@article{HohmHappelHurtienneetal.2022,
  author    = {Hohm, Anna and Happel, Oliver and Hurtienne, J{\"o}rn and Grundgeiger, Tobias},
  title     = {User experience in safety-critical domains: a survey on motivational orientations and psychological need satisfaction in acute care},
  series = {Cognition, Technology \& Work},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {Cognition, Technology \& Work},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {1435-5558},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10111-022-00697-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324486},
  pages     = {247-260},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The relevance of user experience in safety-critical domains has been questioned and lacks empirical investigation. Based on previous studies examining user experience in consumer technology, we conducted an online survey on positive experiences with interactive technology in acute care. The participants of the study consisted of anaesthesiologists, nurses, and paramedics (N = 55) from three German cities. We report qualitative and quantitative data examining (1) the relevance and notion of user experience, (2) motivational orientations and psychological need satisfaction, and (3) potential correlates of hedonic, eudaimonic, and extrinsic motivations such as affect or meaning. Our findings reveal that eudaimonia was the most salient aspect in these experiences and that the relevance of psychological needs is differently ranked than in experiences with interactive consumer technology. We conclude that user experience should be considered in safety-critical domains, but research needs to develop further tools and methods to address the domain-specific requirements.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{Dandekar2007,
  author    = {Dandekar, Thomas},
  title     = {Some general system properties of a living observer and the environment he explores},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-33537},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {In a nice assay published in Nature in 1993 the physicist Richard God III started from a human observer and made a number of witty conclusions about our future prospects giving estimates for the existence of the Berlin Wall, the human race and all the rest of the universe. In the same spirit, we derive implications for "the meaning of life, the universe and all the rest" from few principles. Adams´ absurd answer "42" tells the lesson "garbage in / garbage out" - or suggests that the question is non calculable. We show that experience of "meaning" and to decide fundamental questions which can not be decided by formal systems imply central properties of life: Ever higher levels of internal representation of the world and an escalating tendency to become more complex. An observer, "collecting observations" and three measures for complexity are examined. A theory on living systems is derived focussing on their internal representation of information. Living systems are more complex than Kolmogorov complexity ("life is NOT simple") and overcome decision limits (G{\"o}del theorem) for formal systems as illustrated for cell cycle. Only a world with very fine tuned environments allows life. Such a world is itself rather complex and hence excessive large in its space of different states - a living observer has thus a high probability to reside in a complex and fine tuned universe.},
  subject      = {Komplex <Algebra>},
  language  = {en}
}