@article{HendricksMuellerFassnachtetal.2022,
  author    = {Hendricks, Anne and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Fassnacht, Martin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Verena A. and Wiegering, Armin and Reibetanz, Joachim},
  title     = {Impact of lymphadenectomy on the oncologic outcome of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma — a systematic review and meta-analysis},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14020291},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254798},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {(1) Background: Locoregional lymphadenectomy (LND) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) may impact oncological outcome, but the findings from individual studies are conflicting. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the oncological value of LND in ACC by summarizing the available literature. (2) Methods: A systematic search on studies published until December 2020 was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The primary outcome was the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival (OS). Two separate meta-analyses were performed for studies including patients with localized ACC (stage I-III) and those including all tumor stages (I-IV). Secondary endpoints included postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). (3) Results: 11 publications were identified for inclusion. All studies were retrospective studies, published between 2001-2020, and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies (N = 807 patients) reported the impact of LND on disease-specific survival in patients with stage I-III ACC and revealed a survival benefit of LND (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95\% confidence interval (95\% CI): 0.26-0.68). Based on results of studies including patients with ACC stage I-IV (2 studies, N = 3934 patients), LND was not associated with a survival benefit (HR = 1.00, 95\% CI: 0.70-1.42). None of the included studies showed an association between LND and postoperative mortality or LOS. (4) Conclusion: Locoregional lymphadenectomy seems to offer an oncologic benefit in patients undergoing curative-intended surgery for localized ACC (stage I-III).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MorisVandenBroeckToscoetal.2016,
  author    = {Moris, Lisa and Van den Broeck, Thomas and Tosco, Lorenzo and Van Baelen, Anthony and Gontero, Paolo and Karnes, Robert Jeffrey and Everaerts, Wouter and Albersen, Maarten and Bastian, Patrick J. and Chlosta, Piotr and Claessens, Frank and Chun, Felix K. and Graefen, Markus and Gratzke, Christian and Kneitz, Burkhard and Marchioro, Giansilvio and Salas, Rafael Sanchez and Tombal, Bertrand and Van Der Poel, Henk and Walz, Jochen Christoph and De Meerleer, Gert and Bossi, Alberto and Haustermans, Karin and Montorsi, Francesco and Van Poppel, Hendrik and Spahn, Martin and Briganti, Alberto and Joniau, Steven},
  title     = {Impact of lymph node burden on survival of high-risk prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection},
  series = {Frontiers in Surgery},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Surgery},
  organization    = {European Multicenter Prostate Cancer Clinical and Translational Research Group (EMPaCT)},
  issn      = {2296-875X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fsurg.2016.00065},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195721},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Aim To determine the impact of the extent of lymph node invasion (LNI) on long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Material and methods In this retrospective study, we examined the data of 1,249 high-risk, non-metastatic PCa patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 1989 and 2011 at eight different tertiary institutions. We fitted univariate and multivariate Cox models to assess independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The number of positive lymph node (LN) was dichotomized according to the most informative cutoff predicting CSS. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed CSS and OS rates. Only patients with at least 10 LNs removed at PLND were included. This cutoff was chosen as a surrogate for a well performed PNLD. Results Mean age was 65 years (median: 66, IQR 60-70). Positive surgical margins were present in 53.7\% (n = 671). Final Gleason score (GS) was 2-6 in 12.7\% (n = 158), 7 in 52\% (n = 649), and 8-10 in 35.4\% (n = 442). The median number of LNs removed during PLND was 15 (IQR 12-17). Of all patients, 1,128 (90.3\%) had 0-3 positive LNs, while 126 (9.7\%) had ≥4 positive LNs. Patients with 0-3 positive LNs had significantly better CSS outcome at 10-year follow-up compared to patients with ≥4 positive LNs (87 vs. 50\%; p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for OS, with a 72 vs. 37\% (p < 0.0001) survival at 10 years for patients with 0-3 vs. ≥4 positive LNs, respectively. At multivariate analysis, final GS of 8-10, salvage ADT therapy, and ≥4 (vs. <4) positive LNs were predictors of worse CSS and OS. Pathological stage pT4 was an additional predictor of worse CSS. Conclusion Four or more positive LNs, pathological stage pT4, and final GS of 8-10 represent independent predictors for worse CSS in patients with high-risk PCa. Primary tumor biology remains a strong driver of tumor progression and patients having ≥4 positive LNs could be considered an enriched patient group in which novel treatment strategies should be studied.},
  language  = {en}
}