@article{GundaKasangKidenyaetal.2013, author = {Gunda, Daniel W. and Kasang, Christa and Kidenya, Benson R. and Kabangila, Rodrick and Mshana, Stephen E. and Kidola, Jeremiah and Kalluvya, Samuel E. and Kongola, Gilbert W. and Klinker, Hartwig}, title = {Plasma Concentrations of Efavirenz and Nevirapine among HIV-Infected Patients with Immunological Failure Attending a Tertiary Hospital in North-Western Tanzania}, series = {PLOS ONE}, volume = {8}, journal = {PLOS ONE}, number = {9}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0075118}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128456}, pages = {e75118}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background: Sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic plasma concentrations of antriretrovirals are the significant causes of treatment failure and toxicity respectively among HIV-infected patients. We conducted this study to determine the pattern of efavirenz and nevirapine plasma drug concentrations among adult HIV-infected patients with immunological failure attending at a tertiary hospital in North-western Tanzania. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adult HIV-infected patients with immunological failure who have been on either efavirenz or nevirapine based antiretroviral regimen for more than 6 months. Patients were serially enrolled through routine Care and Treatment Clinic (CTC) activities. Plasma drug concentrations for efavirenz and nevirapine were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Gas Chromatography (GC) respectively. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data such as viral load and CD4 counts were collected. Data analysis was done using STATA 12. Results: Of the 152 patients with immunological failure enrolled, the sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and supra-therapeutic plasma antiretroviral drug concentrations were found in 43/152 (28.3\%), 76/152 (50.0\%) and 33/152 (21.7\%) respectively. Half of the patients were outside therapeutic window with either sub-therapeutic or supra-therapeutic plasma ARV drug concentrations. There was a significant difference in distribution of ARV adherence (p-value<0.001), NRTI backbone (p-value = 0.039), HIV stage (p-value = 0.026) and viral load (p-value = 0.007) within sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and supratherapeutic ARV plasma drug concentrations. Conclusion: There is a wide inter-individual variability of plasma ARV concentrations among HIV patients with immunological failure, with a large proportion of patients being outside therapeutic window. This variability is significant based on ARV adherence, NRTI backbone, viral load and HIV stage. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could assist identifying these patients early and making timely correction to avoid virological failure, poor immunological outcome and prevent associated drug toxicities. Nonetheless, ARV adherence should be strictly emphasized on HIV patients with immunological failure.}, language = {en} } @article{KristDimeoKeil2013, author = {Krist, Lilian and Dimeo, Fernando and Keil, Thomas}, title = {Can progressive resistance training twice a week improve mobility, muscle strength, and quality of life in very elderly nursing-home residents with impaired mobility? A pilot study}, series = {Clinical Interventions in Aging}, volume = {8}, journal = {Clinical Interventions in Aging}, doi = {10.2147/CIA.S42136}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122176}, pages = {443-448}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Purpose: To determine the effects of progressive resistance training on mobility, muscle strength, and quality of life in nursing-home residents with impaired mobility. Methods: Nursing-home residents aged 77 years and older with impaired mobility were recruited in Berlin, Germany. The eight-week exercise program consisted of progressive resistance training twice a week. Mobility (primary outcome) was assessed with the Elderly Mobility Scale (zero = worst, 20 = best) at baseline and after 8 weeks. Muscle strength (secondary outcome) was determined by the eight-repetition maximum. The Short Form-36 Health Survey was used to assess quality of life. Results: Of the 15 participants (mean age 84 years, range 77-97 years), ten completed the 8-week program. Mobility (Elderly Mobility Scale mean +/- standard deviation pre 14.1 +/- 3.2 and post 17.5 +/- 3.6; P = 0.005) as well as muscle strength of upper and lower limbs improved (from 62\% at chest press up to 108\% at leg extension machine), whereas most quality of life subscales did not show considerable change. Conclusion: Resistance training twice a week over 2 months seemed to considerably improve mobility and muscle strength in persons aged 77-97 years with impaired mobility.}, language = {en} } @article{FruchartDavignonHermansetal.2014, author = {Fruchart, Jean-Charles and Davignon, Jean and Hermans, Michael P. and Al-Rubeaan, Khalid and Amarenco, Pierre and Assmann, Gerd and Barter, Philip and Betteridge, John and Bruckert, Eric and Cuevas, Ada and Farnier, Michel and Ferrannini, Ele and Fioretto, Paola and Genest, Jacques and Ginsberg, Henry N. and Gotto Jr., Antonio M. and Hu, Dayi and Kadowaki, Takashi and Kodama, Tatsuhiko and Krempf, Michel and Matsuzawa, Yuji and N{\´u}{\~n}ez-Cort{\´e}s, Jes{\´u}s Mill{\´a}n and Monfil, Calos Calvo and Ogawa, Hisao and Plutzky, Jorge and Rader, Daniel J. and Sadikot, Shaukat and Santos, Raul D. and Shlyakhto, Evgeny and Sritara, Piyamitr and Sy, Rody and Tall, Alan and Tan, Chee Eng and Tokg{\"o}zoğlu, Lale and Toth, Peter P. and Valensi, Paul and Wanner, Christoph and Zambon, Albertro and Zhu, Junren and Zimmet, Paul}, title = {Residual macrovascular risk in 2013: what have we learned?}, series = {Cardiovascual Diabetology}, volume = {13}, journal = {Cardiovascual Diabetology}, number = {26}, issn = {1475-2840}, doi = {10.1186/1475-2840-13-26}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117546}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Cardiovascular disease poses a major challenge for the 21st century, exacerbated by the pandemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. While best standards of care, including high-dose statins, can ameliorate the risk of vascular complications, patients remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. The Residual Risk Reduction Initiative (R(3)i) has previously highlighted atherogenic dyslipidaemia, defined as the imbalance between proatherogenic triglyceride-rich apolipoprotein B-containing-lipoproteins and antiatherogenic apolipoprotein A-I-lipoproteins (as in high-density lipoprotein, HDL), as an important modifiable contributor to lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk, especially in insulin-resistant conditions. As part of its mission to improve awareness and clinical management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the R(3)i has identified three key priorities for action: i) to improve recognition of atherogenic dyslipidaemia in patients at high cardiometabolic risk with or without diabetes; ii) to improve implementation and adherence to guideline-based therapies; and iii) to improve therapeutic strategies for managing atherogenic dyslipidaemia. The R(3)i believes that monitoring of non-HDL cholesterol provides a simple, practical tool for treatment decisions regarding the management of lipid-related residual cardiovascular risk. Addition of a fibrate, niacin (North and South America), omega-3 fatty acids or ezetimibe are all options for combination with a statin to further reduce non-HDL cholesterol, although lacking in hard evidence for cardiovascular outcome benefits. Several emerging treatments may offer promise. These include the next generation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonists, cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors and monoclonal antibody therapy targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. However, long-term outcomes and safety data are clearly needed. In conclusion, the R(3)i believes that ongoing trials with these novel treatments may help to define the optimal management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia to reduce the clinical and socioeconomic burden of residual cardiovascular risk.}, language = {en} }