@article{GagyorGreserHeuschmannetal.2021,
  author    = {G{\´a}gyor, Ildik{\´o} and Greser, Alexandra and Heuschmann, Peter and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Maun, Andy and Bleidorn, Jutta and Heintze, Christoph and Jede, Felix and Eckmanns, Tim and Klingeberg, Anja and Mentzel, Anja and Schiemann, Guido},
  title     = {REDuction of Antibiotic RESistance (REDARES) in urinary tract infections using treatments according to national clinical guidelines: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a multimodal intervention in primary care},
  series = {BMC Infectious Diseases},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {BMC Infectious Diseases},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12879-021-06660-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264725},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common cause of prescribing antibiotics in family medicine. In Germany, about 40\% of UTI-related prescriptions are second-line antibiotics, which contributes to emerging resistance rates. To achieve a change in the prescribing behaviour among family physicians (FPs), this trial aims to implement the guideline recommendations in German family medicine. Methods/design: In a randomized controlled trial, a multimodal intervention will be developed and tested in family practices in four regions across Germany. The intervention will consist of three elements: information on guideline recommendations, information on regional resistance and feedback of prescribing behaviour for FPs on a quarterly basis. The effect of the intervention will be compared to usual practice. The primary endpoint is the absolute difference in the mean of prescribing rates of second-line antibiotics among the intervention and the control group after 12 months. To detect a 10\% absolute difference in the prescribing rate after one year, with a significance level of 5\% and a power of 86\%, a sample size of 57 practices per group will be needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 10\%, an overall number of 128 practices will be required. The accompanying process evaluation will provide information on feasibility and acceptance of the intervention. Discussion: If proven effective and feasible, the components of the intervention can improve adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines and contribute to antimicrobial stewardship in ambulatory care.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GybergDeBacquerDeBackeretal.2015,
  author    = {Gyberg, Viveca and De Bacquer, Dirk and De Backer, Guy and Jennings, Catriona and Kotseva, Kornelia and Mellbin, Linda and Schnell, Oliver and Tuomilehto, Jaakko and Wood, David and Ryden, Lars and Amouyel, Philippe and Bruthans, Jan and Conde, Almudena Castro and Cifkova, Renata and Deckers, Jaap W. and De Sutter, Johan and Dilic, Mirza and Dolzhenko, Maryna and Erglis, Andrejs and Fras, Zlatko and Gaita, Dan and Gotcheva, Nina and Goudevenos, John and Heuschmann, Peter and Laucevicius, Aleksandras and Lehto, Seppo and Lovic, Dragan and Milicic, Davor and Moore, David and Nicolaides, Evagoras and Oganov, Raphae and Pajak, Andrzej and Pogosova, Nana and Reiner, Zeljko and Stagmo, Martin and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Tokg{\"o}zoglu, Lale and Vulic, Dusko},
  title     = {Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology},
  series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  number    = {133},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12933-015-0296-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141358},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. Methods: A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. Results: A total of 2846 (46 \%) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19 \%) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35 \%) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60 \%, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54 \% and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28 \%. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0 \% (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53 \% and 11 \% of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0 \% (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69 \% reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (approximate to 40 \%) and only 27 \% of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. Conclusions: Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MorbachWagnerGuentneretal.2017,
  author    = {Morbach, Caroline and Wagner, Martin and G{\"u}ntner, Stefan and Malsch, Carolin and Oezkur, Mehmet and Wood, David and Kotseva, Kornelia and Leyh, Rainer and Ertl, Georg and Karmann, Wolfgang and Heuschmann, Peter U and St{\"o}rk, Stefan},
  title     = {Heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease: Prevalence, characteristics and guideline implementation - Results from the German EuroAspire IV cohort},
  series = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  number    = {108},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12872-017-0543-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-157738},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: Adherence to pharmacotherapeutic treatment guidelines in patients with heart failure (HF) is of major prognostic importance, but thorough implementation of guidelines in routine care remains insufficient. Our aim was to investigate prevalence and characteristics of HF in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), and to assess the adherence to current HF guidelines in patients with HF stage C, thus identifying potential targets for the optimization of guideline implementation. Methods: Patients from the German sample of the European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EuroAspire) IV survey with a hospitalization for CHD within the previous six to 36 months providing valid data on echocardiography as well as on signs and symptoms of HF were categorized into stages of HF: A, prevalence of risk factors for developing HF; B, asymptomatic but with structural heart disease; C, symptomatic HF. A Guideline Adherence Indicator (GAI-3) was calculated for patients with reduced (≤40\%) left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) as number of drugs taken per number of drugs indicated; beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were considered. Results: 509/536 patients entered analysis. HF stage A was prevalent in n = 20 (3.9\%), stage B in n = 264 (51.9\%), and stage C in n = 225 (44.2\%) patients; 94/225 patients were diagnosed with HFrEF (42\%). Stage C patients were older, had a longer duration of CHD, and a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension. Awareness of pre-diagnosed HF was low (19\%). Overall GAI-3 of HFrEF patients was 96.4\% with a trend towards lower GAI-3 in patients with lower LVEF due to less thorough MRA prescription. Conclusions: In our sample of CHD patients, prevalence of HF stage C was high and a sizable subgroup suffered from HFrEF. Overall, pharmacotherapy was fairly well implemented in HFrEF patients, although somewhat worse in patients with more reduced ejection fraction. Two major targets were identified possibly suited to further improve the implementation of HF guidelines: 1) increase patients´ awareness of diagnosis and importance of HF; and 2) disseminate knowledge about the importance of appropriately implementing the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Trial registration: This is a cross-sectional analysis of a non-interventional study. Therefore, it was not registered as an interventional trial.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Steimann2009,
  author    = {Steimann, Iris},
  title     = {Effekt von Pharmakotherapie und Komorbidit{\"a}t auf die Prognose chronisch herzinsuffizienter Patienten - eine prospektive Kohortenstudie},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-36229},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {Die chronische Herzinsuffizienz ist eine sehr h{\"a}ufige Erkrankung des h{\"o}heren Lebensalters und eine der wichtigsten Todesursachen in den Industrienationen. Die Prognose der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz konnte durch Einf{\"u}hrung einer Therapie mit ACE-Hemmern/AT1-Antagonisten und Betablockern deutlich verbessert werden. Allerdings wurde die Effektivit{\"a}t einer leitliniengerechten Pharmakotherapie der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz bisher nicht nachgewiesen. Ziel der vorliegenden prospektiven Kohortenstudie war es, diesen Effekt auf den Tod jeder Ursache, je nach Grad der Einhaltung der leitliniengerechten Pharmakotherapie, in einem konsekutiven Kollektiv chronisch herzinsuffizienter Patienten unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung der Komorbidit{\"a}t zu bestimmen. Im Zeitraum von 2002-2003 wurden 1054 station{\"a}re oder ambulante Pa-tienten mit chronischer Herzinsuffizienz jeder {\"A}tiologie und jeden Schweregra-des konsekutiv in die Studie aufgenommen und {\"u}ber im Mittel 2 Jahre nachbeobachtet. Alle Patienten wurden detailliert klinisch, laborchemisch und echokardiographisch charakterisiert: das mediane Alter betrug 71,8 Jahre, 60\% der Patienten waren m{\"a}nnlich und 61\% der Patienten hatten eine reduzierte und 39\% eine erhaltene linksventrikul{\"a}re systolische Funktion. Der Grad der leitliniengerechten Pharmakotherapie (GLT) wurde gem{\"a}ß der MAHLER Studie berechnet, um die Qualit{\"a}t der Pharmakotherapie zu mes-sen. Er basierte auf der Verschreibung von ACE-Hemmern/AT1-Antagonisten, Betablockern und Mineralkortikoid-Rezeptorblockern (GLT-3), die gem{\"a}ß der Europ{\"a}ischen Leitlinien f{\"u}r die Behandlung der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz empfohlen sind. Zudem wurde der GLT-5 berechnet, der zus{\"a}tzlich die Medikation mit Diuretika und Herzglykosiden ber{\"u}cksichtigte. Bei Patienten mit reduzierter linksventrikul{\"a}rer systolischer Funktion betrug der mediane GLT-3 67\%. Er war invers assoziiert mit dem Alter, der NYHA Klasse und der H{\"a}ufigkeit der Komorbidit{\"a}ten. In den Kategorien „niedrig", „mittel" und „hoch" ergaben sich f{\"u}r den GLT-3 Mortalit{\"a}tsraten von 79, 30 und 11 pro 100 Patientenjahre Follow-up. In der multivariablen Cox-Regressionsanalyse war ein hoher vs. niedriger GLT-3 ein unabh{\"a}ngiger Pr{\"a}-diktor f{\"u}r ein niedrigeres Mortalit{\"a}tsrisiko: Hazard Rate 0,50, 95\%Konfidenzintervall (KI) 0,32-0,74, P<0,001. Außerdem blieb ein hoher GLT-3 bei Patienten h{\"o}heren Alters (HR 0,42, 95\%KI 0,27-0,66; P<0,001) und bei Frauen (HR 0,42, 95\%KI 0,23-0,79; P=0,007) mit einem niedrigeren Mortalit{\"a}tsrisiko assoziiert. Obwohl es bisher keine evidenzbasierten Leitlinien f{\"u}r Patienten mit erhaltener linksventrikul{\"a}rer systolischer Funktion gibt, wurden diese im klinischen Alltag {\"a}hnlich behandelt wie Patienten mit reduzierter linksventrikul{\"a}rer systolischer Funktion. Sie profitierten in unserer Studie von dieser Therapie in einem {\"a}hnlichen Maße wie Patienten mit reduzierter linksventrikul{\"a}rer systolischer Funktion (HR 0,37, 95\%KI 0,21-0,66, P<0,001). Zusammenfassend war in diesem konsekutiven Kollektiv eine leitlinien-gerechte Pharmakotherapie mit einer deutlich besseren Prognose der chroni-schen Herzinsuffizienz mit reduzierter linksventrikul{\"a}rer systolischer Funktion assoziiert, unabh{\"a}ngig von Alter oder Geschlecht. Eine {\"a}hnliche Verbesserung der Prognose konnte auch bei Patienten mit erhaltener linksventrikul{\"a}rer systolischer Funktion nachgewiesen werden.},
  subject      = {Pharmakotherapie},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WernerPoppFichtneretal.2022,
  author    = {Werner, Anne and Popp, Maria and Fichtner, Falk and Holzmann-Littig, Christopher and Kranke, Peter and Steckelberg, Anke and L{\"u}hnen, Julia and Redlich, Lisa Marie and Dickel, Steffen and Grimm, Clemens and Moerer, Onnen and Nothacker, Monika and Seeber, Christian},
  title     = {COVID-19 intensive care — Evaluation of public information sources and current standards of care in German intensive care units: a cross sectional online survey on intensive care staff in Germany},
  series = {Healthcare},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Healthcare},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {2227-9032},
  doi       = {10.3390/healthcare10071315},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281865},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Backround: In February 2021, the first formal evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19 were published in Germany and have been updated twice during 2021. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the dissemination pathways and strategies for ICU staff (first evaluation in December 2020 when previous versions of consensus-based guidelines (S2k) were published) and question selected aspects of guideline adherence of standard care for patients with COVID-19 in the ICU. Methods: We conducted an anonymous online survey among German intensive care staff from 11 October 2021 to 11 November 2021. We distributed the survey via e-mail in intensive care facilities and requested redirection to additional intensive care staff (snowball sampling). Results: There was a difference between the professional groups in the number, selection and qualitative assessment of information sources about COVID-19. Standard operating procedures were most frequently used by all occupational groups and received a high quality rating. Physicians preferred sources for active information search (e.g., medical journals), while nurses predominantly used passive consumable sources (e.g., every-day media). Despite differences in usage behaviour, the sources were rated similarly in terms of the quality of the information on COVID-19. The trusted organizations have not changed over time. The use of guidelines was frequently stated and highly recommended. The majority of the participants reported guideline-compliant treatment. Nevertheless, there were certain variations in the use of medication as well as the criteria chosen for discontinuing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to guideline recommendations. Conclusions: An adequate external source of information for nursing staff is lacking, the usual sources of physicians are only appropriate for the minority of nursing staff. The self-reported use of guidelines is high.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TiffeWagnerRueckeretal.2017,
  author    = {Tiffe, Theresa and Wagner, Martin and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Morbach, Caroline and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Heuschmann, Peter U.},
  title     = {Control of cardiovascular risk factors and its determinants in the general population - findings from the STAAB cohort study},
  series = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  number    = {276},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12872-017-0708-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-159391},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: While data from primary care suggest an insufficient control of vascular risk factors, little is known about vascular risk factor control in the general population. We therefore aimed to investigate the adoption of adequate risk factor control and its determinants in the general population free of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: Data from the Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A-B and Determinants of Progression (STAAB) Cohort Study, a population-based study of inhabitants aged 30 to 79 years from the general population of W{\"u}rzburg (Germany), were used. Proportions of participants without established CVD meeting targets for risk factor control recommended by 2016 ESC guideline were identified. Determinants of the accumulation of insufficiently controlled vascular risk factors (three or more) were assessed. Results: Between December 2013 and April 2015, 1379 participants without CVD were included; mean age was 53.1 ± 11.9 years and 52.9\% were female; 30.8\% were physically inactive, 55.2\% overweight, 19.3\% current smokers. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus were prevalent in 31.8\%, 57.6\%, and 3.9\%, respectively. Treatment goals were not reached despite medication in 52.7\% of hypertensive, in 37.3\% of hyperlipidemic and in 44.0\% of diabetic subjects. Insufficiently controlled risk was associated with male sex (OR 1.94, 95\%CI 1.44-2.61), higher age (OR for 30-39 years vs. 70-79 years 4.01, 95\%CI 1.94-8.31) and lower level of education (OR for primary vs. tertiary 2.15, 95\%CI 1.48-3.11). Conclusions: In the general population, prevalence of vascular risk factors was high. We found insufficient identification and control of vascular risk factors and a considerable potential to improve adherence to cardiovascular guidelines for primary prevention. Further studies are needed to identify and overcome patient- and physician-related barriers impeding successful control of vascular risk factors in the general population.},
  language  = {en}
}