@article{HarrisMaxwellO'Connoretal.2013,
  author    = {Harris, Fiona M. and Maxwell, Margaret and O'Connor, Rory C. and Coyne, James and Arensman, Ella and Andr{\´a}s, Sz{\´e}kely and Gusm{\~a}o, Ricardo and Coffey, Claire and Costa, Susana and Zoltan, Cserh{\´a}ti and Koburger, Nicole and van Audenhove, Chantal and McDaid, David and Maloney, Julia and V{\"a}rnik, Peeter and Hegerl, Ulrich},
  title     = {Developing social capital in implementing a complex intervention: a process evaluation of the early implementation of a suicide prevention intervention in four European countries},
  series = {BMC Public Health},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {BMC Public Health},
  number    = {158},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-2458-13-158},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122117},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Background: Variation in the implementation of complex multilevel interventions can impact on their delivery and outcomes. Few suicide prevention interventions, especially multilevel interventions, have included evaluation of both the process of implementation as well as outcomes. Such evaluation is essential for the replication of interventions, for interpreting and understanding outcomes, and for improving implementation science. This paper reports on a process evaluation of the early implementation stage of an optimised suicide prevention programme (OSPI-Europe) implemented in four European countries. Methods: The process analysis was conducted within the framework of a realist evaluation methodology, and involved case studies of the process of implementation in four European countries. Datasets include: repeated questionnaires to track progress of implementation including delivery of individual activities and their intensity; serial interviews and focus groups with stakeholder groups; and detailed observations at OSPI implementation team meetings. Results: Analysis of local contexts in each of the four countries revealed that the advisory group was a key mechanism that had a substantial impact on the ease of implementation of OSPI interventions, particularly on their ability to recruit to training interventions. However, simply recruiting representatives of key organisations into an advisory group is not sufficient to achieve impact on the delivery of interventions. In order to maximise the potential of high level 'gatekeepers', it is necessary to first transform them into OSPI stakeholders. Motivations for OSPI participation as a stakeholder included: personal affinity with the shared goals and target groups within OSPI; the complementary and participatory nature of OSPI that adds value to pre-existing suicide prevention initiatives; and reciprocal reward for participants through access to the extended network capacity that organisations could accrue for themselves and their organisations from participation in OSPI. Conclusions: Exploring the role of advisory groups and the meaning of participation for these participants revealed some key areas for best practice in implementation: careful planning of the composition of the advisory group to access target groups; the importance of establishing common goals; the importance of acknowledging and complementing existing experience and activity; and facilitating an equivalence of benefit from network participation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MollRocesFederle2013,
  author    = {Moll, Karin and Roces, Flavio and Federle, Walter},
  title     = {How Load-Carrying Ants Avoid Falling Over: Mechanical Stability during Foraging in Atta vollenweideri Grass-Cutting Ants},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0052816},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131211},
  pages     = {e52816},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Background: Foraging workers of grass-cutting ants (Atta vollenweideri) regularly carry grass fragments larger than their Fragment length has been shown to influence the ants' running speed and thereby the colony's food intake rate. We investigated whether and how grass-cutting ants maintain stability when carrying fragments of two different lengths but identical mass. Principal Findings: Ants carried all fragments in an upright, backwards-tilted position, but held long fragments more vertically than short ones. All carrying ants used an alternating tripod gait, where mechanical stability was increased by overlapping stance phases of consecutive steps. The overlap was greatest for ants carrying long fragments, resulting in more legs contacting the ground simultaneously. For all ants, the projection of the total centre of mass (ant and fragment) was often outside the supporting tripod, i.e. the three feet that would be in stance for a non-overlapping tripod gait. Stability was only achieved through additional legs in ground contact. Tripod stability (quantified as the minimum distance of the centre of mass to the edge of the supporting tripod) was significantly smaller for ants with long fragments. Here, tripod stability was lowest at the beginning of each step, when the center of mass was near the posterior margin of the supporting tripod. By contrast, tripod stability was lowest at the end of each step for ants carrying short fragments. Consistently, ants with long fragments mainly fell backwards, whereas ants carrying short fragments mainly fell forwards or to the side. Assuming that transporting ants adjust neither the fragment angle nor the gait, they would be less stable and more likely to fall over. Conclusions: In grass-cutting ants, the need to maintain static stability when carrying long grass fragments has led to multiple kinematic adjustments at the expense of a reduced material transport rate.},
  language  = {en}
}