@article{NowotnyAhmedBensingetal.2021,
  author    = {Nowotny, Hanna and Ahmed, S. Faisal and Bensing, Sophie and Beun, Johan G. and Br{\"o}samle, Manuela and Chifu, Irina and Claahsen van der Grinten, Hedi and Clemente, Maria and Falhammar, Henrik and Hahner, Stefanie and Husebye, Eystein and Kristensen, Jette and Loli, Paola and Lajic, Svetlana and Reisch, Nicole},
  title     = {Therapy options for adrenal insufficiency and recommendations for the management of adrenal crisis},
  series = {Endocrine},
  volume    = {71},
  journal   = {Endocrine},
  number    = {3},
  organization    = {Endo ERN (MTG1)},
  issn      = {1355-008X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s12020-021-02649-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-308769},
  pages     = {586-594},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a life-threatening condition requiring life-long glucocorticoid (GC) substitution therapy, as well as stress adaptation to prevent adrenal crises. The number of individuals with primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency in Europe is estimated to be 20-50/100.000. A growing number of AI cases are due to side effects of GC treatment used in different treatment strategies for cancer and to immunotherapy in cancer treatment. The benefit of hormone replacement therapy is evident but long-term adverse effects may arise due to the non-physiological GC doses and treatment regimens used. Given multiple GC replacement formulations available comprising short-acting, intermediate, long-acting and novel modified-release hydrocortisone as well as subcutaneous formulations, this review offers a concise summary on the latest therapeutic improvements for treatment of AI and prevention of adrenal crises. As availability of various glucocorticoid formulations and access to expert centers across Europe varies widely, European Reference Networks on rare endocrine conditions aim at harmonizing treatment and ensure access to specialized patient care for individual case-by-case treatment decisions. To improve the availability across Europe to cost effective oral and parenteral formulations of hydrocortisone will save lives.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BasilePuglisiAltierietal.2021,
  author    = {Basile, Vittoria and Puglisi, Soraya and Altieri, Barbara and Canu, Letizia and Lib{\`e}, Rossella and Ceccato, Filippo and Beuschlein, Felix and Quinkler, Marcus and Calabrese, Anna and Perotti, Paola and Berchialla, Paola and Dischinger, Ulrich and Megerle, Felix and Baudin, Eric and Bourdeau, Isabelle and Lacroix, Andr{\´e} and Loli, Paola and Berruti, Alfredo and Kastelan, Darko and Haak, Harm R. and Fassnacht, Martin and Terzolo, Massimo},
  title     = {What is the optimal duration of adjuvant mitotane therapy in adrenocortical carcinoma? An unanswered question},
  series = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {2075-4426},
  doi       = {10.3390/jpm11040269},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236507},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {A relevant issue on the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) concerns the optimal duration of adjuvant mitotane treatment. We tried to address this question, assessing whether a correlation exists between the duration of adjuvant mitotane treatment and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with ACC. We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis on 154 ACC patients treated for ≥12 months with adjuvant mitotane after radical surgery and who were free of disease at the mitotane stop. During a median follow-up of 38 months, 19 patients (12.3\%) experienced recurrence. We calculated the RFS after mitotane (RFSAM), from the landmark time-point of mitotane discontinuation, to overcome immortal time bias. We found a wide variability in the duration of adjuvant mitotane treatment among different centers and also among patients cared for at the same center, reflecting heterogeneous practice. We did not find any survival advantage in patients treated for longer than 24 months. Moreover, the relationship between treatment duration and the frequency of ACC recurrence was not linear after stratifying our patients in tertiles of length of adjuvant treatment. In conclusion, the present findings do not support the concept that extending adjuvant mitotane treatment over two years is beneficial for ACC patients with low to moderate risk of recurrence.},
  language  = {en}
}