@article{SommerAmrBavendieketal.2022, author = {Sommer, Kim K. and Amr, Ali and Bavendiek, Udo and Beierle, Felix and Brunecker, Peter and Dathe, Henning and Eils, J{\"u}rgen and Ertl, Maximilian and Fette, Georg and Gietzelt, Matthias and Heidecker, Bettina and Hellenkamp, Kristian and Heuschmann, Peter and Hoos, Jennifer D. E. and Keszty{\"u}s, Tibor and Kerwagen, Fabian and Kindermann, Aljoscha and Krefting, Dagmar and Landmesser, Ulf and Marschollek, Michael and Meder, Benjamin and Merzweiler, Angela and Prasser, Fabian and Pryss, R{\"u}diger and Richter, Jendrik and Schneider, Philipp and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Dieterich, Christoph}, title = {Structured, harmonized, and interoperable integration of clinical routine data to compute heart failure risk scores}, series = {Life}, volume = {12}, journal = {Life}, number = {5}, issn = {2075-1729}, doi = {10.3390/life12050749}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-275239}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Risk prediction in patients with heart failure (HF) is essential to improve the tailoring of preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies for the individual patient, and effectively use health care resources. Risk scores derived from controlled clinical studies can be used to calculate the risk of mortality and HF hospitalizations. However, these scores are poorly implemented into routine care, predominantly because their calculation requires considerable efforts in practice and necessary data often are not available in an interoperable format. In this work, we demonstrate the feasibility of a multi-site solution to derive and calculate two exemplary HF scores from clinical routine data (MAGGIC score with six continuous and eight categorical variables; Barcelona Bio-HF score with five continuous and six categorical variables). Within HiGHmed, a German Medical Informatics Initiative consortium, we implemented an interoperable solution, collecting a harmonized HF-phenotypic core data set (CDS) within the openEHR framework. Our approach minimizes the need for manual data entry by automatically retrieving data from primary systems. We show, across five participating medical centers, that the implemented structures to execute dedicated data queries, followed by harmonized data processing and score calculation, work well in practice. In summary, we demonstrated the feasibility of clinical routine data usage across multiple partner sites to compute HF risk scores. This solution can be extended to a large spectrum of applications in clinical care.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmiemannGreserMaunetal.2023, author = {Schmiemann, Guido and Greser, Alexandra and Maun, Andy and Bleidorn, Jutta and Schuster, Angela and Miljukov, Olga and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Klingeberg, Anja and Mentzel, Anja and Minin, Vitalii and Eckmanns, Tim and Heintze, Christoph and Heuschmann, Peter and G{\´a}gyor, Ildik{\´o}}, title = {Effects of a multimodal intervention in primary care to reduce second line antibiotic prescriptions for urinary tract infections in women: parallel, cluster randomised, controlled trial}, series = {BMJ}, volume = {383}, journal = {BMJ}, issn = {1756-1833}, doi = {10.1136/bmj-2023-076305}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-349395}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Objectives To evaluate whether a multimodal intervention in general practice reduces the proportion of second line antibiotic prescriptions and the overall proportion of antibiotic prescriptions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Design Parallel, cluster randomised, controlled trial. Setting General practices in five regions in Germany. Data were collected between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022. Participants General practitioners from 128 randomly assigned practices. Interventions Multimodal intervention consisting of guideline recommendations for general practitioners and patients, provision of regional data for antibiotic resistance, and quarterly feedback, which included individual first line and second line proportions of antibiotic prescribing, benchmarking with regional or supra-regional practices, and telephone counselling. Participants in the control group received no information on the intervention. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was the proportion of second line antibiotics prescribed by general practices, in relation to all antibiotics prescribed, for uncomplicated urinary tract infections after one year between the intervention and control group. General practices were randomly assigned in blocks (1:1), with a block size of four, into the intervention or control group using SAS version 9.4; randomisation was stratified by region. The secondary outcome was the prescription proportion of all antibiotics, relative within all cases (instances of UTI diagnosis), for the treatment of urinary tract infections after one year between the groups. Adverse events were assessed as exploratory outcomes. Results 110 practices with full datasets identified 10 323 cases during five quarters (ie, 15 months). The mean proportion of second line antibiotics prescribed was 0.19 (standard deviation 0.20) in the intervention group and 0.35 (0.25) in the control group after 12 months. After adjustment for preintervention proportions, the mean difference was -0.13 (95\% confidence interval -0.21 to -0.06, P\<0.001). The overall proportion of all antibiotic prescriptions for urinary tract infections over 12 months was 0.74 (standard deviation 0.22) in the intervention and 0.80 (0.15) in the control group with a mean difference of -0.08 (95\% confidence interval -0.15 to -0.02, P\<0.029). No differences were noted in the number of complications (ie, pyelonephritis, admission to hospital, or fever) between the groups. Conclusions The multimodal intervention in general practice significantly reduced the proportion of second line antibiotics and all antibiotic prescriptions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00020389}, language = {en} } @article{NeudeckerMalzahnHeuschmannetal.2015, author = {Neudecker, Jens and Malzahn, Uwe and Heuschmann, Peter and Behrens, Uwe and Walles, Thorsten}, title = {Pulmonary wedge resection plus parietal pleurectomy (WRPP) versus parietal pleurectomy (PP) for the treatment of recurrent primary pneumothorax (WOPP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial}, series = {Trials}, volume = {16}, journal = {Trials}, doi = {10.1186/s13063-015-1060-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145869}, pages = {540}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background For the surgical treatment of recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothoraces (rPSP) different operative therapies are applied to achieve permanent freedom from recurrence. Methods/design This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the long-term results of two commonly applied surgical techniques for the treatment of rPSP. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and after obtaining the patients' informed consent, participants are randomized into the two surgical treatment arms: pulmonary wedge resection plus parietal pleurectomy (WRPP) or parietal pleurectomy alone (PP). Consecutively, all study participants will be followed up for two years to evaluate the surgical long-term effect. The primary efficacy endpoint is the recurrence rate of pneumothorax within 24 months after surgery. The calculated sample size is 360 patients (n = 180 per treatment arm) to prove superiority of one of the two treatments. So far, 22 surgical sites have submitted their declaration of commitment, giving the estimated number of participating patients. Discussion A prospective randomized clinical trial has been started to compare two established surgical therapies to evaluate the long-term results regarding recurrence rates. Furthermore, cost of treatment, and influence on the perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as on quality of life are analyzed. If the study reveals equivalence for both surgical techniques, unnecessary pulmonary resections could be avoided.}, language = {en} } @article{MaggRieglerWiedmannetal.2015, author = {Magg, Barbara and Riegler, Christoph and Wiedmann, Silke and Heuschmann, Peter and Sommer, Claudia and {\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan}, title = {Self-administered version of the Fabry-associated pain questionnaire for adult patients}, series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, volume = {10}, journal = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, number = {113}, doi = {10.1186/s13023-015-0325-7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145294}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background Fabry-associated pain may be the first symptom of Fabry disease (FD) and presents with a unique phenotype including mostly acral burning triggerable pain attacks, evoked pain, pain crises, and permanent pain. We recently developed and validated the first Fabry Pain Questionnaire (FPQ) for adult patients. Here we report on the validation of the self-administered version of the FPQ that no longer requires a face-to-face interview but can be filled in by the patients themselves allowing more flexible data collection. Methods At our W{\"u}rzburg Fabry Center for Interdisciplinary Treatment, Germany, we have developed the self-administered version of the FPQ by adapting the questionnaire to a self-report version. To do this, consecutive Fabry patients with current or past pain history (n = 56) were first interviewed face-to-face. Two weeks later patients' self-reported questionnaire results were collected by mail (n = 55). We validated the self-administered version of the FPQ by assessing the inter-rater reliability agreement of scores obtained by supervised administration and self-administration of the FPQ. Results The FPQ contains 15 questions on the different pain phenotypes, on pain development during life with and without therapy, and on impairment due to pain. Statistical analysis showed that the majority of questions were answered in high agreement in both sessions with a mean AC1-statistic of 0.857 for 55 nominal-scaled items and a mean ICC of 0.587 for 9 scores. Conclusions This self-administered version of the first pain questionnaire for adult Fabry patients is a useful tool to assess Fabry-associated pain without a time-consuming face-to-face interview but via a self-reporting survey allowing more flexible usage.}, language = {en} } @article{KotsevaDeBackerDeBacqueretal.2019, author = {Kotseva, Kornelia and De Backer, Guy and De Bacquer, Dirk and Ryd{\´e}n, Lars and Hoes, Arno and Grobbee, Diederick and Maggioni, Aldo and Marques-Vidal, Pedro and Jennings, Catriona and Abreu, Ana and Aguiar, Carlos and Badariene, Jolita and Bruthans, Jan and Castro Conde, Almudena and Cifkova, Renata and Crowley, Jim and Davletov, Kairat and Deckers, Jaap and De Smedt, Delphine and De Sutter, Johan and Dilic, Mirza and Dolzhenko, Marina and Dzerve, Vilnis and Erglis, Andrejs and Fras, Zlatko and Gaita, Dan and Gotcheva, Nina and Heuschmann, Peter and Hasan-Ali, Hosam and Jankowski, Piotr and Lalic, Nebojsa and Lehto, Seppo and Lovic, Dragan and Mancas, Silvia and Mellbin, Linda and Milicic, Davor and Mirrakhimov, Erkin and Oganov, Rafael and Pogosova, Nana and Reiner, Zeljko and St{\"o}erk, Stefan and Tokg{\"o}zoğlu, L{\^a}le and Tsioufis, Costas and Vulic, Dusko and Wood, David}, title = {Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry}, series = {European Journal of Preventive Cardiology}, volume = {26}, journal = {European Journal of Preventive Cardiology}, number = {8}, organization = {EUROASPIRE Investigators}, issn = {2047-4873}, doi = {10.1177/2047487318825350}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-205526}, pages = {824-835}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Aims The aim of this study was to determine whether the Joint European Societies guidelines on secondary cardiovascular prevention are followed in everyday practice. Design A cross-sectional ESC-EORP survey (EUROASPIRE V) at 131 centres in 81 regions in 27 countries. Methods Patients (<80 years old) with verified coronary artery events or interventions were interviewed and examined ≥6 months later. Results A total of 8261 patients (females 26\%) were interviewed. Nineteen per cent smoked and 55\% of them were persistent smokers, 38\% were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), 59\% were centrally obese (waist circumference: men ≥102 cm; women ≥88 cm) while 66\% were physically active <30 min 5 times/week. Forty-two per cent had a blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg (≥140/85 if diabetic), 71\% had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥1.8 mmol/L (≥70 mg/dL) and 29\% reported having diabetes. Cardioprotective medication was: anti-platelets 93\%, beta-blockers 81\%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers 75\% and statins 80\%. Conclusion A large majority of coronary patients have unhealthy lifestyles in terms of smoking, diet and sedentary behaviour, which adversely impacts major cardiovascular risk factors. A majority did not achieve their blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glucose targets. Cardiovascular prevention requires modern preventive cardiology programmes delivered by interdisciplinary teams of healthcare professionals addressing all aspects of lifestyle and risk factor management, in order to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events.}, language = {en} } @article{JovanovicKlassenHeuschmannetal.2020, author = {Jovanovic, Ana and Klassen, Philipp and Heuschmann, Peter and Sommer, Claudia and Roberts, Mark and {\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan}, title = {English version of the self-administered Fabry Pain Questionnaire for adult patients}, series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, volume = {15}, journal = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, doi = {10.1186/s13023-020-01580-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230298}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background Pain is an early symptom of Fabry disease (FD) and is characterized by a unique phenotype with mainly episodic acral and triggerable burning pain. Recently, we designed and validated the first pain questionnaire for adult FD patients in an interview and a self-administered version in German: the Wurzburg Fabry Pain Questionnaire (FPQ). We now report the validation of the English version of the self-administered FPQ (enFPQ). Methods After two forward-backward translations of the FPQ by native German and native English speakers, the enFPQ was applied at The Mark Holland Metabolic Unit, Manchester, UK for validation. Consecutive patients with genetically ascertained FD and current or previous FD pain underwent a face-to-face interview using the enFPQ. Two weeks later, patients filled in the self-administered enFPQ at home. The agreement between entries collected by supervised administration and self-administration of the enFPQ was assessed via Gwet's AC1-statistics (AC1) for nominal-scaled scores and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interval-scaled elements. Results Eighty-three FD patients underwent the face-to-face interview and 54 patients sent back a completed self-administered version of the enFPQ 2 weeks later. We found high agreement with a mean AC1-statistics of 0.725 for 55 items, and very high agreement with a mean ICC of 0.811 for 9 items. Conclusions We provide the validated English version of the FPQ for self-administration in adult FD patients. The enFPQ collects detailed information on the individual FD pain phenotype and thus builds a solid basis for better pain classification and treatment in patients with FD.}, language = {en} } @article{HerrmannMuellerNotzetal.2023, author = {Herrmann, Johannes and M{\"u}ller, Kerstin and Notz, Quirin and H{\"u}bsch, Martha and Haas, Kirsten and Horn, Anna and Schmidt, Julia and Heuschmann, Peter and Maschmann, Jens and Frosch, Matthias and Deckert, J{\"u}rgen and Einsele, Hermann and Ertl, Georg and Frantz, Stefan and Meybohm, Patrick and Lotz, Christopher}, title = {Prospective single-center study of health-related quality of life after COVID-19 in ICU and non-ICU patients}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {13}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-023-33783-y}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357174}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Long-term sequelae in hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients may result in limited quality of life. The current study aimed to determine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after COVID-19 hospitalization in non-intensive care unit (ICU) and ICU patients. This is a single-center study at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Germany. Patients eligible were hospitalized with COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2020. Patients were interviewed 3 and 12 months after hospital discharge. Questionnaires included the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the generalized anxiety disorder 7 scale (GAD-7), FACIT fatigue scale, perceived stress scale (PSS-10) and posttraumatic symptom scale 10 (PTSS-10). 85 patients were included in the study. The EQ5D-5L-Index significantly differed between non-ICU (0.78 ± 0.33 and 0.84 ± 0.23) and ICU (0.71 ± 0.27; 0.74 ± 0.2) patients after 3- and 12-months. Of non-ICU 87\% and 80\% of ICU survivors lived at home without support after 12 months. One-third of ICU and half of the non-ICU patients returned to work. A higher percentage of ICU patients was limited in their activities of daily living compared to non-ICU patients. Depression and fatigue were present in one fifth of the ICU patients. Stress levels remained high with only 24\% of non-ICU and 3\% of ICU patients (p = 0.0186) having low perceived stress. Posttraumatic symptoms were present in 5\% of non-ICU and 10\% of ICU patients. HRQoL is limited in COVID-19 ICU patients 3- and 12-months post COVID-19 hospitalization, with significantly less improvement at 12-months compared to non-ICU patients. Mental disorders were common highlighting the complexity of post-COVID-19 symptoms as well as the necessity to educate patients and primary care providers about monitoring mental well-being post COVID-19.}, language = {en} } @article{HerrmannLotzKaragiannidisetal.2022, author = {Herrmann, Johannes and Lotz, Christopher and Karagiannidis, Christian and Weber-Carstens, Steffen and Kluge, Stefan and Putensen, Christian and Wehrfritz, Andreas and Schmidt, Karsten and Ellerkmann, Richard K. and Oswald, Daniel and Lotz, G{\"o}sta and Zotzmann, Viviane and Moerer, Onnen and K{\"u}hn, Christian and Kochanek, Matthias and Muellenbach, Ralf and Gaertner, Matthias and Fichtner, Falk and Brettner, Florian and Findeisen, Michael and Heim, Markus and Lahmer, Tobias and Rosenow, Felix and Haake, Nils and Lepper, Philipp M. and Rosenberger, Peter and Braune, Stephan and Kohls, Mirjam and Heuschmann, Peter and Meybohm, Patrick}, title = {Key characteristics impacting survival of COVID-19 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation}, series = {Critical Care}, volume = {26}, journal = {Critical Care}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1186/s13054-022-04053-6}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299686}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background Severe COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often requires extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent German health insurance data revealed low ICU survival rates. Patient characteristics and experience of the ECMO center may determine intensive care unit (ICU) survival. The current study aimed to identify factors affecting ICU survival of COVID-19 ECMO patients. Methods 673 COVID-19 ARDS ECMO patients treated in 26 centers between January 1st 2020 and March 22nd 2021 were included. Data on clinical characteristics, adjunct therapies, complications, and outcome were documented. Block wise logistic regression analysis was applied to identify variables associated with ICU-survival. Results Most patients were between 50 and 70 years of age. PaO\(_{2}\)/FiO\(_{2}\) ratio prior to ECMO was 72 mmHg (IQR: 58-99). ICU survival was 31.4\%. Survival was significantly lower during the 2nd wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A subgroup of 284 (42\%) patients fulfilling modified EOLIA criteria had a higher survival (38\%) (p = 0.0014, OR 0.64 (CI 0.41-0.99)). Survival differed between low, intermediate, and high-volume centers with 20\%, 30\%, and 38\%, respectively (p = 0.0024). Treatment in high volume centers resulted in an odds ratio of 0.55 (CI 0.28-1.02) compared to low volume centers. Additional factors associated with survival were younger age, shorter time between intubation and ECMO initiation, BMI > 35 (compared to < 25), absence of renal replacement therapy or major bleeding/thromboembolic events. Conclusions Structural and patient-related factors, including age, comorbidities and ECMO case volume, determined the survival of COVID-19 ECMO. These factors combined with a more liberal ECMO indication during the 2nd wave may explain the reasonably overall low survival rate. Careful selection of patients and treatment in high volume ECMO centers was associated with higher odds of ICU survival.}, language = {en} } @article{HerrmannAdamNotzetal.2020, author = {Herrmann, Johannes and Adam, Elisabeth Hannah and Notz, Quirin and Helmer, Philipp and Sonntagbauer, Michael and Ungemach-Papenberg, Peter and Sanns, Andreas and Zausig, York and Steinfeldt, Thorsten and Torje, Iuliu and Schmid, Benedikt and Schlesinger, Tobias and Rolfes, Caroline and Reyher, Christian and Kredel, Markus and Stumpner, Jan and Brack, Alexander and Wurmb, Thomas and Gill-Schuster, Daniel and Kranke, Peter and Weismann, Dirk and Klinker, Hartwig and Heuschmann, Peter and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Frantz, Stefan and Ertl, Georg and Muellenbach, Ralf Michael and Mutlak, Haitham and Meybohm, Patrick and Zacharowski, Kai and Lotz, Christopher}, title = {COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome — A Multicenter Observational Study}, series = {Frontiers in Medicine}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Medicine}, issn = {2296-858X}, doi = {10.3389/fmed.2020.599533}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219834}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background: Proportions of patients dying from the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vary between different countries. We report the characteristics; clinical course and outcome of patients requiring intensive care due to COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This is a retrospective, observational multicentre study in five German secondary or tertiary care hospitals. All patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in any of the participating hospitals between March 12 and May 4, 2020 with a COVID-19 induced ARDS were included. Results: A total of 106 ICU patients were treated for COVID-19 induced ARDS, whereas severe ARDS was present in the majority of cases. Survival of ICU treatment was 65.0\%. Median duration of ICU treatment was 11 days; median duration of mechanical ventilation was 9 days. The majority of ICU treated patients (75.5\%) did not receive any antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapies. Venovenous (vv) ECMO was utilized in 16.3\%. ICU triage with population-level decision making was not necessary at any time. Univariate analysis associated older age, diabetes mellitus or a higher SOFA score on admission with non-survival during ICU stay. Conclusions: A high level of care adhering to standard ARDS treatments lead to a good outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.}, language = {en} } @article{HebestreitZeidlerSchippersetal.2022, author = {Hebestreit, Helge and Zeidler, Cornelia and Schippers, Christopher and de Zwaan, Martina and Deckert, J{\"u}rgen and Heuschmann, Peter and Krauth, Christian and Bullinger, Monika and Berger, Alexandra and Berneburg, Mark and Brandstetter, Lilly and Deibele, Anna and Dieris-Hirche, Jan and Graessner, Holm and G{\"u}ndel, Harald and Herpertz, Stephan and Heuft, Gereon and Lapstich, Anne-Marie and L{\"u}cke, Thomas and Maisch, Tim and Mundlos, Christine and Petermann-Meyer, Andrea and M{\"u}ller, Susanne and Ott, Stephan and Pfister, Lisa and Quitmann, Julia and Romanos, Marcel and Rutsch, Frank and Schaubert, Kristina and Schubert, Katharina and Schulz, J{\"o}rg B. and Schweiger, Susann and T{\"u}scher, Oliver and Ungeth{\"u}m, Kathrin and Wagner, Thomas O. F. and Haas, Kirsten}, title = {Dual guidance structure for evaluation of patients with unclear diagnosis in centers for rare diseases (ZSE-DUO): study protocol for a controlled multi-center cohort study}, series = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, volume = {17}, journal = {Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1186/s13023-022-02176-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300440}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background In individuals suffering from a rare disease the diagnostic process and the confirmation of a final diagnosis often extends over many years. Factors contributing to delayed diagnosis include health care professionals' limited knowledge of rare diseases and frequent (co-)occurrence of mental disorders that may complicate and delay the diagnostic process. The ZSE-DUO study aims to assess the benefits of a combination of a physician focusing on somatic aspects with a mental health expert working side by side as a tandem in the diagnostic process. Study design This multi-center, prospective controlled study has a two-phase cohort design. Methods Two cohorts of 682 patients each are sequentially recruited from 11 university-based German Centers for Rare Diseases (CRD): the standard care cohort (control, somatic expertise only) and the innovative care cohort (experimental, combined somatic and mental health expertise). Individuals aged 12 years and older presenting with symptoms and signs which are not explained by current diagnoses will be included. Data will be collected prior to the first visit to the CRD's outpatient clinic (T0), at the first visit (T1) and 12 months thereafter (T2). Outcomes Primary outcome is the percentage of patients with one or more confirmed diagnoses covering the symptomatic spectrum presented. Sample size is calculated to detect a 10 percent increase from 30\% in standard care to 40\% in the innovative dual expert cohort. Secondary outcomes are (a) time to diagnosis/diagnoses explaining the symptomatology; (b) proportion of patients successfully referred from CRD to standard care; (c) costs of diagnosis including incremental cost effectiveness ratios; (d) predictive value of screening instruments administered at T0 to identify patients with mental disorders; (e) patients' quality of life and evaluation of care; and f) physicians' satisfaction with the innovative care approach. Conclusions This is the first multi-center study to investigate the effects of a mental health specialist working in tandem with a somatic expert physician in CRDs. If this innovative approach proves successful, it will be made available on a larger scale nationally and promoted internationally. In the best case, ZSE-DUO can significantly shorten the time to diagnosis for a suspected rare disease.}, language = {en} } @article{GagyorGreserHeuschmannetal.2021, author = {G{\´a}gyor, Ildik{\´o} and Greser, Alexandra and Heuschmann, Peter and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Maun, Andy and Bleidorn, Jutta and Heintze, Christoph and Jede, Felix and Eckmanns, Tim and Klingeberg, Anja and Mentzel, Anja and Schiemann, Guido}, title = {REDuction of Antibiotic RESistance (REDARES) in urinary tract infections using treatments according to national clinical guidelines: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a multimodal intervention in primary care}, series = {BMC Infectious Diseases}, volume = {21}, journal = {BMC Infectious Diseases}, doi = {10.1186/s12879-021-06660-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264725}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common cause of prescribing antibiotics in family medicine. In Germany, about 40\% of UTI-related prescriptions are second-line antibiotics, which contributes to emerging resistance rates. To achieve a change in the prescribing behaviour among family physicians (FPs), this trial aims to implement the guideline recommendations in German family medicine. Methods/design: In a randomized controlled trial, a multimodal intervention will be developed and tested in family practices in four regions across Germany. The intervention will consist of three elements: information on guideline recommendations, information on regional resistance and feedback of prescribing behaviour for FPs on a quarterly basis. The effect of the intervention will be compared to usual practice. The primary endpoint is the absolute difference in the mean of prescribing rates of second-line antibiotics among the intervention and the control group after 12 months. To detect a 10\% absolute difference in the prescribing rate after one year, with a significance level of 5\% and a power of 86\%, a sample size of 57 practices per group will be needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 10\%, an overall number of 128 practices will be required. The accompanying process evaluation will provide information on feasibility and acceptance of the intervention. Discussion: If proven effective and feasible, the components of the intervention can improve adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines and contribute to antimicrobial stewardship in ambulatory care.}, language = {en} } @article{GybergDeBacquerDeBackeretal.2015, author = {Gyberg, Viveca and De Bacquer, Dirk and De Backer, Guy and Jennings, Catriona and Kotseva, Kornelia and Mellbin, Linda and Schnell, Oliver and Tuomilehto, Jaakko and Wood, David and Ryden, Lars and Amouyel, Philippe and Bruthans, Jan and Conde, Almudena Castro and Cifkova, Renata and Deckers, Jaap W. and De Sutter, Johan and Dilic, Mirza and Dolzhenko, Maryna and Erglis, Andrejs and Fras, Zlatko and Gaita, Dan and Gotcheva, Nina and Goudevenos, John and Heuschmann, Peter and Laucevicius, Aleksandras and Lehto, Seppo and Lovic, Dragan and Milicic, Davor and Moore, David and Nicolaides, Evagoras and Oganov, Raphae and Pajak, Andrzej and Pogosova, Nana and Reiner, Zeljko and Stagmo, Martin and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Tokg{\"o}zoglu, Lale and Vulic, Dusko}, title = {Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology}, series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology}, volume = {14}, journal = {Cardiovascular Diabetology}, number = {133}, doi = {10.1186/s12933-015-0296-y}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141358}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background: In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. Methods: A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. Results: A total of 2846 (46 \%) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19 \%) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35 \%) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60 \%, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54 \% and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28 \%. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0 \% (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53 \% and 11 \% of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0 \% (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69 \% reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (approximate to 40 \%) and only 27 \% of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. Conclusions: Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.}, language = {en} } @article{ChungGedeborgNicholasetal.2014, author = {Chung, Shen-Chia and Gedeborg, Rolf and Nicholas, Owen and James, Stefan and Jeppsson, Anders and Wolfe, Charles and Heuschmann, Peter and Wallentin, Lars and Deanfield, John and Timmis, Adam and Jernberg, Tomas and Hemingway, Harry}, title = {Acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of short-term survival in national outcome registries in Sweden and the UK}, series = {Lancet}, volume = {383}, journal = {Lancet}, number = {9925}, doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62070-x}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121327}, pages = {1305-12}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background International research for acute myocardial infarction lacks comparisons of whole health systems. We assessed time trends for care and outcomes in Sweden and the UK. Methods We used data from national registries on consecutive patients registered between 2004 and 2010 in all hospitals providing care for acute coronary syndrome in Sweden and the UK. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality 30 days after admission. We compared effectiveness of treatment by indirect casemix standardisation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01359033. Findings We assessed data for 119 786 patients in Sweden and 391 077 in the UK. 30-day mortality was 7·6\% (95\% CI 7·4-7·7) in Sweden and 10·5\% (10·4-10·6) in the UK. Mortality was higher in the UK in clinically relevant subgroups defined by troponin concentration, ST-segment elevation, age, sex, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus status, and smoking status. In Sweden, compared with the UK, there was earlier and more extensive uptake of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (59\% vs 22\%) and more frequent use of β blockers at discharge (89\% vs 78\%). After casemix standardisation the 30-day mortality ratio for UK versus Sweden was 1·37 (95\% CI 1·30-1·45), which corresponds to 11 263 (95\% CI 9620-12 827) excess deaths, but did decline over time (from 1·47, 95\% CI 1·38-1·58 in 2004 to 1·20, 1·12-1·29 in 2010; p=0·01). Interpretation We found clinically important differences between countries in acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes. International comparisons research might help to improve health systems and prevent deaths.}, language = {en} } @article{BeierleSchobelVogeletal.2021, author = {Beierle, Felix and Schobel, Johannes and Vogel, Carsten and Allgaier, Johannes and Mulansky, Lena and Haug, Fabian and Haug, Julian and Schlee, Winfried and Holfelder, Marc and Stach, Michael and Schickler, Marc and Baumeister, Harald and Cohrdes, Caroline and Deckert, J{\"u}rgen and Deserno, Lorenz and Edler, Johanna-Sophie and Eichner, Felizitas A. and Greger, Helmut and Hein, Grit and Heuschmann, Peter and John, Dennis and Kestler, Hans A. and Krefting, Dagmar and Langguth, Berthold and Meybohm, Patrick and Probst, Thomas and Reichert, Manfred and Romanos, Marcel and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Terhorst, Yannik and Weiß, Martin and Pryss, R{\"u}diger}, title = {Corona Health — A Study- and Sensor-Based Mobile App Platform Exploring Aspects of the COVID-19 Pandemic}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, volume = {18}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, number = {14}, issn = {1660-4601}, doi = {10.3390/ijerph18147395}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242658}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Physical and mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic is typically assessed via surveys, which might make it difficult to conduct longitudinal studies and might lead to data suffering from recall bias. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) driven smartphone apps can help alleviate such issues, allowing for in situ recordings. Implementing such an app is not trivial, necessitates strict regulatory and legal requirements, and requires short development cycles to appropriately react to abrupt changes in the pandemic. Based on an existing app framework, we developed Corona Health, an app that serves as a platform for deploying questionnaire-based studies in combination with recordings of mobile sensors. In this paper, we present the technical details of Corona Health and provide first insights into the collected data. Through collaborative efforts from experts from public health, medicine, psychology, and computer science, we released Corona Health publicly on Google Play and the Apple App Store (in July 2020) in eight languages and attracted 7290 installations so far. Currently, five studies related to physical and mental well-being are deployed and 17,241 questionnaires have been filled out. Corona Health proves to be a viable tool for conducting research related to the COVID-19 pandemic and can serve as a blueprint for future EMA-based studies. The data we collected will substantially improve our knowledge on mental and physical health states, traits and trajectories as well as its risk and protective factors over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and its diverse prevention measures.}, language = {en} }