@article{SagivMichaeliAssietal.2015,
  author    = {Sagiv, Jitka Y. and Michaeli, Janna and Assi, Simaan and Mishalian, Inbal and Kisos, Hen and Levy, Liran and Damti, Pazzit and Lumbroso, Delphine and Polyansky, Lola and Sionov, Ronit V. and Ariel, Amiram and Hovav, Avi-Hai and Henke, Erik and Fridlender, Zvi G. and Granot, Zvi},
  title     = {Phenotypic diversity and plasticity in circulating neutrophil subpopulations in cancer},
  series = {Cell Reports},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Cell Reports},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.039},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-144102},
  pages     = {562-573},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Controversy surrounds neutrophil function in cancer because neutrophils were shown to provide both pro-and antitumor functions. We identified a heterogeneous subset of low-density neutrophils (LDNs) that appear transiently in self-resolving inflammation but accumulate continuously with cancer progression. LDNs display impaired neutrophil function and immunosuppressive properties, characteristics that are in stark contrast to those of mature, high-density neutrophils (HDNs). LDNs consist of both immature myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and mature cells that are derived from HDNs in a TGF-beta-dependent mechanism. Our findings identify three distinct populations of circulating neutrophils and challenge the concept that mature neutrophils have limited plasticity. Furthermore, our findings provide a mechanistic explanation to mitigate the controversy surrounding neutrophil function in cancer.},
  language  = {en}
}