@article{HefnerBerberichLanversetal.2018,
  author    = {Hefner, Jochen and Berberich, Sara and Lanvers, Elena and Sanning, Maria and Steimer, Ann-Kathrin and Kunzmann, Volker},
  title     = {Patient-doctor relationship and adherence to capecitabine in outpatients of a German comprehensive cancer center},
  series = {Patient Preference and Adherence},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Patient Preference and Adherence},
  doi       = {10.2147/PPA.S169354},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177143},
  pages     = {1875—1887},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Purpose: The prescribing of oral chemotherapy agents has introduced the new challenge of ensuring patients' adherence to therapy. Aspects of a close patient-doctor relationship are reported to be correlated with adherence to oral anticancer drugs, but data on capecitabine are scarce. Patients and methods: Sixty-four outpatients with a diagnosis of cancer and prescribed capecitabine were recruited from a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. We used the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9), the Medical Adherence Rating Scale (MARS), the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), and the Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS) to assess patients' perceptions and behavior. Medical data were extracted from the charts. Results: Non-adherence was reported by 20\% of the 64 participants. The perceived quality of the patient-doctor relationship was high in general, but it did not emerge as a predictor of adherence in our survey (odds ratio [OR]=0.915, P=0.162, 95\% CI=0.808-1.036). However, beliefs about medicine (OR=1.268, P<0.002; 95\% CI=1.090-1.475) as well as satisfaction with information about medicine (OR=1.252, P<0.040, 95\% CI=1.010-1.551) were predictors of adherence and the quality of the patient-doctor relationship was correlated with both variables (r=0.373, P=0.002 for SIMS sum score; r=0.263, P=0.036 for BMQ necessity/concern difference). Overall, adherence to capecitabine was high with a conviction that the therapy is necessary. However, concerns were expressed regarding the long-term effect of capecitabine use. Patients have unmet information needs regarding interactions of capecitabine with other medicines and the impairment of their intimate life. Conclusions: In order to ensure adherence to capecitabine, our results seem to encourage the default use of modern and perhaps more impersonal means of information brokerage (eg, email, internet). However, the contents of some of patients' informational needs as well as the associations of patients' beliefs and satisfaction about the information received suggest a benefit from a trustful patient-doctor relationship.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LapaKircherHaenscheidetal.2018,
  author    = {Lapa, Constantin and Kircher, Malte and H{\"a}nscheid, Heribert and Schirbel, Andreas and Grigoleit, G{\"o}tz Ulrich and Klinker, Erdwine and B{\"o}ck, Markus and Samnick, Samuel and Pelzer, Theo and Buck, Andreas K},
  title     = {Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a new tool in treatment-refractory sarcoidosis - initial experience in two patients},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.22161},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158983},
  pages     = {644-649},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology that can involve virtually all organ systems. Whereas most patients present without symptoms, progressive and disabling organ failure can occur in up to 10\% of subjects. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has recently received market authorization for treatment of SSTR-positive neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: We describe the first case series comprising two patients with refractory multi-organ involvement of sarcoidosis who received 4 cycles of PRRT. Results: PRRT was well-tolerated without any acute adverse effects. No relevant toxicities could be recorded during follow-up. Therapy resulted in partial response accompanied by a pronounced reduction in pain (patient \#1) and stable disease regarding morphology as well as disease activity (patient \#2), respectively. Conclusion: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in sarcoidosis is feasible and might be a new valuable tool in patients with otherwise treatment-refractory disease. Given the long experience with and good tolerability of PRRT, further evaluation of this new treatment option for otherwise treatment-refractory sarcoidosis in larger patient cohorts is warranted.},
  language  = {en}
}