@incollection{LanglotzHommers1978,
  author    = {Langlotz, Maren and Hommers, Wilfried},
  title     = {Ziele, Aufbau und Durchf{\"u}hrung des MURT},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-73113},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {1978},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {MURT},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{HommersZienertSteller1982,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Zienert, Hans Joachim and Steller, Max},
  title     = {Erh{\"o}hung sozialer Kompetenz jugendlicher Inhaftierter durch modellunterst{\"u}tztes Rollentraining (MURT)},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-44062},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {1982},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Klinische Psychologie / Klinische Psychiatrie / Aufsatzsammlung / Gemeindepsychologie / Familientherapie / Jugendpsychotherapie / Kinderpsychother},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HommersTrempler1979,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Trempler, V.},
  title     = {Zur Problematik sozialpsychologischer Interpretation des Verhaltens von Kindern in Zwei-Personen-Spielen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43860},
  year      = {1979},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HommersStellerZienert1978,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Steller, Max and Zienert, Hans-Joachim},
  title     = {{\"U}ber die Verbesserung des Rollenspiels von jugendlichen Inhaftierten in sozialen Interaktionen durch Modellunterst{\"u}tztes Rollenspiel},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43763},
  year      = {1978},
  abstract  = {15 jugendliche Inhaftierte einer Entlassungsabteilung nahmen an einem Modellunterst{\"u}tzten Rollentraining in schwierigen Situationen nach der Entlassung teil. Videoaufnahmen von nicht ge{\"u}bten Szenen wurden im Paarvergleich von Ratern auf die Besserung des Rollenspielverhaltens beurteilt. Die Ergebnisse sprechen f{\"u}r eine Verhaltensbesserung, die auf das Modellunterst{\"u}tzte Rollentraining zur{\"u}ckgef{\"u}hrt werden kann.},
  subject      = {Kinderpsychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HommersStellerZienert1976,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Steller, Max and Zienert, Hans Joachim},
  title     = {Psychologische Entlassungsvorbereitung bei jugendlichen Strafgefangenen - Forschungsprogramm eines Vollzugsversuchs},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-44079},
  year      = {1976},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Kriminologie / Strafrecht / Zeitschrift / Strafrechtsreform},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HommersSteller1977,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Steller, Max},
  title     = {Zur Diagnose der Therapiemotivation durch konfigurale Klassifikation},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43416},
  year      = {1977},
  abstract  = {Es wird ein konfigural-analytisches Verfahren zur Erfassung von f{\"u}nf Variablen der Therapiemotivation (Leidensdruck, Unzufriedenheit, {\"A}nderungswunsch, Hilfewunsch und Erfolgserwartung) beschrieben. Die Methode besteht aus einer Kombination der Auswahl zutreffender Selbstbeschreibungen ("Probleme") und der Beantwortung motivationsbezogener Zusatzfragen. Jeder Pb wird so zu seinen spezifischen Problemen hinsichtlich der Auspr{\"a}gung therapierelevanter motivationaler Variablen befragt. Aus der Beantwortung der Zusatzfragen k{\"o}nnen verschiedene Therapiemotivations- Syndrome (TMS) gebildet werden. Die statistische Absicherung des individuellen Vorkommens eines TMS in den Zusatzbefragungen erfolgt {\"u}ber die Multinominalverteilung. Dabei wird von der H{\"a}ufigkeit ausgew{\"a}hlter Probleme eines Pb abstrahiert. Die Erprobung des Verfahrens wurde an 211 Inhaftierten einer Jugendstrafanstalt als potentieller Klienten-Population vorgenommen. Als Kontrollgruppe dienten 207 Berufssch{\"u}ler vergleichbaren Alters. W{\"a}hrend bei den Berufssch{\"u}lern die H{\"a}ufigkeit bei der Klassifikation in verschiedene TMS-Gruppen immer im zuf{\"a}lligen Bereich lagen, konnten bei den Delinquenten {\"u}berzuf{\"a}llig h{\"a}ufig besetzte Gruppenst{\"a}rken gefunden werden. In der Diskussion wurde auf den Unterschied des hier benutzten Klassifikationsverfahrens zur Konfigurations-Frequenzanalyse und zu Maßen Externaler-Internaler-Kontrolle eingegangen. Außerdem wurden Implikationen der Diagnose von Klienten-Therapiemotivation ftir die Entwicklung therapeutischer Verfahren aufgezeigt.},
  subject      = {Psychologische Diagnostik / Psychologie / Differentielle Psychologie / Zeitschrift},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{HommersSteller1977,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Steller, Max},
  title     = {Konfigurale Klassifikation von Delinquenten durch Variablen der Therapiemotivation},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43501},
  year      = {1977},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{HommersSchmidtAtzertHess1994,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Schmidt-Atzert, L. and Heß, M.},
  title     = {Der I S T 70: {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung eines Verfahrens},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43871},
  year      = {1994},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HommersLewandEhrmann2012,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Lewand, Martin and Ehrmann, Dominic},
  title     = {Testing the moral algebra of two Kohlbergian informers},
  series = {Ps{\´i}cologica},
  volume    = {33},
  journal   = {Ps{\´i}cologica},
  number    = {3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133917},
  pages     = {515-532},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {This paper seeks to unify two major theories of moral judgment: Kohlberg's stage theory and Anderson's moral information integration theory. Subjects were told about thoughts of actors in Kohlberg's classic altruistic Heinz dilemma and in a new egoistical dilemma. These actors's thoughts represented Kohlberg's stages I (Personal Risk) and IV (Societal Risk) and had three levels, High, Medium, and Low. They were presented singly and in a 3 x 3 integration design. Subjects judged how many months of prison the actor deserved. The data supported the averaging model of moral integration theory, whereas Kohlberg's theory has no way to handle the integration problem. Following this, subjects ranked statements related to Kohlberg's first four stages in a procedure similar to that of Rest (1975). Higher score went with larger effect of Societal Risk as predicted by Kohlberg's theory. But contrary to Kohlberg's theory, no age trends were found. Also strongly contrary to Kohlberg's theory, effects of Personal Risk (Stage I) and Societal Risk (Stage IV) correlated positively.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HommersLee2010,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Lee, Wha-Yong},
  title     = {Unifying Kohlberg with Information Integration: The Moral Algebra of Recompense and of Kohlbergian Moral Informers},
  series = {Psicol{\´o}gica},
  journal   = {Psicol{\´o}gica},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85875},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In order to unify two major theories of moral judgment, a novel task is employed which combines elements of Kohlberg´s stage theory and of the theory of information integration. In contrast to the format of Kohlberg´s moral judgment interview, a nonverbal and quantitative response which makes low demands on verbal facility was used . Moral informers differing in value, i.e. high and low, are presented. The differences in effect of those two pieces of information should be substantial for a person at that specific moral stage, but small for a person at a different stage. Hence, these differences may diagnose the person's moral stage in the simplest possible way as the two levels of each of the thoughts were about typical content of the four Kohlbergian preconventional and conventional stages. The novel task allowed additionally to measure the influence of another moral concept which was about the non-Kohlbergian moral concept of recompense. After a training phase, pairs of those thoughts were presented to allow for the study of integration and individual differences. German and Korean children, 8, 10, and 12 years in age, judged deserved punishment. The patterns of means, correlations and factor loadings showed that elements of both theories can be unified, but produced unexpected results also. Additive integration of each of the two pairs of moral informers appeared, either with two Kohlbergian moral informers or with another Kohlbergian moral informer in combination with information about recompense. Also cultural independence as well as dependence, developmental changes between 8 and 10 years, and an outstanding moral impact of recompense in size and distinctiveness were observed.},
  language  = {en}
}