@article{BoddenRichterSchreiberetal.2015,
  author    = {Bodden, Carina and Richter, S. Helene and Schreiber, Rebecca S. and Kloke, Vanessa and Gerß, Joachim and Palme, Rupert and Lesch, Klaus-Peter and Lewejohann, Lars and Kaiser, Sylvia and Sachser, Norbert},
  title     = {Benefits of adversity?! How life history affects the behavioral profile of mice varying in serotonin transporter genotype},
  series = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience},
  number    = {47},
  doi       = {10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00047},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143723},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Behavioral profiles are influenced by both positive and negative experiences as well as the genetic disposition. Traditionally, accumulating adversity over lifetime is considered to predict increased anxiety like behavior ("allostatic load"). The alternative "mismatch hypothesis" suggests increased levels of anxiety if the early environment differs from the later-life environment. Thus, there is a need for a whole-life history approach to gain a deeper understanding of how behavioral profiles are shaped. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effects of life history on the behavioral profile of mice varying in serotonin transporter (5-HIT) genotype, an established mouse model of increased anxiety-like behavior. For this purpose, mice grew up under either adverse or beneficial conditions during early phases of life. In adulthood, they were further subdivided so as to face a situation that either matched or mismatched the condition experienced so far, resulting in four different life histories. Subsequently, mice were tested for their anxiety-like and exploratory behavior. The main results were: (1) Life history profoundly modulated the behavioral profile. Surprisingly, mice that experienced early beneficial and later escapable adverse conditions showed less anxiety-like and more exploratory behavior compared to mice of other life histories. (2) Genotype significantly influenced the behavioral profile, with homozygous 5-HTT knockout mice displaying highest levels of anxiety-like and lowest levels of exploratory behavior. Our findings concerning life history indicate that the absence of adversity does not necessarily cause lower levels of anxiety than accumulating adversity. Rather, some adversity may be beneficial, particularly when following positive events. Altogether, we conclude that for an understanding of behavioral profiles, it is not sufficient to look at experiences during single phases of life, but the whole life history has to be considered.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlokeSchreiberBoddenetal.2014,
  author    = {Kloke, Vanessa and Schreiber, Rebecca S. and Bodden, Carina and M{\"o}llers, Julian and Ruhmann, Hanna and Kaiser, Sylvia and Lesch, Klaus-Peter and Sachser, Norbert and Lewejohann, Lars},
  title     = {Hope for the Best or Prepare for the Worst? Towards a Spatial Cognitive Bias Test for Mice},
  series = {PLOS ONE},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PLOS ONE},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0105431},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115569},
  pages     = {e105431},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Cognitive bias, the altered information processing resulting from the background emotional state of an individual, has been suggested as a promising new indicator of animal emotion. Comparable to anxious or depressed humans, animals in a putatively negative emotional state are more likely to judge an ambiguous stimulus as if it predicts a negative event, than those in positive states. The present study aimed to establish a cognitive bias test for mice based on a spatial judgment task and to apply it in a pilot study to serotonin transporter (5-HTT) knockout mice, a well-established mouse model for the study of anxiety- and depression-related behavior. In a first step, we validated that our setup can assess different expectations about the outcome of an ambiguous stimulus: mice having learned to expect something positive within a maze differed significantly in their behavior towards an unfamiliar location than animals having learned to expect something negative. In a second step, the use of spatial location as a discriminatory stimulus was confirmed by showing that mice interpret an ambiguous stimulus depending on its spatial location, with a position exactly midway between a positive and a negative reference point provoking the highest level of ambiguity. Finally, the anxiety- and depression-like phenotype of the 5-HTT knockout mouse model manifested - comparable to human conditions - in a trend for a negatively distorted interpretation of ambiguous information, albeit this effect was not statistically significant. The results suggest that the present cognitive bias test provides a useful basis to study the emotional state in mice, which may not only increase the translational value of animal models in the study of human affective disorders, but which is also a central objective of animal welfare research.},
  language  = {en}
}