@article{BasilePuglisiAltierietal.2021,
  author    = {Basile, Vittoria and Puglisi, Soraya and Altieri, Barbara and Canu, Letizia and Lib{\`e}, Rossella and Ceccato, Filippo and Beuschlein, Felix and Quinkler, Marcus and Calabrese, Anna and Perotti, Paola and Berchialla, Paola and Dischinger, Ulrich and Megerle, Felix and Baudin, Eric and Bourdeau, Isabelle and Lacroix, Andr{\´e} and Loli, Paola and Berruti, Alfredo and Kastelan, Darko and Haak, Harm R. and Fassnacht, Martin and Terzolo, Massimo},
  title     = {What is the optimal duration of adjuvant mitotane therapy in adrenocortical carcinoma? An unanswered question},
  series = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {2075-4426},
  doi       = {10.3390/jpm11040269},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236507},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {A relevant issue on the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) concerns the optimal duration of adjuvant mitotane treatment. We tried to address this question, assessing whether a correlation exists between the duration of adjuvant mitotane treatment and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with ACC. We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis on 154 ACC patients treated for ≥12 months with adjuvant mitotane after radical surgery and who were free of disease at the mitotane stop. During a median follow-up of 38 months, 19 patients (12.3\%) experienced recurrence. We calculated the RFS after mitotane (RFSAM), from the landmark time-point of mitotane discontinuation, to overcome immortal time bias. We found a wide variability in the duration of adjuvant mitotane treatment among different centers and also among patients cared for at the same center, reflecting heterogeneous practice. We did not find any survival advantage in patients treated for longer than 24 months. Moreover, the relationship between treatment duration and the frequency of ACC recurrence was not linear after stratifying our patients in tertiles of length of adjuvant treatment. In conclusion, the present findings do not support the concept that extending adjuvant mitotane treatment over two years is beneficial for ACC patients with low to moderate risk of recurrence.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AltieriSbieraHerterichetal.2020,
  author    = {Altieri, Barbara and Sbiera, Silviu and Herterich, Sabine and De Francia, Silvia and Della Casa, Silvia and Calabrese, Anna and Pontecorvi, Alfredo and Quinkler, Marcus and Kienitz, Tina and Mannelli, Massimo and Canu, Letizia and Angelousi, Anna and Chortis, Vasileios and Kroiss, Matthias and Terzolo, Massimo and Fassnacht, Martin and Ronchi, Cristina L.},
  title     = {Effects of Germline CYP2W1*6 and CYP2B6*6 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Mitotane Treatment in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Multicenter ENSAT Study},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers12020359},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200565},
  pages     = {359},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Mitotane is the only approved drug for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and no biomarkers are available to predict attainment of therapeutic plasma concentrations and clinical response. Aim of the study was to evaluate the suitability of cytochrome P450(CYP)2W1 and CYP2B6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as biomarkers. A multicenter cohort study including 182 ACC patients (F/M = 121/61) treated with mitotane monotherapy after radical resection (group A, n = 103) or in not completely resectable, recurrent or advanced disease (group B, n = 79) was performed. CYP2W1*2, CYP2W1*6, CYP2B6*6 and CYP2B6 rs4803419 were genotyped in germline DNA. Mitotane blood levels were measured regularly. Response to therapy was evaluated as time to progression (TTP) and disease control rate (DCR). Among investigated SNPs, CYP2W1*6 and CYP2B6*6 correlated with mitotane treatment only in group B. Patients with CYP2W1*6 (n = 21) achieved less frequently therapeutic mitotane levels (>14 mg/L) than those with wild type (WT) allele (76.2\% vs 51.7\%, p = 0.051) and experienced shorter TTP (HR = 2.10, p = 0.019) and lower DCR (chi-square = 6.948, p = 0.008). By contrast, 55\% of patients with CYP2B6*6 vs. 28.2\% WT (p = 0.016) achieved therapeutic range. Combined, a higher rate of patients with CYP2W1*6WT+CYP2B6*6 (60.6\%) achieved mitotane therapeutic range (p = 0.034). In not completely resectable, recurrent or advanced ACC, CYP2W1*6 SNP was associated with a reduced probability to reach mitotane therapeutic range and lower response rates, whereas CYP2B6*6 correlated with higher mitotane levels. The association of these SNPs may predict individual response to mitotane.},
  language  = {en}
}