@article{MuraliHaendel2021, author = {Murali, Supriya and H{\"a}ndel, Barbara}, title = {The latency of spontaneous eye blinks marks relevant visual and auditory information processing}, series = {Journal of Vision}, volume = {21}, journal = {Journal of Vision}, doi = {10.1167/jov.21.6.7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-371361}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Eye blinks are influenced by external sensory and internal cognitive factors, as mainly shown in the visual domain. In previous studies, these factors corresponded to the time period of task-relevant sensory information and were often linked to a motor response. Our aim was to dissociate the influence of overall sensory input duration, task-relevant information duration, and the motor response to further understand how the temporal modulation of blinks compares among sensory modalities. Using a visual and an auditory temporal judgment task, we found that blinks were suppressed during stimulus presentation in both domains and that the overall input length had a significant positive relationship with the length of this suppression (i.e., with the latency of the first blink after stimulus onset). Importantly, excluding the influence of the overall sensory input duration we could show that the duration of task-relevant input had an additional influence on blink latency in the visual and the auditory domain. Our findings further suggest that this influence was not based on sensory input but on top-down processes. We could exclude task difficulty and the timing of the motor response as driving factors in the blink modulation. Our results suggest a sensory domain-independent modulation of blink latencies, introduced by changes in the length of the task-relevant, attended period. Therefore, not only do blinks mark the timing of sensory input or the preparation of the motor output, but they can also act as precise indicators of periods of cognitive processing.}, language = {en} } @article{WangZhangBaietal.2017, author = {Wang, Yiwen and Zhang, Zhen and Bai, Liying and Lin, Chongde and Osinsky, Roman and Hewig, Johannes}, title = {Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {7}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, doi = {10.1038/srep39827}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-181461}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Previous studies have shown that ingroup/outgroup membership influences individual's fairness considerations. However, it is not clear yet how group membership influences brain activity when a recipient evaluates the fairness of asset distribution. In this study, subjects participated as recipients in an Ultimatum Game with alleged members of both an experimentally induced ingroup and outgroup. They either received extremely unequal, moderately unequal, or equal offers from proposers while electroencephalogram was recorded. Behavioral results showed that the acceptance rates for unequal offers were higher when interacting with ingroup partners than with outgroup partners. Analyses of event related potentials revealed that proposers' group membership modulated offer evaluation at earlier processing stages. Feedback-related negativity was more negative for extremely and moderately unequal offers compared to equal offers in the ingroup interaction whereas it did not show differential responses to different offers in the outgroup interaction. Analyses of event related oscillations revealed that the theta power (4-6 Hz) was larger for moderately unequal offers than equal offers in the ingroup interaction whereas it did not show differential responses to different offers in the outgroup interaction. Thus, early mechanisms of fairness evaluation are strongly modulated by the ingroup/outgroup membership of the interaction partner.}, language = {en} } @article{MacLeodSurulirajGalletal.2021, author = {MacLeod, Lucy and Suruliraj, Banuchitra and Gall, Dominik and Bessenyei, Kitti and Hamm, Sara and Romkey, Isaac and Bagnell, Alexa and Mattheisen, Manuel and Muthukumaraswamy, Viswanath and Orji, Rita and Meier, Sandra}, title = {A Mobile Sensing App to Monitor Youth Mental Health: Observational Pilot Study}, series = {JMIR mHealth and uHealth}, volume = {9}, journal = {JMIR mHealth and uHealth}, doi = {10.2196/20638}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-370054}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Background: Internalizing disorders are the most common psychiatric problems observed among youth in Canada. Sadly, youth with internalizing disorders often avoid seeking clinical help and rarely receive adequate treatment. Current methods of assessing internalizing disorders usually rely on subjective symptom ratings, but internalizing symptoms are frequently underreported, which creates a barrier to the accurate assessment of these symptoms in youth. Therefore, novel assessment tools that use objective data need to be developed to meet the highest standards of reliability, feasibility, scalability, and affordability. Mobile sensing technologies, which unobtrusively record aspects of youth behaviors in their daily lives with the potential to make inferences about their mental health states, offer a possible method of addressing this assessment barrier. Objective: This study aims to explore whether passively collected smartphone sensor data can be used to predict internalizing symptoms among youth in Canada. Methods: In this study, the youth participants (N=122) completed self-report assessments of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Next, the participants installed an app, which passively collected data about their mobility, screen time, sleep, and social interactions over 2 weeks. Then, we tested whether these passive sensor data could be used to predict internalizing symptoms among these youth participants. Results: More severe depressive symptoms correlated with more time spent stationary (r=0.293; P=.003), less mobility (r=0.271; P=.006), higher light intensity during the night (r=0.227; P=.02), and fewer outgoing calls (r=-0.244; P=.03). In contrast, more severe anxiety symptoms correlated with less time spent stationary (r=-0.249; P=.01) and greater mobility (r=0.234; P=.02). In addition, youths with higher anxiety scores spent more time on the screen (r=0.203; P=.049). Finally, adding passively collected smartphone sensor data to the prediction models of internalizing symptoms significantly improved their fit. Conclusions: Passively collected smartphone sensor data provide a useful way to monitor internalizing symptoms among youth. Although the results replicated findings from adult populations, to ensure clinical utility, they still need to be replicated in larger samples of youth. The work also highlights intervention opportunities via mobile technology to reduce the burden of internalizing symptoms early on.}, language = {en} } @article{LudwigDignathLukas2021, author = {Ludwig, Jonas and Dignath, David and Lukas, Sarah}, title = {Positive and negative action-effects improve task-switching performance}, series = {Acta Psychologica}, volume = {221}, journal = {Acta Psychologica}, doi = {10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103440}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-369638}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Anticipation of one's own actions' effects drives goal-directed behavior. In multitasking environments, the learning of stable action-effect associations seems particularly important, because establishing reliable response-effect associations for multiple competing tasks may help to differentiate between these tasks and thereby improve task-switching performance. Action-effects not only have cognitive, but also motivational aspects and often the consequences of our actions are hedonically marked. Thus, the anticipated hedonic quality of action-effects may also become part of the task representation, and positive and negative affect may distinctly modulate task-switching performance. We report a pre-registered experiment (N = 120) designed to examine how positive, negative, and neutral valence of action-effects impact performance in a cued task-switching paradigm. Pictures from the IAPS database were used to manipulate the action-effects' valence. Affective valence determined reaction times: participants who learned positive or negative action-effects responded faster than participants in the control condition. In particular, task-switch trials were faster in both conditions than in the control condition, while task-repetition trials were comparable across valence conditions. Our results further suggest that performance improvements in the positive and negative valence conditions occurred for different reasons. Negative action-effects expedited responses specifically for the task that produced the unpleasant outcome, while positive affect more generally promoted performance of both tasks. These findings point toward distinct roles of positive and negative valence of action-effects in regulating multitasking performance.}, language = {en} } @article{LevitisGouldvan PraagGauetal.2021, author = {Levitis, Elizabeth and Gould van Praag, Cassandra D and Gau, R{\´e}mi and Heunis, Stephan and DuPre, Elizabeth and Kiar, Gregory and Bottenhorn, Katherine L and Glatard, Tristan and Nikolaidis, Aki and Whitaker, Kirstie Jane and Mancini, Matteo and Niso, Guiomar and Afyouni, Soroosh and Alonso-Ortiz, Eva and Appelhoff, Stefan and Arnatkeviciute, Aurina and Atay, Selim Melvin and Auer, Tibor and Baracchini, Giulia and Bayer, Johanna M M and Beauvais, Michael J S and Bijsterbosch, Janine D and Bilgin, Isil P and Bollmann, Saskia and Bollmann, Steffen and Botvinik-Nezer, Rotem and Bright, Molly G and Calhoun, Vince D and Chen, Xiao and Chopra, Sidhant and Chuan-Peng, Hu and Close, Thomas G and Cookson, Savannah L and Craddock, R Cameron and De La Vega, Alejandro and De Leener, Benjamin and Demeter, Damion V and Di Maio, Paola and Dickie, Erin W and Eickhoff, Simon B and Esteban, Oscar and Finc, Karolina and Frigo, Matteo and Ganesan, Saampras and Ganz, Melanie and Garner, Kelly G and Garza-Villarreal, Eduardo A and Gonzalez-Escamilla, Gabriel and Goswami, Rohit and Griffiths, John D and Grootswagers, Tijl and Guay, Samuel and Guest, Olivia and Handwerker, Daniel A and Herholz, Peer and Heuer, Katja and Huijser, Dorien C and Iacovella, Vittorio and Joseph, Michael J E and Karakuzu, Agah and Keator, David B and Kobeleva, Xenia and Kumar, Manoj and Laird, Angela R and Larson-Prior, Linda J and Lautarescu, Alexandra and Lazari, Alberto and Legarreta, Jon Haitz and Li, Xue-Ying and Lv, Jinglei and Mansour L., Sina and Meunier, David and Moraczewski, Dustin and Nandi, Tulika and Nastase, Samuel A and Nau, Matthias and Noble, Stephanie and Norgaard, Martin and Obungoloch, Johnes and Oostenveld, Robert and Orchard, Edwina R and Pinho, Ana Lu{\´i}sa and Poldrack, Russell A and Qiu, Anqi and Raamana, Pradeep Reddy and Rokem, Ariel and Rutherford, Saige and Sharan, Malvika and Shaw, Thomas B and Syeda, Warda T and Testerman, Meghan M and Toro, Roberto and Valk, Sofie L and Van Den Bossche, Sofie and Varoquaux, Ga{\"e}l and V{\´a}ša, František and Veldsman, Michele and Vohryzek, Jakub and Wagner, Adina S and Walsh, Reubs J and White, Tonya and Wong, Fu-Te and Xie, Xihe and Yan, Chao-Gan and Yang, Yu-Fang and Yee, Yohan and Zanitti, Gaston E and Van Gulick, Ana E and Duff, Eugene and Maumet, Camille}, title = {Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences—An OHBM-Open Science perspective}, series = {GigaScience}, volume = {10}, journal = {GigaScience}, doi = {10.1093/gigascience/giab051}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-371574}, pages = {1-14}, year = {2021}, abstract = {As the global health crisis unfolded, many academic conferences moved online in 2020. This move has been hailed as a positive step towards inclusivity in its attenuation of economic, physical, and legal barriers and effectively enabled many individuals from groups that have traditionally been underrepresented to join and participate. A number of studies have outlined how moving online made it possible to gather a more global community and has increased opportunities for individuals with various constraints, e.g., caregiving responsibilities. Yet, the mere existence of online conferences is no guarantee that everyone can attend and participate meaningfully. In fact, many elements of an online conference are still significant barriers to truly diverse participation: the tools used can be inaccessible for some individuals; the scheduling choices can favour some geographical locations; the set-up of the conference can provide more visibility to well-established researchers and reduce opportunities for early-career researchers. While acknowledging the benefits of an online setting, especially for individuals who have traditionally been underrepresented or excluded, we recognize that fostering social justice requires inclusivity to actively be centered in every aspect of online conference design. Here, we draw from the literature and from our own experiences to identify practices that purposefully encourage a diverse community to attend, participate in, and lead online conferences. Reflecting on how to design more inclusive online events is especially important as multiple scientific organizations have announced that they will continue offering an online version of their event when in-person conferences can resume.}, language = {en} } @article{AndreattaPauli2019, author = {Andreatta, Marta and Pauli, Paul}, title = {Generalization of appetitive conditioned responses}, series = {Psychophysiology}, volume = {56}, journal = {Psychophysiology}, doi = {10.1111/psyp.13397}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-221132}, year = {2019}, abstract = {A stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) associated with an appetitive unconditioned stimulus (US) acquires positive properties and elicits appetitive conditioned responses (CR). Such associative learning has been examined extensively in animals with food as the US, and results are used to explain psychopathologies (e.g., substance-related disorders or obesity). Human studies on appetitive conditioning exist, too, but we still know little about generalization processes. Understanding these processes may explain why stimuli not associated with a drug, for instance, can elicit craving. Forty-seven hungry participants underwent an appetitive conditioning protocol during which one of two circles with different diameters (CS+) became associated with an appetitive US (chocolate or salty pretzel, according to participants' preference) but never the other circle (CS-). During generalization, US were delivered twice and the two CS were presented again plus four circles (generalization stimuli, GS) with gradually increasing diameters from CS- to CS+. We found successful appetitive conditioning as reflected in appetitive subjective ratings (positive valence, higher contingency) and physiological responses (startle attenuation and larger skin conductance responses) to CS+ versus CS-, and, importantly, both measures confirmed generalization as indicated by generalization gradients. Small changes in CS-US contingency during generalization may have weakened generalization processes on the physiological level. Considering that appetitive conditioned responses can be generalized to non-US-associated stimuli, a next important step would be to investigate risk factors that mediate overgeneralization.}, language = {en} } @misc{OPUS4-37154, title = {Erratum: M. S. Pasqualini / M. Macht / H. Ellgring, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for People with Parkinson's Disease and Caregivers https://doi.org/10.25972/WUP-978-3-95826-227-0}, publisher = {W{\"u}rzburg University Press}, address = {W{\"u}rzburg}, doi = {10.25972/WUP-37154}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-371543}, pages = {1}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Erratum for M. S. Pasqualini / M. Macht / H. Ellgring, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for People with Parkinson's Disease and Caregivers (W{\"u}rzburg, 2024). https://doi.org/10.25972/WUP-978-3-95826-227-0}, language = {en} } @article{FeistauerRichter2018, author = {Feistauer, Daniela and Richter, Tobias}, title = {Validity of students' evaluations of teaching: Biasing effects of likability and prior subject interest}, series = {Studies in Educational Evaluation}, volume = {59}, journal = {Studies in Educational Evaluation}, doi = {10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.009}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228005}, pages = {168-178}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This study examined the validity of students' evaluations of teaching as an instrument for measuring teaching quality by examining the effects of likability and prior subject interest as potential biasing effects, measured at the beginning of the course and at the time of evaluation. University students (N = 260) evaluated psychology courses in one semester at a German university with a standardized questionnaire, yielding 517 data points. Cross-classified multilevel analyses revealed fixed effects of likability at both times of measurement and fixed effects of prior subject interest measured at the beginning of the course. Likability seems to exert a substantial bias on student evaluations of teaching, albeit one that is overestimated when measured at the time of evaluation. In contrast, prior subject interest seems to introduce a weak bias. Considering that likability bears no conceptual relationship to teaching quality, these findings point to a compromised validity of students' evaluations of teaching.}, language = {en} } @article{LummaValkBoeckleretal.2018, author = {Lumma, Anna-Lena and Valk, Sofie L. and B{\"o}ckler, Anne and Vrtička, Pascal and Singer, Tania}, title = {Change in emotional self-concept following socio-cognitive training relates to structural plasticity of the prefrontal cortex}, series = {Brain and Behavior}, volume = {8}, journal = {Brain and Behavior}, doi = {10.1002/brb3.940}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-237395}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Introduction Self-referential processing is a key component of the emotional self-concept. Previous studies have shown that emotional self-referential processing is related to structure and function of cortical midline areas such as medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and that it can be altered on a behavioral level by specific mental training practices. However, it remains unknown how behavioral training-related change in emotional self-concept content relates to structural plasticity. Methods To address this issue, we examined the relationship between training-induced change in participant's emotional self-concept measured through emotional word use in the Twenty Statement Test and change in cortical thickness in the context of a large-scale longitudinal mental training study called the ReSource Project. Results Based on prior behavioral findings showing increased emotional word use particularly after socio-cognitive training targeting perspective-taking capacities, this study extended these results by revealing that individual differences in the degree to which participants changed their emotional self-concept after training was positively related to cortical thickness change in right mPFC extending to dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC). Furthermore, increased self-related negative emotional word use after training was positively associated with cortical thickness change in left pars orbitalis and bilateral dlPFC. Conclusions Our findings reveal training-related structural brain change in regions known to be involved in self-referential processing and cognitive control, and could indicate a relationship between restructuring of the emotional self-concept content as well as reappraisal of negative aspects and cortical thickness change. As such, our findings can guide the development of psychological interventions targeted to alter specific facets of the self-concept.}, language = {en} } @article{KieferTrumppSchaitzetal.2019, author = {Kiefer, Markus and Trumpp, Natalie M. and Schaitz, Caroline and Reuss, Heiko and Kunde, Wilfried}, title = {Attentional modulation of masked semantic priming by visible and masked task cues}, series = {Cognition}, volume = {187}, journal = {Cognition}, doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.013}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-325751}, pages = {62-77}, year = {2019}, abstract = {In contrast to classical theories of cognitive control, recent evidence suggests that cognitive control and unconscious automatic processing influence each other. First, masked semantic priming, an index of unconscious automatic processing, depends on attention to semantics induced by a previously executed task. Second, cognitive control operations (e.g., implementation of task sets indicating how to process a particular stimulus) can be activated by masked task cues, presented outside awareness. In this study, we combined both lines of research. We investigated in three experiments whether induction tasks and presentation of visible or masked task cues, which signal subsequent semantic or perceptual tasks but do not require induction task execution, comparably modulate masked semantic priming. In line with previous research, priming was consistently larger following execution of a semantic rather than a perceptual induction task. However, we observed in experiment 1 (masked letter cues) a reversed priming pattern following task cues (larger priming following cues signaling perceptual tasks) compared to induction tasks. Experiment 2 (visible letter cues) and experiment 3 (visible color cues) showed that this reversed priming pattern depended only on apriori associations between task cues and task elements (task set dominance), but neither on awareness nor on the verbal or non-verbal format of the cues. These results indicate that task cues have the power to modulate subsequent masked semantic priming through attentional mechanisms. Task-set dominance conceivably affects the time course of task set activation and inhibition in response to task cues and thus the direction of their modulatory effects on priming.}, language = {en} }