e' and left atrial volume index did not change in either group, although E/A increased in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: BB tolerability was comparable between HFrEF and HFpEF. Relevant reductions of HR and blood pressure occurred in both groups. However, only HFrEF patients experienced considerable improvements in clinical parameters and Left ventricular function. Interestingly, beta-blockade had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function in either group. Long-term studies using modern diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are urgently needed to establish whether BB therapy exerts significant clinical benefit in HFpEF. (Comparison of Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in Elderly Heart Failure HF] Patients: A Randomised, Double-Blind Multicentre Study CIBIS-ELD]; ISRCTN34827306).},
  language  = {en}
}