@article{PhilippAbbrederisHerrmannKnopetal.2015, author = {Philipp-Abbrederis, Kathrin and Herrmann, Ken and Knop, Stefan and Schottelius, Margret and Eiber, Matthias and L{\"u}ckerath, Katharina and Pietschmann, Elke and Habringer, Stefan and Gerngroß, Carlos and Franke, Katharina and Rudelius, Martina and Schirbel, Andreas and Lapa, Constantin and Schwamborn, Kristina and Steidle, Sabine and Hartmann, Elena and Rosenwald, Andreas and Kropf, Saskia and Beer, Ambros J and Peschel, Christian and Einsele, Hermann and Buck, Andreas K and Schwaiger, Markus and G{\"o}tze, Katharina and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Keller, Ulrich}, title = {In vivo molecular imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in patients with advanced multiple myeloma}, series = {EMBO Molecular Medicine}, volume = {7}, journal = {EMBO Molecular Medicine}, number = {4}, doi = {10.15252/emmm.201404698}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-148738}, pages = {477-487}, year = {2015}, abstract = {CXCR4 is a G-protein-coupled receptor that mediates recruitment of blood cells toward its ligand SDF-1. In cancer, high CXCR4 expression is frequently associated with tumor dissemination andpoor prognosis. We evaluated the novel CXCR4 probe [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor for invivo mapping of CXCR4 expression density in mice xenografted with human CXCR4-positive MM cell lines and patients with advanced MM by means of positron emission tomography (PET). [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET provided images with excellent specificity and contrast. In 10 of 14 patients with advanced MM [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT scans revealed MM manifestations, whereas only nine of 14 standard [\(^{18}\)F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans were rated visually positive. Assessment of blood counts and standard CD34\(^{+}\) flow cytometry did not reveal significant blood count changes associated with tracer application. Based on these highly encouraging data on clinical PET imaging of CXCR4 expression in a cohort of MM patients, we conclude that [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET opens a broad field for clinical investigations on CXCR4 expression and for CXCR4-directed therapeutic approaches in MM and other diseases.}, language = {en} } @article{SanderdeJongRosenwaldetal.2014, author = {Sander, Brigitta and de Jong, Daphne and Rosenwald, Andreas and Xie, Wanling and Balagu{\´e}, Olga and Calaminici, Maria and Carreras, Joaquim and Gaulard, Philippe and Gribben, John and Hagenbeek, Anton and Kersten, Marie Jos{\´e} and Molina, Thierry Jo and Lee, Abigail and Montes-Moreno, Santiago and Ott, German and Raemaekers, John and Salles, Gilles and Sehn, Laurie and Thorns, Christoph and Wahlin, Bjorn E. and Gascoyne, Randy D. and Weller, Edie}, title = {The reliability of immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor microenvironment in follicular lymphoma: a validation study from the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium}, series = {Haematologica}, volume = {99}, journal = {Haematologica}, number = {4}, issn = {1592-8721}, doi = {10.3324/haematol.2013.095257}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116875}, pages = {715-725}, year = {2014}, abstract = {The cellular microenvironment in follicular lymphoma is of biological and clinical importance. Studies on the clinical significance of non-malignant cell populations have generated conflicting results, which may partly be influenced by poor reproducibility in immunohistochemical marker quantification. In this study, the reproducibility of manual scoring and automated microscopy based on a tissue microarray of 25 follicular lymphomas as compared to flow cytometry is evaluated. The agreement between manual scoring and flow cytometry was moderate for CD3, low for CD4, and moderate to high for CD8, with some laboratories scoring closer to the flow cytometry results. Agreement in manual quantification across the 7 laboratories was low to moderate for CD3, CD4, CD8 and FOXP3 frequencies, moderate for CD21, low for MIB1 and CD68, and high for CD10. Manual scoring of the architectural distribution resulted in moderate agreement for CD3, CD4 and CD8, and low agreement for FOXP3 and CD68. Comparing manual scoring to automated microscopy demonstrated that manual scoring increased the variability in the low and high frequency interval with some laboratories showing a better agreement with automated scores. Manual scoring reliably identified rare architectural patterns of T-cell infiltrates. Automated microscopy analyses for T-cell markers by two different instruments were highly reproducible and provided acceptable agreement with flow cytometry. These validation results provide explanations for the heterogeneous findings on the prognostic value of the microenvironment in follicular lymphoma. We recommend a more objective measurement, such as computer-assisted scoring, in future studies of the prognostic impact of microenvironment in follicular lymphoma patients.}, language = {en} }