@article{dePazAsisHolzschuhetal.2023,
  author    = {de Paz, V{\´i}ctor and As{\´i}s, Josep D. and Holzschuh, Andrea and Ba{\~n}os-Pic{\´o}n, Laura},
  title     = {Effects of traditional orchard abandonment and landscape context on the beneficial arthropod community in a Mediterranean agroecosystem},
  series = {Insects},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Insects},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2075-4450},
  doi       = {10.3390/insects14030277},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311190},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Agricultural abandonment is one of the main land-use changes in Europe, and its consequences on biodiversity are context- and taxa-dependent. While several studies have worked on this topic, few have focused on traditional orchards, especially in different landscapes and under a Mediterranean climate. In this context, we aimed to determine the effects of almond orchard abandonment on the communities of three groups of beneficial arthropods and the role of the landscape context in modulating these effects. Between February and September 2019, four samplings were carried out in twelve almond orchards (three abandoned and three traditional (active orchards under traditional agricultural management) located in simple landscapes as well as three abandoned and three traditional in complex landscapes). Abandoned and traditional almond orchards harbor different arthropod communities and diversity metrics that are strongly conditioned by seasonality. Abandoned orchards can favor pollinators and natural enemies, providing alternative resources in simple landscapes. However, the role that abandoned orchards play in simple landscapes disappears as the percentage of semi-natural habitats in the landscape increases. Our results show that landscape simplification, through the loss of semi-natural habitats, has negative consequences on arthropod biodiversity, even in traditional farming landscapes with small fields and high crop diversity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{StoevesandtHospKerstanetal.2017,
  author    = {Stoevesandt, Johanna and Hosp, Christine and Kerstan, Andreas and Trautmann, Axel},
  title     = {Safety of 100 µg venom immunotherapy rush protocols in children compared to adults},
  series = {Allergy, Asthma \& Clinical Immunology},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Allergy, Asthma \& Clinical Immunology},
  number    = {32},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13223-017-0204-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-157830},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: There is a paucity of studies examining the safety of venom immunotherapy (VIT) in children. We aimed to assess the incidence of anaphylactic side effects during rush VIT in a cohort of pediatric patients and adult controls. Methods: 72 consecutive cycles of VIT-buildup in 71 children/adolescents aged 7-17 years were retrospectively evaluated and compared to an adult control group (n = 981) with regard to baseline parameters (sex, causative venom, severity of index sting reaction, results of allergy testing, comorbidities) and the incidence of anaphylactic adverse reactions. Results: Compared to adults, severe index sting-induced anaphylaxis was significantly less common in children (P = .001). Children were more likely to suffer from bee venom allergy (P < .001) and showed higher levels of bee venom-specific IgE (P = .013), but lower serum tryptase concentrations (P = .014). The overall rate of VIT-induced anaphylactic reactions was higher in children than in adults (6.9\% vs 2.5\%, P = .046 by univariate analysis). In the final binary logistic regression model, however, only bee VIT (P = .039; odds ratio 2.25; confidence interval 1.04-4.87) and 5-day compared to 3-day buildup protocols (P = .011; odds ratio 2.64; confidence interval 1.25-5.57) were associated with an increased risk of treatment-induced anaphylaxis. All pediatric patients finally reached and tolerated the target maintenance dose of 100 µg. Conclusions: The higher anaphylactic reaction rate observed in pediatric patients may be attributed to a greater prevalence of bee venom allergy. VIT-induced anaphylaxis in children is usually mild and does not affect further updosing and maintenance of VIT.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PahlSiZhang2013,
  author    = {Pahl, Mario and Si, Aung and Zhang, Shaowu},
  title     = {Numerical cognition in bees and other insects},
  series = {Frontiers in Comparative Psychology},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Comparative Psychology},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00162},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-95935},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The ability to perceive the number of objects has been known to exist in vertebrates for a few decades, but recent behavioral investigations have demonstrated that several invertebrate species can also be placed on the continuum of numerical abilities shared with birds, mammals, and reptiles. In this review article, we present the main experimental studies that have examined the ability of insects to use numerical information. These studies have made use of a wide range of methodologies, and for this reason it is striking that a common finding is the inability of the tested animals to discriminate numerical quantities greater than four. Furthermore, the finding that bees can not only transfer learnt numerical discrimination to novel objects, but also to novel numerosities, is strongly suggestive of a true, albeit limited, ability to count. Later in the review, we evaluate the available evidence to narrow down the possible mechanisms that the animals might be using to solve the number-based experimental tasks presented to them. We conclude by suggesting avenues of further research that take into account variables such as the animals' age and experience, as well as complementary cognitive systems such as attention and the time sense.},
  subject      = {Biene},
  language  = {en}
}