@inproceedings{FetzerWeizmanReber2012, author = {Fetzer, Anita and Weizman, Elda and Reber, Elisabeth}, title = {Follow-ups across discourse domains: A cross-cultural exploration of their forms and functions}, organization = {Lehrstuhl englische Sprachwissenschaft}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656}, year = {2012}, abstract = {The edited volume documents the proceedings of the ESF workshop "Follow-ups across discourse domains: a cross-cultural exploration of their forms and functions". It examines the forms and functions of the dialogue act of a follow-up, viz. accepting or challenging a prior communicative act, in political discourse across spoken and written dialogic genres. Specifically, it considers (1) the discourse domains of political interviews, editorials, op-eds and discussion forums, (2) their sequential organization as regards the status of initial (or 1st order) follow-up, a follow-up of a prior follow-up (2nd order follow-up), or nth-order follow-up, and (3) their discursive realization as regards degrees of indirectness and responsiveness which are conceptualized as a continuum along the lines of degrees of explicitness and degrees of responsiveness. The chapters come from the fields of linguistics, discourse analysis, socio-pragmatics, communication, political science and psychology, examining the heterogeneous field of political discourse and its manifestation in diverse discourse genres with respect to evasiveness, indirectness and redundancy in mediated political discourse, professional discourse, discourse identity and doing politics, to name but the most prominent questions.}, subject = {Pragmatik}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Sava2006, author = {Sava, Ramona-Mihaela}, title = {Quest and Conquest in the Fiction of David Lodge}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-23317}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2006}, abstract = {In spite of David Lodge's rejection of the theories labelled as poststructuralist, this thesis proves that his novels can be interpreted from a Foucauldian perspective. The concept of discourse, seen by the French philosopher as intricately linked with knowledge, power and truth, enables the distinction of four main discourses in Lodge's novels, religious, gender, ethnic and literary. The analysis reveals that in David Lodge's fiction there is a perpetual struggle for power illustrating Foucault's idea of the interdependence between power, knowledge, truth and discourses circulated by institutions.}, subject = {Lodge}, language = {en} }