@article{GaabAdolphTippeltetal.2022,
  author    = {Gaab, Christine and Adolph, Jonas E. and Tippelt, Stephan and Mikasch, Ruth and Obrecht, Denise and Mynarek, Martin and Rutkowski, Stefan and Pfister, Stefan M. and Milde, Till and Witt, Olaf and Bison, Brigitte and Warmuth-Metz, Monika and Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter and Dietzsch, Stefan and Pietsch, Torsten and Timmermann, Beate and Str{\"a}ter, Ronald and Bode, Udo and Faldum, Andreas and Kwiecien, Robert and Fleischhack, Gudrun},
  title     = {Local and systemic therapy of recurrent medulloblastomas in children and adolescents: results of the P-HIT-REZ 2005 Study},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14030471},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254809},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Recurrent medulloblastomas are associated with survival rates <10\%. Adequate multimodal therapy is being discussed as having a major impact on survival. In this study, 93 patients with recurrent medulloblastoma treated in the German P-HIT-REZ 2005 Study were analyzed for survival (PFS, OS) dependent on patient, disease, and treatment characteristics. The median age at the first recurrence was 10.1 years (IQR: 6.9-16.1). Median PFS and OS, at first recurrence, were 7.9 months (CI: 5.7-10.0) and 18.5 months (CI: 13.6-23.5), respectively. Early relapses/progressions (<18 months, n = 30/93) found mainly in molecular subgroup 3 were associated with markedly worse median PFS (HR: 2.34) and OS (HR: 3.26) in regression analyses. A significant survival advantage was found for the use of volume-reducing surgery as well as radiotherapy. Intravenous chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide (ivCHT, n = 28/93) showed improved PFS and OS data and the best objective response rate (ORR) was 66.7\% compared to oral temozolomide (oCHT, n = 47/93) which was 34.8\%. Intraventricular (n = 43) as well as high-dose chemotherapy (n = 17) at first relapse was not related to a significant survival benefit. Although the results are limited due to a non-randomized study design, they may serve as a basis for future treatment decisions in order to improve the patients' survival.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RichterWeickKriegeretal.2017,
  author    = {Richter, Anne and Weick, Stefan and Krieger, Thomas and Exner, Florian and Kellner, Sonja and Polat, B{\"u}lent and Flentje, Michael},
  title     = {Evaluation of a software module for adaptive treatment planning and re-irradiation},
  series = {Radiation Oncology},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Radiation Oncology},
  number    = {205},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13014-017-0943-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158711},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: The aim of this work is to validate the Dynamic Planning Module in terms of usability and acceptance in the treatment planning workflow. Methods: The Dynamic Planning Module was used for decision making whether a plan adaptation was necessary within one course of radiation therapy. The Module was also used for patients scheduled for re-irradiation to estimate the dose in the pretreated region and calculate the accumulated dose to critical organs at risk. During one year, 370 patients were scheduled for plan adaptation or re-irradiation. All patient cases were classified according to their treated body region. For a sub-group of 20 patients treated with RT for lung cancer, the dosimetric effect of plan adaptation during the main treatment course was evaluated in detail. Changes in tumor volume, frequency of re-planning and the time interval between treatment start and plan adaptation were assessed. Results: The Dynamic Planning Tool was used in 20\% of treated patients per year for both approaches nearly equally (42\% plan adaptation and 58\% re-irradiation). Most cases were assessed for the thoracic body region (51\%) followed by pelvis (21\%) and head and neck cases (10\%). The sub-group evaluation showed that unintended plan adaptation was performed in 38\% of the scheduled cases. A median time span between first day of treatment and necessity of adaptation of 17 days (range 4-35 days) was observed. PTV changed by 12 ± 12\% on average (maximum change 42\%). PTV decreased in 18 of 20 cases due to tumor shrinkage and increased in 2 of 20 cases. Re-planning resulted in a reduction of the mean lung dose of the ipsilateral side in 15 of 20 cases. Conclusion: The experience of one year showed high acceptance of the Dynamic Planning Module in our department for both physicians and medical physicists. The re-planning can potentially reduce the accumulated dose to the organs at risk and ensure a better target volume coverage. In the re-irradiation situation, the Dynamic Planning Tool was used to consider the pretreatment dose, to adapt the actual treatment schema more specifically and to review the accumulated dose.},
  language  = {en}
}