@article{PatzerKunzHuflageetal.2023,
  author    = {Patzer, Theresa Sophie and Kunz, Andreas Steven and Huflage, Henner and Conrads, Nora and Luetkens, Karsten Sebastian and Pannenbecker, Pauline and Paul, Mila Marie and Erg{\"u}n, S{\"u}leyman and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Grunz, Jan-Peter},
  title     = {Ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting CT in cadaveric fracture models: spatial frequency is not everything},
  series = {Diagnostics},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Diagnostics},
  number    = {10},
  issn      = {2075-4418},
  doi       = {10.3390/diagnostics13101677},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-319281},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In this study, the impact of reconstruction sharpness on the visualization of the appendicular skeleton in ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD) CT was investigated. Sixteen cadaveric extremities (eight fractured) were examined with a standardized 120 kVp scan protocol (CTDI\(_{vol}\) 10 mGy). Images were reconstructed with the sharpest non-UHR kernel (Br76) and all available UHR kernels (Br80 to Br96). Seven radiologists evaluated image quality and fracture assessability. Interrater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. For quantitative comparisons, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs) were calculated. Subjective image quality was best for Br84 (median 1, interquartile range 1-3; p ≤ 0.003). Regarding fracture assessability, no significant difference was ascertained between Br76, Br80 and Br84 (p > 0.999), with inferior ratings for all sharper kernels (p < 0.001). Interrater agreement for image quality (0.795, 0.732-0.848; p < 0.001) and fracture assessability (0.880; 0.842-0.911; p < 0.001) was good. SNR was highest for Br76 (3.4, 3.0-3.9) with no significant difference to Br80 and Br84 (p > 0.999). Br76 and Br80 produced higher SNRs than all kernels sharper than Br84 (p ≤ 0.026). In conclusion, PCD-CT reconstructions with a moderate UHR kernel offer superior image quality for visualizing the appendicular skeleton. Fracture assessability benefits from sharp non-UHR and moderate UHR kernels, while ultra-sharp reconstructions incur augmented image noise.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LichterPaulPaulietal.2022,
  author    = {Lichter, Katharina and Paul, Mila Marie and Pauli, Martin and Schoch, Susanne and Kollmannsberger, Philip and Stigloher, Christian and Heckmann, Manfred and Sir{\´e}n, Anna-Leena},
  title     = {Ultrastructural analysis of wild-type and RIM1α knockout active zones in a large cortical synapse},
  series = {Cell Reports},
  volume    = {40},
  journal   = {Cell Reports},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111382},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300913},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Rab3A-interacting molecule (RIM) is crucial for fast Ca\(^{2+}\)-triggered synaptic vesicle (SV) release in presynaptic active zones (AZs). We investigated hippocampal giant mossy fiber bouton (MFB) AZ architecture in 3D using electron tomography of rapid cryo-immobilized acute brain slices in RIM1α\(^{-/-}\) and wild-type mice. In RIM1α\(^{-/-}\), AZs are larger with increased synaptic cleft widths and a 3-fold reduced number of tightly docked SVs (0-2 nm). The distance of tightly docked SVs to the AZ center is increased from 110 to 195 nm, and the width of their electron-dense material between outer SV membrane and AZ membrane is reduced. Furthermore, the SV pool in RIM1α\(^{-/-}\) is more heterogeneous. Thus, RIM1α, besides its role in tight SV docking, is crucial for synaptic architecture and vesicle pool organization in MFBs.},
  language  = {en}
}