@article{RoelligKramerGabrechtetal.2018,
  author    = {R{\"o}llig, C. and Kramer, M. and Gabrecht, M. and H{\"a}nel, M. and Herbst, R. and Kaiser, U. and Schmitz, N. and Kullmer, J. and Fetscher, S. and Link, H. and Mantovani-L{\"o}ffler, L. and Kr{\"u}mpelmann, U. and Neuhaus, T. and Heits, F. and Einsele, H. and Ritter, B. and Bornh{\"a}user, M. and Schetelig, J. and Thiede, C. and Mohr, B. and Schaich, M. and Platzbecker, U. and Sch{\"a}fer-Eckart, K. and Kr{\"a}mer, A. and Berdel, W. E. and Serve, H. and Ehninger, G. and Schuler, U. S.},
  title     = {Intermediate-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone versus standard-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients},
  series = {Annals of Oncology},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Annals of Oncology},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy030},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226473},
  pages     = {973-978},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: The combination of intermediate-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone (IMA) can induce high complete remission rates with acceptable toxicity in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We present the final results of a randomized-controlled trial comparing IMA with the standard 7+3 induction regimen consisting of continuous infusion cytarabine plus daunorubicin (DA). Patients and methods: Patients with newly diagnosed AML>60 years were randomized to receive either intermediate-dose cytarabine (1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1, 3, 5, 7) plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m(2) days 1-3) (IMA) or standard induction therapy with cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) continuously days 1-7) plus daunorubicin (45 mg/m(2) days 3-5) (DA). Patients in complete remission after DA received intermediate-dose cytarabine plus amsacrine as consolidation treatment, whereas patients after IMA were consolidated with standard-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone. Results: Between February 2005 and October 2009, 485 patients were randomized; 241 for treatment arm DA and 244 for IMA; 76\% of patients were >65 years. The complete response rate after DA was 39\% [95\% confidence interval (95\% CI): 33-45] versus 55\% (95\% CI: 49-61) after IMA (odds ratio 1.89, P = 0.001). The 6-week early-death rate was 14\% in both arms. Relapse-free survival curves were superimposable in the first year, but separated afterwards, resulting in 3-year relapse-free survival rates of 29\% versus 14\% in the DA versus IMA arms, respectively (P = 0.042). The median overall survival was 10 months in both arms (P = 0.513). Conclusion: The dose escalation of cytarabine in induction therapy lead to improved remission rates in the elderly AML patients. This did not translate into a survival advantage, most likely due to differences in consolidation treatment. Thus, effective consolidation strategies need to be further explored. In combination with an effective consolidation strategy, the use of intermediate-dose cytarabine in induction may improve curative treatment for elderly AML patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JakubietzJakubietzMeffertetal.2017,
  author    = {Jakubietz, Rafael G. and Jakubietz, Michael G. and Meffert, Rainer H. and Schmidt, Karsten},
  title     = {Multiple-level replantation in elderly patients: risk versus benefit},
  series = {Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1097/GOX.0000000000001313},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158443},
  pages     = {e1313},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Multiple-level amputations of the upper extremity represent a surgical challenge generally only attempted in young patients. This case demonstrates a successful replantation in an elderly woman. The postoperative course was complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulopathy most likely due to inadequate resuscitation. Hand trauma is often underestimated in its general severity. Upper extremity amputations need to be handled similar to polytraumatized patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KatzorkeZellerMuelleretal.2017,
  author    = {Katzorke, Andrea and Zeller, Julia B. M. and M{\"u}ller, Laura D. and Lauer, Martin and Polak, Thomas and Reif, Andreas and Deckert, J{\"u}rgen and Herrmann, Martin J.},
  title     = {Reduced activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus in elderly APOE-E4 carriers during a verbal fluency task},
  series = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  doi       = {10.3389/fnhum.2017.00046},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-171892},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Apolipoprotein-E4 (APOE-E4) is a major genetic risk factor for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD). The verbal fluency task (VFT), especially the subtask category fluency, has shown to provide a good discrimination between cognitively normal controls and subjects with AD. Interestingly, APOE-E4 seems to have no effect on the behavioral performance during a VFT in healthy elderly. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to reveal possible compensation mechanisms by investigating the effect of APOE-E4 on the hemodynamic response in non-demented elderly during a VFT by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). We compared performance and hemodynamic response of high risk APOE-E4/E4, -E3/E4 carriers with neutral APOE-E3/E3 non-demented subjects (N = 288; 70-77 years). No difference in performance was found. APOE-E4/E4, -E3/E4 carriers had a decreased hemodynamic response in the right inferior frontal junction (IFJ) with a corresponding higher response in the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) during category fluency. Performance was correlated with the hemodynamic response in the MFG. We assume a compensation of decreased IFJ brain activation by utilizing the MFG during category fluency and thus resulting in no behavioral differences between APOE-groups during the performance of a VFT.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KristDimeoKeil2013,
  author    = {Krist, Lilian and Dimeo, Fernando and Keil, Thomas},
  title     = {Can progressive resistance training twice a week improve mobility, muscle strength, and quality of life in very elderly nursing-home residents with impaired mobility? A pilot study},
  series = {Clinical Interventions in Aging},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Clinical Interventions in Aging},
  doi       = {10.2147/CIA.S42136},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122176},
  pages     = {443-448},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Purpose: To determine the effects of progressive resistance training on mobility, muscle strength, and quality of life in nursing-home residents with impaired mobility. Methods: Nursing-home residents aged 77 years and older with impaired mobility were recruited in Berlin, Germany. The eight-week exercise program consisted of progressive resistance training twice a week. Mobility (primary outcome) was assessed with the Elderly Mobility Scale (zero = worst, 20 = best) at baseline and after 8 weeks. Muscle strength (secondary outcome) was determined by the eight-repetition maximum. The Short Form-36 Health Survey was used to assess quality of life. Results: Of the 15 participants (mean age 84 years, range 77-97 years), ten completed the 8-week program. Mobility (Elderly Mobility Scale mean +/- standard deviation pre 14.1 +/- 3.2 and post 17.5 +/- 3.6; P = 0.005) as well as muscle strength of upper and lower limbs improved (from 62\% at chest press up to 108\% at leg extension machine), whereas most quality of life subscales did not show considerable change. Conclusion: Resistance training twice a week over 2 months seemed to considerably improve mobility and muscle strength in persons aged 77-97 years with impaired mobility.},
  language  = {en}
}